1,517
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The contribution of the ontological turn in education: Some methodological and political implications

References

  • Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Alberti, B., Fowles, S., Holbraad, M., Marshall, Y., & Witmore, C. (2011). “Worlds otherwise”: Archaeology, anthropology, and ontological difference. Current Anthropology, 52, 896–912.10.1086/662027
  • Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2010). The promise of non-representational theories. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking place: Non-representational theories and geography (pp. 1–34). Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822388128
  • Barad, K. (2012). What is the measure of nothingness? Infinity, virtuality, justice. Osfildern: Hatje Cantz.
  • Bazzul, J., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Toward a social ontology for science education: Introducing Deleuze and Guattari’s assemblages. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 48, 284–299.
  • Biesta, G. (2005). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
  • Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
  • Biesta, G. (2013). Receiving the gift of teaching: From ‘Learning From’ to ‘Being Taught By’. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32, 449–461.10.1007/s11217-012-9312-9
  • Biesta, G. (2015). Living together beyond learning. Paper presented at the Learning to Live in Culturally Diverse Societies Conference, University of South Australia, Adelaide.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Brown, G. (2009). The ontological turn in education: The place of the learning environment. Journal of Critical Realism, 8, 5–34.10.1558/jocr.v8i1.5
  • Childers, S. (2013). The materiality of fieldwork: An ontology of feminist becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 599–609.10.1080/09518398.2013.786845
  • Course, M. (2010). Of words and fog: Linguistic relativity and Amerindian ontology. Anthropological Theory, 10, 247–263.10.1177/1463499610372177
  • Dahlbeck, J. (2014). Towards a pure ontology: Children’s bodies and morality. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 46, 8–23.
  • Dall’ Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2007). An ontological turn for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 679–691.10.1080/03075070701685130
  • Davies, B. (2014). Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 734–741.10.1177/1077800414530256
  • de Freitas, E., & Curinga, M. (2015). New materialist approaches to the study of language and identity: Assembling the posthuman subject. Curriculum Inquiry, 45, 249–265.10.1080/03626784.2015.1031059
  • de Freitas, E., & Ferrara, F. (2015). Movement, memory and mathematics: Henri Bergson and the ontology of learning. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 34, 565–585.10.1007/s11217-014-9455-y
  • de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139600378
  • de Landa, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. New York, NY: Continuum.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (G. Burchell & H. Tomlinson, Trans.). London: Verso.
  • Edwards, R. (2012). Theory matters: Representation and experimentation in education. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 44, 522–534.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00719.x
  • Escobar, A. (2007). The ‘ontological turn’ in social theory. A commentary on ‘Human geography without scale’, by Sallie Marston, John Paul Jones II and Keith Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32, 106–111.10.1111/tran.2007.32.issue-1
  • Fendler, L. (2014). The ethics of materiality: Some insights from non-representational theory for educational research. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Materialities in educational research (pp. 115–132). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Fendler, L., & Smeyers, P. (2015). Focusing on presentation instead of representation: Perspectives on representational and non-representational language-games for educational history and theory. Pedagogica Historica, 51, 691–701. doi:10.1080/00309230.2015.1058829
  • Fleck, L. (1935/1981). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822386551
  • Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.1007/978-94-017-0475-5
  • Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13, 147–161.10.1177/1464700112442643
  • Henare, A., Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (2007). Thinking through things: Theorizing artifacts ethnographically. New York, NY: Routldge.
  • Hojgaard, L., & Sondergaard, D. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology, 21, 338–354.10.1177/0959354309359965
  • Holbraad, M. (2010). Ontology is just another word for culture: Against the motion (2). Critique of Anthropology, 30, 179–185.
  • Holbraad, M. (2012). Truth in motion: The recursive anthropology of Cuban divination. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226349220.001.0001
