Can creativity be taught?

References

• Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. (1958). Thinking: An experimental and social study. London: Allen and Unwin
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. (2002). The free-market innovation machine: Analyzing the growth machine of capitalism. Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, M. C. (1975). Thinking straight: Principles of reasoning for readers and writers. Englewood Cliffs: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, T., Scull, J., Hattie, J., Clinton, J., Larkins, G., … Arnup, J. (2016). Issues in Educational Research. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299470048_Conducting_psychological_assessments_in_schools_Adapting_for_converging_skills_and_expanding_knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, C. (2007). Elizabeth Blackburn and the story of telomeres. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, L. (1960). The Annotated Alice: Alice’s adventures in Wonderland & Through the looking glass, (Introduction Gardner, M.). New York: Bramhall House.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., & Nye, A. (2017). ‘Surprise Me!’ The (im)possibilities of agency and creativity within the standards framework of history education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 656–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchamp, M. (1957). Session on the Creative Act, Convention of the American Federation of the Arts, Houston
   Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100. doi:10.2307/41165746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking. Retrieved from http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents/TheNatureofCriticalThinking_51711_000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fordham, M. (2017). Tradition, authority and disciplinary practice in history education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 631–642. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1135777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D., & Bessant, J. (2005). Targeting innovation and implications for capacity development. Technovation, 25(3), 171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Grierson, E. (2016). Activating the creative arts and technology for a globally digital economy: Provocations and challenges for a new philosophy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(13), 1299–1309. doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1239351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harre, R. (1979). Social being: A theory for social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, F. (2007, December). Creativity, the arts and toxic institutions. Proceedings, Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia Conference, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.pesa.org.au/html/04cal.htm
   Google Scholar
• Howe, M. J. A. (1999). Genius explained. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, S. H. (2017). Rethinking creativity: Present in expression in creative learning communities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(3), 220–230. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2016.1225559
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kotzee, B. (2016). Learning how. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(2), 218–232. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewkes, J., Sawyers, D., & Stillerman, R. (1958). The sources of invention. London: Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1979). Social science methodology as the ideology of bureaucratic authority. In M. J. Falco (Ed.), Through the looking glass: Epistemology and the conduct of enquiry. Washington DC: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. D. (2009). Revisiting the task/achievement analysis of teaching in neo‐liberal times. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 79–90. doi:10.1111/.1469-5812.2007.00338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. (2018). Preparing Our Youth for an Inclusive and Sustainable World: The OECD PISA global competence framework. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/Handbook-PISA-2018-Global-Competence.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/creativity).
   Google Scholar
• Plato (380 BCE). Meno, (Trans. B. Jowett). Retrieved from http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/meno.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, R. (2017). In Delaware, creating pathways and opportunities for youth. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(3), 19–24. doi:10.1177/0031721717739588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1976). Reasoning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, E., Lucas, B., & Claxton, G. (2012). Progression in creativity: Developing new forms of assessment—Final Research Report. Newcastle: Creativity, Culture and Education. Retrieved from http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/progression-in-creativity-developing-new-forms-of-assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 83–100. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.83
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2017). Testing for better “and” worse. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(0 ), 66–71. doi:10.1177/0031721716681780
   Google Scholar
• Tlili, A. (2016). Encountering the creative museum: Museographic creativeness and the bricolage of time materials. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(5), 443–458. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1031068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar