National Board Certified Teachers' Perspectives on Using Measures of Student Learning for Teacher Evaluation

References

• Abrams, L. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2013). Instructional influence of interim assessments: Voices from the field. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), Informing the practice of teaching using formative and interim assessment: A systems approach (pp. 105–130). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L.,... Shepard, L. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers ( EPI Briefing Paper #278). Retrieved from Economic Policy Institute website: http://www.epi.org/publication/bp278
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (2014). Exogenous variables and value-added assessments: A fatal flaw. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2011). The long-term impacts of teachers: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood ( Working Paper No. 17699). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://obs.rc.fas.harvard.edu/chetty/value_added.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. (2010/2011). Evaluations that help teachers learn. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 35–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., & Rothstein, J. (2012). Evaluating teacher evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 8–15. doi:10.1177/003172171209300603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, G., & Spillane, J. (Eds.). (2008). Teacher quality: Broadening and deepening the debate. Evanston, IL: Multidisciplinary Program in the Education Sciences, Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://www.sesp.northwestern.edu/docs/teacher-quality.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. N. (2011). Value-added measures in education: What every educator needs to know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R. (2009). Commentary: Research on teaching and learning. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 705–709). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2011). Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data. Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 587–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantopoulos, S. (2014). Teacher effects, value-added models, and accountability. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavigne, A. L., & Good, T. L. (2014). Teacher and student evaluation: Moving beyond the failure of school reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. (2012). Fine-tuning teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 50–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., Frontier, T., & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., & Toth, M. D. (2013). Teacher evaluation that makes a difference: A new model for teacher growth and student achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2011). Student learning, student achievement: How do teachers measure up? Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/sites/default/files/documents/research/NBPTS_Student%20Learning%20Student%20Achievement%20(2).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257. doi:10.3102/01623737026003237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papay, J. P. (2012). Refocusing the debate: Assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 123–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252. doi:10.1257/0002828041302244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, J. L., Hamilton, L. S., & Stecher, B. M. (2010). Incorporating student performance measures into teacher evaluation systems. Retrieved from RAND Corporation website: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2010/RAND_TR917.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stronge, J. H. (2010). Effective teachers = student achievement: What the research says. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Department of Education. (2013). Fine arts portfolio model: A new path to measuring growth in traditionally non-tested grades and subjects. Retrieved from http://team-tn.cloudapp.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Fine-Arts-Portfolio-Model-Overview.pdf
   Google Scholar