  • Holbraad, M., Pedersen, M., & Viveiros de Castro, E. (2014). The politics of ontology: Anthropological positions. Cultural Anthropology. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from http://culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions
  • Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 525–542.10.1080/09518398.2010.500628
  • Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London: Routledge.
  • Joronen, M., & Häkli, J. (2016). Politicizing ontology. Progress in Human Geography, 1–19. doi:10.1177/0309132516652953
  • Laidlaw, J. (2012). Ontologically challenged. Anthropology of This Century (4). Retrieved April 19, 2016, from http://aotcpress.com/articles/ontologically-challenged/
  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory, 13, 265–281.10.1177/1464700112456001
  • Lenz Taguchi, H., & Palmer, A. (2013). A more ‘livable’ school? A diffractive analysis of the performative enactments of girls’ ill-/well-being with(in) school environments. Gender and Education, 25, 671–687.10.1080/09540253.2013.829909
  • MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 658–667.10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
  • Marres, N. (2009). Testing powers of engagement: Green living experiments, the ontological turn and the undoability of involvement. European Journal of Social Theory, 12, 117–133.10.1177/1368431008099647
  • Marres, N. (2013). Why political ontology must be experimentalized: On eco-show homes as devices of participation. Social Studies of Science, 43, 417–443.10.1177/0306312712475255
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge.
  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822384151
  • Murris, K. (2016). The posthuman child: Educational transformation through philosophy with picturebooks. London: Routledge.
  • Newton, P., & Riveros, A. (2015). Toward an ontology of practices in educational administration: Theoretical implications for research and practice. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 47, 330–341.10.1080/00131857.2014.976927
  • OECD. (1997). Lifelong learning for all. Paris: CERI.
  • Paleček, M., & Risjord, M. (2012). Relativism and the ontological turn within anthropology. Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 43, 3–23.
  • Petersen, M. (2012). Common nonsense: A review of certain recent reviews of the ‘ontological turn’. Anthropology of This Century ( 5). Retrieved April 19, 2016, from http://aotcpress.com/articles/common_nonsense/
  • Pickering, A. (in press). The ontological turn: Taking different worlds seriously. Social Analysis.
  • Pina-Cabral, J. (2014). World: An anthropological examination (part 1). Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1). Retrieved April 19, 2016, from http://www.haujournal.org/index.php/hau/article/view/hau4.1.002/643
  • Povinelli, E. (2011). Economies of abandonment: Social belonging and endurance in late liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822394570
  • Riveros, A., & Viczko, M. (2015). The enactment of professional learning policies: Performativity and multiple ontologies. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36, 533–547.
  • Säfström, C. A., & Månsson, N. (2015). The ontology of learning, or teaching the non-person to learn. Interacções, 37, 66–82.
  • Sismondo, S. (2015). Ontological turns, turnoffs and roundabouts. Social Studies of Science, 45(3), 441–448.
  • Sivado, A. (2015). The shape of things to come? Reflections on the ontological turn in anthropology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 45, 83–99.10.1177/0048393114524830
  • St. Pierre, E. (2016). The empirical and the new empiricisms. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 111–124.10.1177/1532708616636147
  • Thrift, N. (1996). Spatial formations. London: Sage.
  • Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space/ politics/affect. London: Routledge.
  • Vigh, H., & Sausdal, D. (2014). From essence back to existence: Anthropology beyond the ontological turn. Anthropological Theory, 14, 49–74.
  • Viveiros de Castro, E. (2011). Zeno and the art of anthropology: Of lies, beliefs, paradoxes, and other truths. Common Knowledge, 17, 128–145.10.1215/0961754X-2010-045
  • Viveiros de Castro, E. (2012). Cosmologies: Perspectivism. HAU Masterclass Series, 1, 45–168.
  • Zembylas, M. (2007). Risks and pleasures: A Deleuzo-Guattarian pedagogy of desire in education. British Journal of Educational Research, 33, 331–347.
  • Zembylas, M. (2014). Theorizing ‘difficult knowledge’ in the aftermath of the ‘affective turn’: Implications for curriculum and pedagogy in handling traumatic representations. Curriculum Inquiry, 44, 390–412.
  • Zembylas, M. (2016). The contribution of non-representational theories in education: Some affective, ethical and political Implications. Studies in Philosophy and Education.  doi:10.1007/s11217-016-9535-2

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.