The unexamined student is not worth teaching: preparation, the zone of proximal development, and the Socratic Model of Scaffolded Learning

References

• Ahbel-Rappe, S., & Kametekar, R. (Eds.). (2009). A companion to Socrates. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, H. (2000). Socratic wisdom: The model of knowledge in Plato’s early dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, H. (2010). Socratic method. In Morrison (pp. 179–200).
   Google Scholar
• Biondi, C. (2008). Socratic teaching: Beyond the paper chase. Teaching Philosophy, 31, 119–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickhouse, T. C., & Smith, N. D. (2000). The philosophy of Socrates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, Possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with a hypermedia-supported student-centered learning activity. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 333–356.
   Google Scholar
• Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Burnyeat, M. F. (1977). Socratic midwifery, platonic inspiration. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 24, 7–16.10.1111/bics.1977.24.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Coe, C. (2011). Scaffolded writing as a tool for critical thinking: Teaching beginning students how to write arguments. Teaching Philosophy, 34, 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concepción, D. (2014). Engaging novices: Transparent alignment, flow and controlled failure. In E. Esch, K. Hernberg, & R. Kraft, Jr. (Eds.), Philosophy through teaching (pp. 129–136). Charlottesville, VA: Philosophy Documentation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Concepción, D. (2004). Reading philosophy with background knowledge and metacognition. Teaching Philosophy, 27, 351–368.10.5840/teachphil200427443
   Google Scholar
• Colter, R., & Ulatowski, J. (2015). Freeing Meno’s slave boy: Scaffolded learning in the philosophy classroom. Teaching Philosophy, 38, 21–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. M. (Ed.). (1997). Plato: Collected works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. (1992). Inquiry in the Meno. In R. Kraut (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Plato (pp. 200–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521430186
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. (1999a). Knowledge and belief in republic 5-7. In Fine (pp. 215–246).
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. (1999b). Plato 1: Metaphysics and epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, G. (2014). The possibility of inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577392.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kraut, R. (1992). Introduction to the study of Plato. In R. Kraut (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Plato (pp. 1–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521430186
   Google Scholar
• Lipscomb, L., Swanson, J., & West, A. (2004). Scaffolding. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology. Retrieved 30 August 2012, from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, A. (2009). From grade school to law school; Socrates’ legacy in education. In Ahbel-Rappe & Kametekar (pp. 476–492).
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, J. (1994). Learning as recollection. In J. M. Day (Ed.), Plato’s Meno in focus (pp. 112–128). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, D. (Ed.). (2010). The Cambridge companion to Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nehamas, A. (1998). Meno’s paradox and Socrates as teacher. In A. Nehamas (Ed.), Virtues of authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates (pp. 3–26). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 77–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D. (1995). Recollection and experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597374
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. (2006). Plato's meno. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, K., & Klein, J. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35, 41–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2014). Scaffolding deep reading instruction. In E. Esch, K. Hernberg, & R. Kraft, Jr. (Eds.), Philosophy through teaching (pp. 109–115). Charlottesville, VA: Philosophy Documentation Center.
   Google Scholar
• VanLier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. New York, NY: Longmans Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vlastos, G. (1965). Anamnesis in the Meno. Dialogue, 4, 143–167.10.1017/S0012217300033539
   Google Scholar
• Vlastos, G. (1983). The Socratic elenchus. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy I, 27–58.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1987). The collected works of Lev Vygotsky, Vol. 1. Translated by Sobranie Sachinelli. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations (50th Anniversary ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar