The Role of Relatedness and Unrelatedness for the Geography of Technological Breakthroughs in Europe

References

• Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., and Jakobsen, S.-E. 2016. Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study. Research Policy 45 (4): 844–56. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasiharofteh, M., Kogler, D. F., and Lengyel, B. 2020. Atypical combination of technologies in regional co-inventor networks. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 20.55. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., and Restrepo, P. 2019. Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (2): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.33.2.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., and Varga, A. 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy 31 (7): 1069–85. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G., and Lampert, C. M. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal 22 (June–July): 521–43. doi:10.1002/smj.176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arant, W., Fornahl, D., Grashof, N., Hesse, K., and Söllner, C. 2019. University-industry collaborations—The key to radical innovations? Review of Regional Research 39:119–41. doi:10.1007/s10037-019-00133-3.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, S., and Veugelers, R. 2015. Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention. Industrial and Corporate Change 24 (6): 1215–46. doi:10.1093/icc/dtu029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and Feldman, M. P. 2004. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol. 4, ed. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse, 2713–39. Elsevier North Holland: Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Autor, D. H. 2015. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., and Boschma, R. 2021. Complementary inter-regional linkages and Smart Specialisation. An empirical study on European regions. Regional Studies 55 (6): 1059–70. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1861240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., and Rigby, D. 2017. The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography 93 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., and Rigby, D. 2019. Smart specialization policy in the EU: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies 53 (9): 1252–68. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, E., and Gaetani, R. 2021. The geography of unconventional innovation. Economic Journal 131 (636): 1466–1514. doi:10.1093/ej/ueaa111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., and Strumsky, D. 2007. Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Research Policy 36 (1): 107–20. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. 1999. The rise of clusters of innovative industries in Belgium during the industrial epoch. Research Policy 28 (8): 853–71. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00026-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2017. Relatedness as driver behind regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies 51 (3): 351–64. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and Capone, G. 2015. Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy 44 (10): 1902–14. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Balland, P.-A., and Kogler, D. F. 2015. Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change 24 (1): 223–50. doi:10.1093/icc/dtu012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Heimeriks, G., and Balland, P-A. 2014. Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities. Research Policy 43 (1): 107–14. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., and Lissoni, F. 2009. Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography 9 (4): 439–68. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., and Malerba, F. 2003. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy 32 (1): 69–87. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlino, G. A., Chatterjee, S., and Hunt, R. M. 2007. Urban density and the rate of invention. Journal of Urban Economics 61 (3): 389–419. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2006.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo, J., Lyytinen, K., and Rose, G. 2012. A knowledge-based model of radical innovation in small software firms. MIS Quarterly 36 (3): 865–95. doi:10.2307/41703484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnabuci, G., and Operti, E. 2013. Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management Journal 34 (13): 1591–613. doi:10.1002/smj.2084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., and Los, B. 2017. Geographical patterns in US inventive activity 1977–1998: The ‘regional inversion’ was underestimated. Research Policy 46 (7): 1187–97. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., and Los, B. 2015. Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies 49 (5): 767–81. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.940305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffano, M., and Tarasconi, G. 2014. CRIOS-Patstat database: Sources, contents and access rules. Working Paper 1. Milan, Italy: Center for Research on Innovation, Organization and Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., and Quatraro, F. 2014. The emergence of new technology-based sectors in European regions: A proximity based analysis of nanotechnology. Research Policy 43 (10): 1681–96. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coniglio, N. D., Vurchio, D., Cantore, N., and Clara, M. 2021. On the evolution of comparative advantage: Path-dependent versus path-defying changes. Journal of International Economics 133 (November): 103522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradini, C. 2019. Location determinants of green technological entry: Evidence from European regions. Small Business Economics 52 (4): 845–58. doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9938-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortinovis, N., Xiao, J., Boschma, R., and van Oort, F. 2017. Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 17 (6): 1179–208. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbx001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo, J., Suire, R., and Vicente, J. 2014. Lock-in or lock-out? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience. Journal of Economic Geography 14 (1): 199–219. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbt006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin, K. B., and Behrens, D. M. 2005. When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Research Policy 34 (5): 717–37. