Response to Intervention: General or Special Education? Who Is Responsible?

References

• Bradley , R. , Danielson , L. and Doolittle , J. 2007 . Responsiveness to intervention: 1997–2007 . Teaching Exceptional Children , 39 ( 5 ) : 8 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Bradley , R. , Danielson , L. and Hallahan , D. , eds. 2002 . Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice , Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. .
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Chidsey , R. 2007 . No more “waiting to fail”: How Response to Intervention works and why it is needed . Educational Leadership , 65 ( 2 ) : 40 – 46 .
   Google Scholar
• Dykeman , B. F. 2006 . Alternative strategies in assessing special education needs . Education , 127 : 265 – 73 .
   Google Scholar
• Education for All Handicapped Children Act . 1975 . Public Law 94–142 , Washington, DC : U.S. Congress .
   Google Scholar
• Ehren , T. C. and Whitmire , K. A. 2005 . Leadership opportunities in the context of responsiveness to intervention activities . Topics in Language Disorders , 25 : 168 – 79 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farstrup , A. E. 2006 . Professional judgment versus mandated program fidelity . Reading Today , 23 ( 6 ) : 14
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher , J. M. , Coulter , W. A. , Reschly , D. J. and Vaughn , S. 2004 . Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers . Annals of Dyslexia , 54 ( 2 ) : 304 – 31 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs , D. and Fuchs , L. S. 2006 . Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? . Reading Research Quarterly , 41 ( 1 ) : 93 – 99 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs , L. S. and Fuchs , D. 2007 . A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention . Teaching Exceptional Children , 39 ( 5 ) : 14 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs , L. S. , Fuchs , D. and Hollenbeck , K. N. 2007 . Extending responsiveness-to-intervention to mathematics at first and third grades . Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 22 ( 1 ) : 13 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• Gersten , R. and Dimino , J. A. 2006 . RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again) . Reading Research Quarterly , 41 ( 1 ) : 99 – 108 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale , J. B. , Kaufman , A. , Naglieri , J. A. and Kavale , K. A. 2006 . Implementation of IDEA: Integrating Response to Intervention and cognitive assessment methods . Psychology in the Schools , 43 ( 7 ) : 753 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammill , D. D. , Leigh , J. E. , McNutt , G. and Larsen , S. C. 1987 . A new definition of learning disabilites . Journal of Learning Disabilities , 20 ( 2 ) : 109 – 13 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harry , B. and Klingner , J. 2007 . Discarding the deficit model . Educational Leadership , 64 ( 5 ) : 16 – 21 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage , M. 2007 . Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? . Phi Delta Kappan , 89 ( 2 ) : 140 – 45 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton , A. 2007 . Response to Intervention: Changing how we do business . Leadership , 36 ( 4 ) : 16 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• IDEA Regulations . 2006 . Federal Register 46540 . 71 ( 156 ) August 14
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Reauthorization . 2004 . Public Law No. 108–446 , Washington, DC : U.S. Congress .
   Google Scholar
• Klingner , J. K. and Edwards , P. A. 2006 . Cultural considerations with Response to Intervention models . Reading Research Quarterly , 41 ( 1 ) : 108 – 17 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellard , D. F. , Byrd , S. E. , Johnson , E. , Tollefson , J. M. and Boesche , L. 2004 . Foundations and research on identifying model responsiveness-to-intervention sites . Learning Disability Quarterly , 27 ( 4 ) : 243 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities . 2005, June . Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities Available at: http://www.ldonline.org/?module = uploads&func = download&fileId = 461
   Google Scholar
• New report discusses Response to Intervention . 2005 . Reading Today . 23 ( 1 ) : 3
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act . 2001 . Public Law No. 107–110 , Washington, DC : U.S. Congress .
   Google Scholar
• Peck , A. and Scarpati , S. 2007 . Special issue: Responsiveness to intervention . Teaching Exceptional Children , 39 ( 5 ) : 4
   Google Scholar
• Silberglitt , B. and Hintze , J. M. 2007 . How much growth can we expect? A conditional analysis of R-CBM growth rates by level of performance . Exceptional Children , 74 ( 1 ) : 71 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloat , E. A. , Beswick , J. F. and Willms , J. D. 2007 . Using early literacy monitoring to prevent reading failure . Phi Delta Kappan , 88 ( 7 ) : 523 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker , P. M. 2007 . Tertiary intervention: Using progress monitoring with intensive services . Teaching Exceptional Children , 39 ( 5 ) : 50 – 57 .
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel , P. A. 2007 . What does the law say? . Teaching Exceptional Children , 39 ( 5 ) : 65 – 67 .
   Google Scholar