Exceeding expectations: scaffolding agentic engagement through assessment as learning

References

• Absolum, Michael, Lester Flockton, John Hattie, Rosemay Hipkins, and Ian Reid. 2009. Directions for Assessment in New Zealand: Developing Students’ Assessment Capabilities. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Alivernini, Fabio, and Fabio Lucidi. 2011. “Relationship between Social Context, Self-Efficacy, Motivation, Academic Achievement, and Intention to Drop out of High School: A Longitudinal Study.” The Journal of Educational Research 104 (4): 241–252. doi:10.1080/00220671003728062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ary, Donald, Lucy Cheser Jacobs, Chris Sorensen, and David A. Walker. 2014. Introduction to Research in Education. 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Assessment Reform Group (ARG). 2002. Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). 2011. “About ICSEA Factsheet.” Accessed July 3, 2012. http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/About__ICSEA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). 2015. “Australian Curriculum V.8 F-10: General Capabilities.” Accessed 3 December, 2015. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/generalcapabilities/critical-and-creative-thinking/introduction/introduction
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2007. “National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.” Accessed 26 July, 2016. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e72
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action : A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert. 2001. “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 52 (1): 1–26.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert. 2006. “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2): 164–180. doi:10.2307/40212163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert. 2012. “On the Functional Properties of Perceived Self-Efficacy Revisited.” Journal of Management 38 (1): 9–44. doi:10.1177/0149206311410606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bembenutty, Héfner. 2011. “Academic Delay of Gratification and Academic Achievement.” In Self-Regulated Learning, edited by Héfner Bembenutty, 55–65. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Randy Elliot. 2011. “Formative Assessment: A Critical Review.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18 (1): 5–25. doi:10.1080/0969594x.2010.513678.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Paul, and Dylan Wiliam. 1998. “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment.” The Phi Delta Kappan 80 (2): 139–148. doi:10.2307/20439383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Paul, Christine Harrison, Clare Lee, Bethan Marshall, and Dylan Wiliam. 2003. Assessment for Learning: Putting It into Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, Patricia. 2007. An Introduction to Assessment. London: Continuum International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Gavin T. L., and Lois R. Harris. 2013. “Student Self-Assessment.” In SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment: SAGE Publications, edited by James H. McMillan, 367–393. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, Margaret. 2008. “Can Assessment Unlock and Open the Doors to Resourcefulness and Agency?” In Unlocking Assessment: Understanding for Reflection and Application, edited by Sue Swaffield, 36–54. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Considine, Gillian, and Gianni Zappala. 2002. “The Influence of Social and Economic Disadvantage in the Academic Performance of School Students in Australia.” Journal of Sociology 38 (2): 129–148. doi:10.1177/144078302128756543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, Terry J. 1988. “The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students.” Review of Educational Research 58 (4): 438–481. doi:10.2307/1170281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dann, Ruth. 2002. Promoting Assessment as Learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.10.4324/9780203470152
   Google Scholar
• Dann, Ruth. 2014. “Assessment as Learning: Blurring the Boundaries of Assessment and Learning for Theory, Policy and Practice.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 21 (2): 149–166. doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.898128.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Children’s Services. 2009. Northern Territory Curriculum Framework: English. Accessed 2 December, 2010. http://www.education.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/2381/english_writing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dignath, Charlotte, and Gerhard Büttner. 2008. “Components of Fostering Self-Regulated Learning among Students. a Meta-Analysis on Intervention Studies at Primary and Secondary School Level.” Metacognition Learning 3 (3): 231–264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, Lorna M. 2003. Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, Lorna M. 2013. Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, Lorna M., and Steven Katz. 2008. “Getting to the Core of Learning: Using Assessment for Self-Monitoring and Self-Regulation.” In Unlocking Assessment: Understanding for Reflection and Application, edited by Sue Swaffield, 90–104. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, Andrew J., and Carol S. Dweck. 2005. “Competence, Motivation, and Identity Development during Adolescence.” In Handbook of Competence and Motivation, edited by Andrew J. Elliot and Carol S. Dweck, 3–12. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Anna K. 2015. “Student-Directed Assessment as a Learning Process for Primary Students: A Mixed-Methods Study.” Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Faculty of Law, Education and Business, Charles Darwin University, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Anna K., and Greg Shaw. 2011. “How Voice-Recognition Software Presents a Useful Transcription Tool for Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researchers.” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 5 (2): 200–206. doi:10.5172/mra.2011.5.2.200.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, Wynne. 2009. “Improving assessment of learning and for learning.” Education 3-13 37 (3): 247–257. doi:10.1080/03004270802442334.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, Wynne, and Mary James. 1997. “Assessment and Learning: Differences and Relationships between Formative and Summative Assessment.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 4 (3): 365–379.10.1080/0969594970040304
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, John. 2009. Visible Learning : A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, John. 2012. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, John, and Helen Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessey, Beth A., and T. M. Amabile. 2010. “Creativity.” Annual Review of Psychology 61 (1): 569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, Anne, and Richard K. Coll. 2009. “Assessment of Learning, for Learning, and as Learning: New Zealand Case Studies.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 16 (3): 269–290. doi:10.1080/09695940903319661.