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Noni, I., and Belussi, F. 2021. Breakthrough invention performance of multispecialized clustered regions in Europe. Economic Geography 97 (2): 164–86. doi:10.1080/00130095.2021.1894924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrochers, P., and Leppälä, S. 2011. Opening up the ‘Jacobs spillovers’ black box: Local diversity, creativity and the processes underlying new combinations. Journal of Economic Geography 11:843–63. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11 (3): 147–62. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, C. 2021. The geography of breakthrough innovation in the United States over the 20th century. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 21.26. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Felten, E., Raj, M., and Seamans, R. 2021. Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses. Strategic Management Journal 42 (12): 2195–217. doi:10.1002/smj.3286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science 47 (1): 117–32. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., Mingo, S., and Chen, D. 2007. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (3): 443–75. doi:10.2189/asqu.52.3.443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., Clark, J., and Soete, L. 1982. Unemployment and technical innovation: A study of long waves and economic development. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K, van Oort, F. G., and Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41 (5): 685–97. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and Wyrwich, M. 2021. Is innovation (increasingly) concentrated in large cities? An international comparison. Research Policy 50 (6): 104237. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G., and Levinthal, D. 2000 Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (1): 113–37. doi:10.2307/2666981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilsing V., Nooteboom B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., and Van Den Oord, A. 2008. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies. Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy 37 (10): 1717–31. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grashof, N., Hesse, K., and Fornahl, D. 2019. Radical or not? The role of clusters in the emergence of radical innovations. European Planning Studies 27 (10): 1904–23. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1631260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomila, R. 2021. Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 150 (4): 700–9. doi:10.1037/xge0000920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M. 2005. Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics 36 (1): 16–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and Preston, P. 1988. The carrier wave. New information technology and the geography of innovation 1846–2003. London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F., and Vopel, K. 1999. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (3): 511–15. doi:10.1162/003465399558265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervás-Oliver, J. L., Albors-Garrigos, J., Estelles-Miguel, S., and Boronat-Moll, C. 2018. Radical innovation in Marshallian industrial districts. Regional Studies 52 (10): 1388–97. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1390311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, K., and Fornahl, D. 2020. Essential ingredients for radical innovations? The role of un-related variety and external linkages in Germany. Papers in Regional Science 99 (5): 1165–83. doi:10.1111/pirs.12527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1969. The economy of cities. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., and de Rassenfosse, G. 2016. Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices. Working Paper w21868. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 577–98. doi:10.2307/2118401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., and Vakili, K. 2015 The double-edge sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management Journal 36 (10): 1435–57. doi:10.1002/smj.2294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, D. J., Ali, A., and Zahra, S. A. 2013. Where do breakthroughs come from? Characteristics of high-potential inventions. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30 (6): 1212–26. doi:10.1111/jpim.12055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, W. R. 2010. Breakthrough inventions and migrating clusters of innovation. Journal of Urban Economics 67 (1): 46–60. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A. 1987. Innovation patterns in crisis and prosperity: Schumpeter’s long cycle reconsidered. Hampshire, UK: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., and Stoffman, N. 2017. Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 132 (2): 665–712. doi:10.1093/qje/qjw040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, J., Younge, K., and Marco, A. 2020. Patent citations reexamined. RAND Journal of Economics 51 (1): 109–32. doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanjouw, J. O., and Schankerman, M. 2004. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal 114 (495): 441–65. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. 2020. Place-dependence of renewable energy technologies: Connecting local and global scale. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., Heimeriks, G., and Alkemade, F. 2021. Recombinant invention in solar photovoltaic technology: Can geographical proximity bridge technological distance? Regional Studies 55 (4): 605–16. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1839639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraut, S., Dernis, H., Webb, C., Spiezia, V., and Guellec, D. 2008. The OECD REGPAT Database OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1): 71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A., Hall, P., and Glasmeier, A. 1986. High tech America: The what, how, where and why of the sun-rise industries. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. 1987. Long waves of regional development. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martynovich, M., and Taalbi, J. 2020. Related variety, recombinant knowledge and regional innovation. Evidence for Sweden, 1991–2010. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 20.15. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Mewes, L. 2019. Scaling of atypical knowledge combinations in American metropolitan areas from 1836 to 2010. Economic Geography 95 (4): 341–61. doi:10.1080/00130095.2019.1567261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguélez, E., and Moreno, R. 2018. Relatedness, external linkages and regional innovation in Europe. Regional Studies 52 (5): 688–701. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montresor, F., and Quatraro, F. 2017. Regional branching and Key enabling technologies: Evidence from European patent data. Economic Geography 93 (4): 367–96. