References
- Balfanz, R., & Legters, N. (2004). Locating the dropout crisis: Which high schools produce the nation's dropouts? Where are they located? Who attends them? (Report 70). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.
- Biegel, S. (2008). Court-mandated education reform: The San Francisco experience and the shaping of educational policy after Seattle–Louisville and Brian Ho v. SFUSD. Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 4(2), 159–215.
- Bifulco, R., Cobb, C. D., & Bell, C. (2009). Can interdistrict choice boost student achievement? The case of Connecticut's interdistrict magnet school program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 323–345.
- Braddock, J. H., II. (2009). Looking back: The effects of court-ordered desegregation. In C. Smrekar & E. Goldring (Eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation (pp. 3–18). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Cohn, D. (2016, June 23). It's official: Minority babies are the majority among the nation's infants, but only just. Retrieved from Pew Research Center website: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/23/its-official-minority-babies-are-the-majority-among-the-nations-infants-but-only-just
- Crain, R. L. (1970). School integration and occupational achievement of Negroes. American Journal of Sociology, 75(4, Part 2), 593–606.
- Dawkins, M. P. (1983). Black students’ occupational expectations: A national study of the impact of school desegregation. Urban Education, 18(1), 98–113.
- Deruy, E. (2016, March 10). How perceptions about opportunity vary by race. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/03/americans-different-perceptions-of-opportunity/473127
- Desai, M. A., Dharmapala, D., & Singhal, M. (2008). Tax incentives for affordable housing: The Low Income Housing Tax Credit (Working Paper No. 14149). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Frankenberg, E., & Orfield, G. (2012). The resegregation of suburban schools: A hidden crisis in American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Frey, W. H., Berube, A., Singer, A., & Wilson, J. H. (2009). Getting current: Recent demographic trends in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Institution.
- Gándara, P., & Hopkins, M. (Eds.). (2010). Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Gándara, P., & Mordechay, K. (2017). Demographic change and the new (and not so new) challenges for Latino education. The Educational Forum, 81(2), 148–159.
- Gándara, P., & Orfield, G. (2010). A return to the “Mexican room”: The segregation of Arizona's English learners. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
- Hobbs, F., & Stoops, N. (2002). Demographic trends in the 20th century (U.S. Census Bureau, Census Special Report No. CENSR-4). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Johnson, R. C. (2015). Long-run impacts of school desegregation and school quality on adult attainments (Working Paper No. 16664). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Kahlenberg, R. D. (2007). Socioeconomic school integration. North Carolina Law Review, 85(5), 1545–1594.
- Killen, M., Crystal, D. S., & Ruck, M. (2007). The social developmental benefits of intergroup contact among children and adolescents. In E. Frankenberg & G. Orfield (Eds.), Lessons in integration: Realizing the promise of racial diversity in American schools (pp. 57–73). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
- Kneebone, E. (2014). The growth and spread of concentrated poverty, 2000 to 2008–2012. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
- Kurlaender, M., & Yun, J. T. (2001). Is diversity a compelling educational interest? Evidence from Louisville. In G. Orfield (Ed.), Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action (pp. 117–141). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Le, C. Q. (2010). Racially integrated education and the role of the federal government. North Carolina Law Review, 88(3), 725–786.
- Manyika, J., Remes, J., Dobbs, R., Orellana, J., & Schaer, F. (2012). Urban America: US cities in the global economy. Retrieved from McKinsey Global Institute website: http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/urbanization/us-cities-in-the-global-economy
- Maxwell, L. A. (2014). U.S. school enrollment hits majority-minority milestone. Education Week, 33(37), p. 1.
- Mordechay, K. (2011). Fragmented economy, stratified society, and the shattered dream. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
- Mordechay, K. (2014). Vast changes and an uneasy future: Racial and regional inequality in Southern California. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
- National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. (1968). Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Orfield, G. (2013). Housing segregation produces unequal schools: Causes and solutions. In P. L. Carter & K. G. Welner (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 40–60). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Orfield, G. (2014). Tenth annual Brown lecture in education research: A new civil rights agenda for American education. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 273–292.
- Orfield, G., & Frankenberg, E. (with Ee, J., & Kuscera, J.). (2014). Brown at 60: Great progress, a long retreat and an uncertain future. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
- Orfield, G., Kucsera, J., & Siegel-Hawley, G. (2012). E pluribus … separation: Deepening double segregation for more students. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
- Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project.
- Page, S. E. (2008). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Pfeiffer, D. (2009). The opportunity illusion: Subsidized housing and failing schools in California. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
- Rosen, M., & Sullivan, W. (2014). From urban renewal and displacement to economic inclusion: San Francisco affordable housing policy 1978–2014. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 25(1), 121–162.
- Rusk, D. (2011). “Housing policy is school policy”: A commentary. In P. Tegeler (Ed.), Finding common ground: Coordinating housing and education policy to promote integration (pp. 21–30). Washington, DC: Poverty & Race Research Action Council.
- Schwartz, H. (2010). Housing policy is school policy: Economically integrative housing promotes academic success in Montgomery County, Maryland. New York, NY: Century Foundation.
- Storper, M., Kemeny, T., Makarem, N., & Osman, T. (2015). The rise and fall of urban economies: Lessons from San Francisco and Los Angeles. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Tegeler, P. (Ed.). (2011). Finding common ground: Coordinating housing and education policy to promote integration. Washington, DC: Poverty & Race Research Action Council.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (1990). 1990 census demographic profile. Washington, DC: Author.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). 2000 census demographic profile. Washington, DC: Author.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). American Community Survey (ACS). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs
- Wells, A. S., & Crain, R. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 6(4), 531–555.