Neither end, nor means, but both—why the modern university ought to be responsive to different conceptions of the good

References

• Anderson, E. (2004). Rethinking equality of opportunity. Comment on Adam Swift’s how not to be a hypocrite. Theory and Research in Education, 2, 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2007). Fair opportunity in education: A democratic equality perspective. Ethics, 117, 595–622.10.1086/518806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, M. (2006). Bachelor of what, master of whom? The Humboldt myth and historical transformation of higher education in German-speaking Europe and the US. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 245–267.10.1111/ejed.2006.41.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. (2012). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I. (1998). Justifying the evaluative state: New public management ideals in higher education. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 245–267.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1985). The impartial spectator goes to Washington: Toward a Smithian theory of electoral behavior. Economics and Philosophy, 1, 189–211.10.1017/S0266267100002467
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Pettit, P. (1990). Unveiling the vote. British Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 313–333.
   Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H. (2003). School choice and social justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H., & Swift, A. (2006). Equality, priority, and positional goods. Ethics, 116, 471–497.10.1086/500524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curren, R. (2009). Education as a social right in a diverse society. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(1), 45–56.10.1111/jope.2009.43.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, H., & Stensaker, B. (2007). An internal representative system: The democratic vision. In P. Maassen & J. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and european integration (pp. 99–119). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic authority. A philosophical framework. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. (1997). Equality and respect. Social Research, 64(1), 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiman, C. (2014). Priority and position. Philosophical studies, 167, 341–360.10.1007/s11098-013-0099-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (2003). Autonomy, gender, politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195138503.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A. (1999). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400822911
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. (1969). Rational choice models of behavior versus functionist and conformist theories. World Politics, 22, 513–538.10.2307/2009665
   Google Scholar
• Haverhals, B. (2007). The normative foundations of research. Philosophical notes on the transformation of the modern university ideas. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26, 419–432.10.1007/s11217-007-9053-3
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, F. (2005). Social limit to growth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hohendahl, P. U. (2011). Humboldt revisited: Liberal education, university reform, and the opposition to the neoliberal University. New German Critique, 38(2), 159–196.10.1215/0094033X-1221812
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (2003). Condiția postmodernă. (Ciprian Mihali Trans.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miroiu, A. (2006). Fundamentele politicii (I) [The fundamentals of politics]. Iași: Polirom.
   Google Scholar
• Nybom, T. (2007). A rule-governed community of scholars: The Humboldt vision in the history of the European University. In P. Maassen & J. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 55–81). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5971-1
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. In P. Maassen & J. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–55). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5971-1
   Google Scholar
• Paroush, J. (1998). Stay away from fair coins: A Condorcet jury theorem. Social Choice and Welfar, 15, 15–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quong, J. (2004). The rights of unreasonable citizens. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(3), 314–335.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00202.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness. A restatement. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (2004a). Academic capitalism in the new economy: Challenges and choices. American Academic, 1(1), 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (2004b). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state and higher education. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruegg, W. (2004). Themes. In W. Ruegg (Ed.), A history of the university in Europe III (pp. 3–33). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruegg, W. (2011). Themes. In W. Ruegg (Ed.), A history of the university in Europe IV (pp. 3–29). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Satz, D. (2007). Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship. Ethics, 117, 623–648.10.1086/518805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (2001). Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism. Organization, 8(2), 154–161.10.1177/1350508401082003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift, A. (2003). How not to be a hypocrite. School choice for the morally perplexed parent. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Voigt, K. (2007). Individual choice and unequal participation in higher education. Theory and Research in education, 5(1), 87–112.
   Google Scholar