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1326810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montresor, F., and Quatraro, F. 2019. Green technologies and smart specialisation strategies: A European patent-based analysis of the intertwining of technological relatedness and key enabling-technologies. Regional Studies 54 (10): 1354–65. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1648784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montresor, S., Orsatti, G., and Quatraro, F. 2022. Technological novelty and key enabling technologies: Evidence from European regions. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. doi:10.1080/10438599.2022.2038147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, S., and Ocampo-Corrales, D. 2022. The ability of European regions to diversify in renewable energies: The role of technological relatedness. Research Policy 51 (5): 104508. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 2000. Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’hUallichain, B. 1999. Patent places: Size matters. Journal of Regional Science 39 (4): 613–36. doi:10.1111/0022-4146.00152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, C., and Soete, L. 1988. Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In technical change and economic theory, ed. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete, 458–79. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, F. L., Hartmann, D., Boschma, R., and Hidalgo, C. A. 2021. The time and frequency of unrelated diversification. Research Policy. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., and Marsh, L. 2006. Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal 27 (4): 369–88. doi:10.1002/smj.522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D. 2015. Technological relatedness and knowledge space: Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies 49 (11): 1922–37. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.854878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D. L., Roesler, C., Kogler, D., Boschma, R., and Balland, P.-A. 2022. Do EU regions benefit from smart specialization principles? Regional Studies. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2022.2032628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoalha, A., and Boschma, R. 2021. Diversifying in green technologies in European regions: Does political support matter? Regional Studies 55 (2): 182–95. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1744122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. P., and Frenken, K. 2008. Export variety and the economic performance of countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18 (2): 201–18. doi:10.1007/s00191-007-0081-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 1982. Demand-pull and technological invention: Schmookler revisited. Journal of Industrial Economics 30 (3): 225–37. doi:10.2307/2098216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U. 2008. Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final report to the World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenmakers, W., and Duysters, G. 2010. The technological origins of radical inventions. Research Policy 39 (8): 1051–59. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. 1988. New industrial spaces: Flexible production organization and regional development in North America and Western Europe. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Soete, L. 1987. The impact of technological innovation on international trade patterns: The evidence reconsidered. Research Policy 16 (2–4): 101–30. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(87)90026-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonn, J. W., and Storper, M. 2008. The increasing importance of geographical proximity in knowledge production: An analysis of US patent citations, 1975–1997. Environment and Planning A 40 (5): 1020–39. doi:10.1068/a3930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strumsky, D., and Lobo, J. 2015. Identifying the sources of technological novelty in the process of invention. Research Policy 44 (8): 1445–61. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. 2016. The emergence of new technology-based industries: The case of fuel cells and its technological relatedness to regional knowledge bases. Journal of Economic Geography 16 (3): 611–35. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbv011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli, S., and Carbonara, N. 2014. The role of knowledge variety and intensity for regional innovation. Small Business Economics 43 (2): 493–509. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9547-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., and Greve, H. R. 2006. Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal 49 (4): 723–40. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1): 172–87. doi:10.2307/2555502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., and Jaffe, A. 1997. University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 5 (1): 19–50. doi:10.1080/10438599700000006.
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., and Waltman, L. 2009. How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 60 (8): 1635–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, A. 2000. Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity. Journal of Regional Science 40 (2): 289–309. doi:10.1111/0022-4146.00175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, D., Bakker, J., and Veugelers, R. 2016. Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators. Research Policy 45 (3): 707–23. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspagen, B., and Duysters, G. 2004. The small worlds of strategic technology alliances. Technovation 24 (7): 563–71. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00123-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente J., Balland, P.-A., and Brossard, O. 2011. Getting into networks and clusters: Evidence from the Midi-Pyrenean Global Navigation Satellite Systems GNSS collaboration network. Regional Studies 45 (8): 1059–78. doi:10.1080/00343401003713340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. 1999. Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In Handbook of creativity, ed. R. J. Sternberg, 226–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L. 1998. Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (2): 331–60. doi:10.1162/003355398555595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Intellectual Property Organization. 2015. World Intellectual Property Report 2015—Breakthrough Innovation and Economic Growth WIPO Economics & Statistics Series. Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization—Economics and Statistics Division.
   Google Scholar