Turning Around the Question of ‘Transfer’ in Education: Tracing the sociomaterial

References

• Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2010). Taking-place. Non-representational theories and geography. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28, 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2004). The force of things: Steps towards an ecology of matter. Political Theory, 32, 347–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, A., & Jensen, T. E. (2011). Bruno Latour: Hybrid thoughts in a hybrid world. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching: Communities, activities and networks Edwards R. Biesta G. Thorpe M. Routledge Abingdon 2009
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Clarke, J. (2002). Flexible learning, spatiality and identity. Studies in Continuing Education, 24, 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Miller, K. (2007). Putting the context into learning. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15, 263–274.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2011). Considering materiality in educational policy: Messy objects and multiple reals. Educational Theory, 61, 709–726.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7, 329–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. (2012). Becoming worldly ‘with’ in early childhood: Finding my way with Haraway. Members’ Briefing Paper 11.1. Retrieved from http://www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/ceiec/resources/Members%20Briefing%2011_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, E., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (2007). The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P., & Hodkinson, P. (2009). Moving beyond the metaphor of transfer of learning. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 619–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P. (2005). Reconceptualising the relations between college-based and workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17, 521–532.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 525–542.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Barad: Thinking with intra-action. Thinking with theory in qualitative research (pp. 118–136). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (2006). A geography of big things. Cultural Geographies, 13, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B. (2004). A nonhumanist disposition: On performativity, practical ontology, and intervention. Configurations, 12, 229–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10, 205–229.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3, 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity, 379-395. Retrieved from http://heterogeneities.net/publications/Law1992NotesOnTheTheoryOfTheActorNetwork.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009a). Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (3rd ed.). (pp. 141–158). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009b). The Greer–Bush test: On politics in STS. Retrieved from http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2009TheGreer-BushTest.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2011a). Assembling the baroque. Retrieved from http://www.cresc.ac.uk/publications/assembling-the-baroque
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2011b). Heterogeneous engineering and tinkering. Retrieved from http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2011HeterogeneousEngineeringAndTinkering.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2011c). What’s wrong with a one-world world? Retrieved from http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2011WhatsWrongWithAOneWorldWorld.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2000). Performing technology’s stories: On social constructivism, performance, and performativity. Technology and Culture, 41, 765–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macknight, V. (2011). Maths teaching methods: Relational abstracting as a hidden metaphysics. Science as Culture, 20, 455–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Lezaun, J. (2011). Materials and devices of the public: An introduction. Economy and Society, 40, 489–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, I. (2008). Making Alzheimer’s disease matter: Enacting, interfering and doing politics of nature. Geoforum, 39, 98–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in practice. Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13, 249–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of practice. Time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (2008). New ontologies. In A. Pickering, & K. Guzik (Eds.), The mangle in practice. Science, society, and becoming (pp. 1–14). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. (1993). Review: Personal development and intellectual biography—The case of Robert Boyle. British Journal for the History of Science, 26, 335–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E. (2012). The mind and distributed cognition: The place of knowing in a maths class. Theory & Psychology, 22, 717–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spenceley, L. (2006). ‘Smoke and mirrors’: An examination of the concept of professionalism within the FE sector. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 11, 289–302.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2000). It’s the little things. In K. Dodds, & D. Atkinson (Eds.), Geopolitical traditions: A century of geopolitical thought (pp. 380–387). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Conceptualising transfer: From standard notions to developmental perspectives. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn, & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing (pp. 19–38). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Verran, H. (2007). The telling challenge of Africa’s economies. African Studies Review, 50, 163–182.
   Google Scholar