“We Don’t Go on the Computers Anymore!”: How Urban Children Lose in Learning Digital Literacies

References

• Balfanz, R., & Letgers, N. (2004). Locating the dropout crisis. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, G. D., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Chamberlain, A. M., Madden, N. A., & -Chambers, B. (2005). The national randomized field trial of Success for All: Second-year outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 673–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 1–22). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, B. (2007). Urban school achievement gap as a metaphor to conceal U.S. apartheid education. Theory into Practice, 46(3), 247–255. doi: 10.1080/00405840701402299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. (2000). Print environments and experiences offered to first-grade students in very low- and very high-SES school districts. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(4), 456–457. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.35.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farlas, G. (2004). The Black–White test score gap. Contexts, 3(2), 12–19. doi: 10.1525/ctx.2004.3.2.12
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, M. G., Dosen, A., & Guerrero, R. (2009). Bridging the digital divide: Changing the technological landscape of inner-city Catholic schools. Urban Education, 44(1), 11–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, K., & McDermott, P. (2014). Integrating the digital literacies into literacy diagnosis. New England Reading Association Journal, 49(2), 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• International Reading Association. (2009). New literacies and 21st century technologies: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Newark, DE: IRA.
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). ISTE Standards for Teachers. Wahington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/standards-for-teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2009). The 2009 Horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2009-Horizon-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P., & Costello, P. (2005). Principles of literacy assessment. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 256–267. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.2.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, S., Puckett, K., & Bell, S. M. (2006). Closing the digital divide: Update from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8 to 18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://kff.org/other/event/generation-m2-media-in-the-lives-of/.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570–1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Jr., McVerry, G., O’Byrne, I., Zawiliski, L., Castek, J., & Hartman, D. (2009). The new literacies of online reading comprehension and the irony of No Child Left Behind: Students who require our assistance the most, actually receive it the least. In M. Morrow, R. Rueda, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy and diversity (pp. 173–195). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Jr., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y., & O’Neil, M. (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension? In L. S. Rush, A. J. Eakle, & A. Berger (Eds.), Secondary school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practice (pp. 37–68). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lleras, C. (2008). Race, racial concentration, and the dynamics of educational inequality across urban and suburban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 886–912. doi: 10.3102/0002831208316323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education, U. S. Department of Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. DOE.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of English. (2007). 21st-century literacies. Urbana, IL: NCTE. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/PolicyResearch/21stCenturyResearchBrief.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards Initiative. Washington, DC: NGA, CCSSO. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/.
   Google Scholar
• National Writing Project. (2010). Because digital writing matters: Improving student writing in online and multimedia environments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. G., Beach, R., Scharber, C. (2007). ``Struggling" middle schoolers: Engagement and literate competence in a reading writing intervention class. Reading Psychology, 28(1), 51–73. doi: 10.1080/02702710601115463
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. G., & Scharber, C. (2008). Digital literacies go to schools: Potholes and possibilities. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(1), 66–68. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, T., Steele, C., & Hilliard, A. (2003). Young, gifted and Black: Promoting high achievement among African-American students. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Teale, W., Paciga, K., & Hoffman, J. (2007). Beginning reading instruction in urban schools: The curriculum gap ensures a continuing achievement gap. The Reading Teacher, 61(4), 344–348. doi: 10.1598/RT.61.4.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, N. T., Bean, T. W., & Dillard, B. R. (2010). When textbooks fall short: New ways, new texts, new sources of information in content areas. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur, D. J. (2010). iWrite: Using blogs, wikis, and digital stories in the English classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar