Aligning Visions: Striking a Balance Between Personal Convictions for Teaching and Instructional Goals

References

• Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)fidelity: What new teacher resistance reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2011a). Does learning to teach ever end? Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(1), 22–24. doi:10.1080/00228958.2011.10516719
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2011b). Teaching in new times: What do teachers really need to know? [Special section]. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48(1), 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crocco, M., & Costigan, A. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512–535. doi:10.1177/0042085907304964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G. (2002). Visioning and the development of outstanding teachers. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(4), 331–344. doi:10.1080/19388070209558375
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G. (2008). Developing metacognitive teachers: Visioning and the expert's changing role in teacher education and professional development. In S. Israel, C. Block, K. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and professional development (pp. 299–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G., & Hoffman, J. V. (1999). In pursuit of an illusion: The flawed search for a perfect method. Reading Teacher, 53(1), 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. B., Malloy, J. A., & Mazzoni, S. A. (2011). Evidence-based best practices in comprehensive literacy instruction. In L. B. Gambrell & L. M. Morrow (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (4th ed., pp. 11–36). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guccione, L. M. (2011). In a world of mandates, making space for inquiry. Reading Teacher, 64(7), 515–519. doi:10.1598/RT.64.7.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K. (2006). Seeing through teachers’ eyes: Professional ideals and classroom practices. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., de Jong, E., & Platt, E. J. (2008). Marginalizing English as a second language teacher expertise: The exclusionary consequence of No Child Left Behind. Language Policy, 7(3), 267–284. doi:10.1007/s10993-008-9102-y
   Google Scholar
• Luther, V., & Richman, L. (2009). Teacher attrition: Listening to teachers to find a solution. Academic Leadership, 7(4), 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Maniates, H., & Mahiri, J. (2011). Post-scripts: Teaching reading in the aftermath of -prescriptive curriculum policies. Language Arts, 89(1), 10–21.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Pease-Alvarez, L., Cifka-Herrera, C., & Samway, K. D. (2010). Working within the system: Teachers of English learners negotiating a literacy instruction mandate. Language Policy, 9(4), 313–334. doi:10.1007/s10993-010-9180-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1391–1446. doi:10.3102/0034654309341374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G. (2009). Performance incentives: Their growing impact on American k–12 education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, J. (2011). Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113(1), 133–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the top executive summary. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S., Place, N., Martin, S. & Grossman, P. (2006). Curriculum materials for elementary reading: Shackles and scaffolds for four beginning teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 93–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M., & Faircloth, B. (2011). Understanding teacher visioning and agency during literacy instruction. In J. V. Hoffman, D. Shallert, C. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.), 60th yearbook of the Literacy Research Association (pp. 309–323). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M., & Parsons, S. A. (2012). Visions, enactments, obstacles, and negotiations: Case studies of two novice teachers enrolled in a graduate literacy course. Journal of Reading Education, 38(1), 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M., & Parsons, S. A. (2013). Teachers as innovators: Instructional adaptations opening spaces for enhanced literacy learning. Language Arts Journal, 91(2), 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Welman, J. C., & Kruger, S. J. (1999). Research methodology for the business and administrative sciences. Johannesburg, South Africa: International Thompson.
   Google Scholar