Re/assembling ‘innovative’ learning environments: Affective practice and its politics

References

• Anderson, K., & Perrin, C. (2015). New materialism and the stuff of humanism. Australian Humanities Review, 58, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Boddington, A., & Boys, J. (Eds.). (2011). Re-shaping learning: A critical reader – The future of learning spaces in post-compulsory education. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2014). Making the case for space: The effect of learning spaces on teaching and learning. Curriculum and Teaching, 29, 5–19.10.7459/ct/29.1.02
   Google Scholar
• Catholic Education Office, Melbourne. (2009). Contemporary learning 2009–2013. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., & Montini, T. (1993). The many faces of RU486: Tales of situated knowledges and technological contestations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18, 42–78.10.1177/016224399301800104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman, F. (2010). Affect. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (2nd ed., pp. 11–14). Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.
   Google Scholar
• Conradson, D., & Mckay, D. (2007). Translocal subjectivities: Mobility, connection, emotion. Mobilities, 2, 167–174.10.1080/17450100701381524
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2014). Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 734–741.10.1177/1077800414530256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009a). Building schools in the 21st century and current thinking about learning for a lifetime. Melbourne: The State Government of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2009b). Pedagogy and space: Transforming learning through innovation. Melbourne: State of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (2010). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A., & Crowley, V. (2010). Disability matters: Pedagogy, media and affect. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31, 399–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R., Zapasnik, J., McCann, H., & Bruce, M. (2013). All those little machines: Assemblage as transformative theory. Australian Humanities Review, 55, 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2011). Heterogeneous engineering and tinkering. Retrieved from http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2011HeterogeneousEngineeringAndTinkering.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34, 329–394.10.3102/0091732X09358129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. (2003). Making spaces: Teacher workplace topologies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 11, 353–377.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. (2004). Space power and the classroom. Forum, 46, 13–18.10.2304/forum
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education Employment Training and Youth Affairs (MYCEETYA). (2008). Learning spaces framework: Learning in an online world. Carlton South.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (2015). Re/assembling spaces of learning in Victorian government schools: Policy enactments, pedagogic encounters and micropolitics. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36, 500–514. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.978616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (2016). Policy matters: De/re/territorialising spaces of learning in Victorian government schools. Journal of Education Policy, 31, 81–97. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1099077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D., & Witcomb, A. (in press). Affective practices of learning at the museum: Children’s critical encounters with the past. In L. Smith & M. Wetherell (Eds.), Emotion, affective practices and the past in the present. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). 21st century learning environments. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Innovative learning environments. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68, 749–771.10.1007/s10734-014-9742-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. (2012). ‘I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess’: Becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory. Philosophia, 2, 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2012). Affective spaces: A praxeological outlook. Rethinking History, 16, 241–258.10.1080/13642529.2012.681193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veloso, L., Duarte, A., & Marques, J. (2013). Changing education through the transformation of learning spaces: Analysis of the secondary schools modernisation programme in Portugal. Paper presented at the The European Conference on Education 2013. Retrieved from http://iafor.org/archives/offprints/ece2013-offprints/ECE2013_0152.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. (2010). Desiring recognition, accumulating affect. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 269–285). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, J. A., & Snaza, N. (2016). Against methodocentrism in educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–11. doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1140015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781446250945
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2013). Feeling rules, atmospheres and affective practice: Some reflections on the analysis of emotional episodes. In P. Aggleton & C. Maxwell (Eds.), Privilege, agency and affect: Understanding the production and effects of action (pp. 221–239). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137292636
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2015). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society, 21, 139–166.10.1177/1357034X14539020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., McCreanor, T., McConville, A., Barnes, H. M., & le Grice, J. (2015). Settling space and covering the nation: Some conceptual considerations in analysing affect and discourse. Emotion, Space and Society, 16, 56–64.10.1016/j.emospa.2015.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism?. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2016). Making sense of the complex entanglement between emotion and pedagogy: Contributions of the affective turn. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 539–550. doi:10.1007/s11422-014-9623-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar