References
- Academic Benchmarks. (n.d.). Next Generation Science Standards adoption map. Retrieved from http://academicbenchmarks.com/next-generation-science-standards-adoption-map/
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks on-line: 4. The Physical Setting. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/ch4/ch4.htm#D_M
- Bybee, R. W. (1995). Science curriculum reform in the United States. In R. W. Bybee & J. D. McInerney (Eds.), Redesigning the science curriculum (pp. 12–20). Retrieved from http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg3a.htm
- Colvill, M., & Pattie, I. (2002a). Science skills: The building blocks for scientific literacy (Part 1). Investigating, 18(3), 20–22.
- Colvill, M., & Pattie, I. (2002b). Science skills: The building blocks for scientific literacy (Part 2). Investigating, 18(4), 27–30.
- Colvill, M., & Pattie, I. (2003). Science skills: The building blocks for scientific literacy (Part 3). Investigating, 19(1), 21–23.
- Dorph, R., Goldstein, D., Lee, S., Lepori, K., Schneider, S., & Venkatesan, S. (2007). The status of science education in the Bay Area: Research brief. Retrieved from Lawrence Hall of Science website: http://static.lawrencehallofscience.org/rea/bayareastudy/pdf/final_to_print_research_brief.pdf
- Dorph, R., Shields, P., Tiffany-Morales, J., Hartry, A., & McCaffrey, T. (2011). High hopes—few opportunities: The status of elementary science education in California. Sacramento, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning at WestEd. Retrieved from http://www.lawrencehallofscience.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/about/ScienceFullReportweb.pdf
- Froschauer, L. (2010). Editor's note: Inquiry—process skills. Science & Children, 48(2), 6.
- Hershberger, K., Zembal-Saul, C., & Starr, M. L. (2006, January 20). Evidence helps the KWL get a KLEW. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=51519
- Jorgenson, O., & Vanosdall, R. (2002). The death of science? What we risk in our rush toward standardized testing and the three R's. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 601–605.
- Koch, J. (2013). Science stories: Science methods for elementary and middle school teachers (5th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- McNeill, K. L., & Martin, D. M. (2011). Claims, evidence, and reasoning: Demystifying data during a unit on simple machines. Science and Children, 48(8), 52–56.
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States. (2015a). Fourth-grade physical science evidence statements. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/evidence_statement/black_white/4%20PS%20Evidence%20Statements%20June%202015%20asterisks.pdf
- NGSS Lead States. (2015b). NGSS K–8 evidence statements now available [ Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/ngss-k-8-evidence-statements-now-available
- Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570.
- Padilla, M. (1990). The science process skills. Research Matters—to the Science Teacher [ No. 9004]. Retrieved from http://www.narst.org/publications/research/skill.cfm
- Padilla, M. (2010). Inquiry, process skills, and thinking in science. Science & Children, 48(2), 8–9.
- Petrinjak, L. (2011, July 19). Elementary teachers getting less time for science. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=58727
- White, E. L., & Harrison, T. G. (2012). UK school students' attitudes towards science and potential science-based careers. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(4), 1–10.