Value-Added Models for Teacher Preparation Programs: Validity and Reliability Threats, and a Manageable Alternative

References

• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (n.d.). About edTPA. Retrieved from http://edtpa.aacte.org/about-edtpa
   Google Scholar
• Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2008). Methodological concerns about the education value-added assessment system. Educational Researcher, 37(2), 65–75. doi:10.3102/0013189X08316420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2013). What's a nice test like you doing in a place like this? The edTPA and corporate education “reform.” Rethinking Schools, 27(4), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ballou, D., & Springer, M. G. (2015). Using student test scores to measure teacher performance: Some problems in the design and implementation of evaluation systems. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 77–86. doi:10.3102/0013189X15574904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 205–213. doi:10.1177/0022487105275904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (2014). Exogenous variables and value-added assessments: A fatal flaw. Teachers College Record, 116(1). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M. P., Duffy, M. L., Hazelkorn, M., & Bucholz, J. L. (2014). Policy and systems change: Planning for unintended consequences. The Clearing House, 87(3), 102–109.
   Google Scholar
• Buzick, H. M., & Laitusis, C. C. (2010). Using growth for accountability: Measurement challenges for students with disabilities and recommendations for research. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 537–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Piazza, P., & Power, C. (2013). The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 6–27. doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.739015
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Can value added add value to teacher evaluation? Educational Researcher, 44(2), 132–137. doi:10.3102/0013189X15575346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30(4), 507–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., Roach, A. T., & Kurz, A. (2014). Evaluating and advancing the effective teaching of special educators with a dynamic instructional practices portfolio. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(2), 83–98. doi:10.1177/1534508413511491
   Google Scholar
• Floden, R. E. (2012). Teacher value added as a measure of program quality: Interpret with caution. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 356–360. doi:10.1177/0022487112454175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, D. (2014). Reformers, batting averages, and malpractice: The case for caution in value-added use. The Educational Forum, 78(2), 128–141. doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.878427
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Rubin, M., Neumerski, C. M., Cannata, M., Drake, T., & Schuermann, P. (2015). Make room value added: Principals’ human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 96–104. doi:10.3102/0013189X15575031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, R., & Brady, M. P. (1991). Individual and classwide patterns of teachers’ questioning in mainstreamed social studies and science classes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(3), 253–262. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(91)90032-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Kapitula, L., & Umland, K. A. (2011). A validity argument approach to evaluating teacher value-added scores. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 794–831. doi:10.3102/0002831210387916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdheide, L. R., Goe, L., Croft, A., & Reschly, D. J. (2010). Challenges in evaluating special education teachers and English language learner specialists. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. D., & Brownell, M. T. (2014). Examining the use of classroom observations in the evaluation of special education teachers. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(2), 112–124. doi:10.1177/1534508413514103
   Google Scholar
• Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record, 116(1). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincove, J. A., Osborne, C., Dillon, A., & Mills, N. (2014). The politics and statistics of value-added modeling for accountability of teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 24–38. doi:10.1177/0022487113504108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, J. R., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Le, V.-N., & Martinez, J. F. (2007). The sensitivity of value-added teacher effect estimates to different mathematics achievement measures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(1), 47–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D. F., Sass, T. R., Lockwood, J. R., & Mihaly, K. (2009). The intertemporal variability of teacher effect estimates. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 572–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morganstein, D., & Wasserstein, R. (2014). ASA statement on value-added models. Statistics and Public Policy, 1(1), 108–110. doi:10.1080/2330443X.2014.956906
   Google Scholar
• Paige, M. (2012). Using VAM in high-stakes employment decisions. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(3), 29–32. doi:10.1177/003172171209400307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papay, J. P. (2011). Different tests, different answers: The stability of teacher value-added estimates across outcome measures. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 163–193. doi:10.3102/0002831210362589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecheone, R. L., Shear, B., Whittaker, A., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). 2013 edTPA field test: Summary report. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity.
   Google Scholar
• Plecki, M. L., Elfers, A. M., & Nakamura, Y. (2012). Using evidence for teacher education program improvement and accountability: An illustrative case of the role of value-added measures. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 318–334. doi:10.1177/0022487112447110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullin, D. (2014). Performance, value, and accountability: Public policy goals and legal implications of the use of performance assessments in the preparation and licensing of educators. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Shores, R. E. (1979). Evaluation and research. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2(3), 68–71. doi:10.1177/088840647900200326
   Google Scholar
• Sindelar, P. T., & Rosenberg, M. S. (2000). Serving too many masters: The proliferation of ill-conceived and contradictory policies and practices in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 188–193. doi:10.1177/0022487100051003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbrecher, T. D., Selig, J. P., Cosbey, J., & Thorstensen, B. I. (2014). Evaluating special educator effectiveness: Addressing issues inherent to value-added modeling. Exceptional Children, 80(3), 323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swank, P. R., Taylor, R. D., Brady, M. P., & Freiberg, H. J. (1989). Sensitivity of classroom observation systems: Measuring teacher effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Education, 57(2), 171–186. doi:10.1080/00220973.1989.10806504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, O. R., & Haring, N. G. (1980). Exceptional teaching (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar