References
- Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & Dillon, J. (2014). ‘It didn’t really change my opinion’: Exploring what works, what doesn’t and why in a school science, technology, engineering and mathematics careers intervention. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 35–55. doi:10.1080/02635143.2013.865601
- ASPIRES (2013). Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10–14. Retrieved from: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/aspires/ASPIRES-final-report-December-2013.pdf
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter. Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072
- Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., Moller, L., & Valentino, L. (2015). Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Economics of Education Review, 45, 14–27. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.002
- Buck, G. A., Clark, V. L., Leslie-Pelecky, D., Lu, Y., & Cerda-Lizarraga, P. (2008). Examining cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science Education, 92(4), 688–707. doi:10.1002/sce.20257
- Carrell, S., Page, M., & West, J. (2010). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1101–1144. doi:10.3386/w14959
- Chang, L., & Kono, Y. (2014). International student mobility trends 2014: The upward momentum of SCIENCE fields. World Education News & Reviews. from http://wenr.wes.org/2014/03/international-student-mobility-trends-2014-the-upward-momentum-of-science-fields/. doi:10.1111/gec3.12080
- Cronin, C., & Roger, A. (1999). Theorizing progress: Women in science, engineering, and technology in higher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 639–661. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199908)36:6<637::AID-TEA4>3.3.CO;2-0
- Department for Education (2018a). Revised GCSE and equivalent results in England, 2017 to 2018. Retrieved 19 December 2018, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/748503/2018_KS4_statistical_release.pdf
- Department for Education (2018b). Schools, pupils and their characteristics: January 2018. Retrieved 21 December 2018, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/720158/Schools_Pupils_and_their_Characteristics_2018_National_Tables.xlsx
- Diseth, A., Meland, E., & Breidablik, H. J. (2014). Self-beliefs among students: grade level and gender differences in self-esteem, self-efficacy and implicit theories of intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.003
- Dubetz, T., & Wilson, J. (2013). Girls in engineering, mathematics and science, GEMS: A science outreach program from middle-school female students. Journal of Science Education, 14, 41–47. Retrieved 21 December 2018, from https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1614/1542
- Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
- Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the achiever: The structure of adolescents’ academic achievement related-beliefs and self-perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215–225. doi:10.1177/0146167295213003
- European Roundtable of Industrialists (2009). Mathematics, science and technology education report: The case for a European coordinating body. Retrieved from http://ert.eu/sites/ert/files/generated/files/document/mst_report_final.pdf
- Güngören, S., & Sungur, S. (2009). The effect of grade level on elementary school students’ motivational beliefs in science. International Journal of Learning, 16, 495–506. doi:10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i03/46200
- Haste, H. (2004). Science in my future: A study of values and beliefs in relation to science and technology among 11-21 year olds. London, Nestlé Social Research programme.
- Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
- Huang, C. J. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y
- Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. doi:10.1126/science.1177067
- Joint Council for Qualifications (2018). GCSE (full course): Outcomes for all grade sets and age breakdowns for UK candidates: Results summer 2018. Retrieved from https://www.jcq.org.uk/Download/examination-results/gcses/2018/main-results-tables/gcse-full-course-results-summer-2018
- Kirkpatrick, D. (1994). Evaluating training programs. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
- Koller, O., Baumert, J., & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 448–470. doi:10.2307/749801
- Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 60–70. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.60
- Mellors-Bourne, R., Connor, H., & Jackson, C. (2011). STEM graduates in non-STEM jobs. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32379/11-771-stem-graduates-in-non-stem-jobs.pdf
- National Science Foundation (2015). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering 2015. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15311/digest/nsf15311-digest.pdf doi:10.1037/e558442013-001
- Purcell, K., Elias, P., Ellison, R., Atfield, G., Adam, D., & Livanos, I. (2008). Plans, aspirations and realities: taking stock of higher education and career choices one year on. Findings from the First Futuretrack Survey of the “Class of 2006” applicants for Higher Education. Retrieved from https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/ier/futuretrack/findings/futuretrack_2006_stage2_full_report_2009.pdf
- Schreiner, C., & Sjoberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction. Two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 231–247). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Retrieved from https://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/Values-ROSE-Schreiner-Sjoberg.pdf
- Science and Technology Committee (2012). Higher education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (SCIENCE) subjects. HL37. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldsctech/37/37.pdf
- Scull, S., & Cuthill, M. (2010). Engaged outreach: Using community engagement to facilitate access to higher education for people from low socio-economic backgrounds. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 59–74. doi:10.1080/07294360903421368
- Spinath, B., Spinath, F., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34(4), 363–374. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.004
- Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and Blacks. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.52.6.613
- The Royal Society (2006). A degree of concern? UK first degrees in science, technology and mathematics. London, UK: Author.
- Tripney, J., Newman, M., Bangpan, M., Niza, C., Mackintosh, M., & Sinclair, J. (2010). Factors influencing young people (aged 14–19) in education about STEM subject choices: A systematic review of the UK literature. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1472699/7/Tripney_wtx063082.pdf
- Tyler-Wood, T., Ellison, A., Lim, O., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2012). Bringing up girls in science (BUGS): The effectiveness of an afterschool environmental science program for increasing female students’ interest in science careers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 46–55. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9279-2
- Tyler-Wood, T., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2010). Instruments for assessing interest in SCIENCE content and careers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 345–368. Retrieved 21 December 2018, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/32311/
- U.S. Department of Education (2016). Science, technology, engineering and math: Education for global leadership. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/stem
- Vidal Rodeiro, C. L. (2007). A level subject choice in England: Patterns of uptake and factors affecting subject preferences. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/images/111069-a-level-subject-choice-in-england-patterns-of-uptake-and-factors-affecting-subject-preferences.pdf
- Wang, Y., & Tsai, C. (2016). Taiwanese students’ science learning self-efficacy and teacher and student science hardiness: a multilevel model approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(4), 537–555. doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0285-2
- Watermeyer, R. (2012). Confirming the legitimacy of female participation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (SCIENCE): Evaluation of a UK SCIENCE initiative for girls. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(5), 679–700. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.678751
- Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
- Young, D., Rudman, L., Buettner, H., & McLean, M. (2013). The influence of female role models on women’s implicit science cognitions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 283–292. doi:10.1177/0361684313482109
- Zeldin, A., Britner, S., & Pajares, F. (2008). A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1036–1058. doi:10.1002/tea.20195
- Zeldin, A., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215–246. doi:10.2307/1163477