   Google Scholar
• Isen, Alice M., and Johnmarshall Reeve. 2005. “The Influence of Positive Affect on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: Facilitating Enjoyment of Play, Responsible Work Behavior, and Self-Control.” Motivation & Emotion 29 (4): 295–323. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9019-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, James. C., and Ronald. A. Beghetto. 2013. “In Praise of Clark Kent: Creative Metacognition and the Importance of Teaching Kids When (Not) to Be Creative.” Roeper Review 35 (3):155–165. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2013.799413.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, David. 2002. “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41 (4): 212–218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankshear, Colin, and Michele Knobel. 2004. A Handbook for Teacher Research: From Design to Implementation. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Woogul, Myung-Jin Lee, and Mimi Bong. 2014. “Testing Interest and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Academic Self-Regulation and Achievement.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 39 (2): 86–99. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, Krista D., and Emily J. Shaw. 2010. “A Look beyond Cognitive Predictors of Academic Success: Understanding the Relationship between Academic Self-Beliefs and Outcomes.” Journal of College Student Development 51 (6): 665–678.10.1353/csd.2010.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKew, Maxine. 2014. Class Act: Ending the Education Wars. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, Daniel, Leonidas Kyriakides, Greetje van der Werf, Bert Creemers, Helen Timperley, and Lorna Earl. 2014. “State of the Art – Teacher Effectiveness and Professional Learning.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 25 (2): 231–256. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niehaus, Kate, Kathleen Moritz Rudasill, and Jill L. Adelson. 2012. “Self-Efficacy, Intrinsic Motivation, and Academic Outcomes among Latino Middle School Students Participating in an after-School Program.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 34 (1): 118–136. doi:10.1177/0739986311424275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrenoud, Philippe. 1998. “From Formative Evaluation to a Controlled Regulation of Learning Processes. towards a Wider Conceptual Field.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 85–102. doi:10.1080/0969595980050105.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, Paul R. 2004. “A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students.” Educational Psychology Review 16 (4): 385–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, James. 2008. Transformative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
   Google Scholar
• Punch, Keith F. 2009. Introduction to Research Methods in Education. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putwain, David W., Laura J. Nicholson, and Jenna L. Edwards. 2016. “Hard to Reach and Hard to Teach: Supporting the Self-regulation of Learning in an Alternative Provision Secondary School.” Educational Studies 42 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/03055698.2015.1108839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, Johnmarshall. 2012. “A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by Sandra L. Christenson, Amy L. Reschly and Cathy Wylie, 149–172. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, Johnmarshall. 2013. “How Students Create Motivationally Supportive Learning Environments for Themselves: The Concept of Agentic Engagement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (3): 579–595. doi:10.1037/a0032690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, Johnmarshall, and Ching-Mei Tseng. 2011. “Agency as a Fourth Aspect of Students’ Engagement during Learning Activities.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (4): 257–267. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. Royce. 2007. “Perils in the Meticulous Specification of Goals and Assessment Criteria.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14 (3): 387–392. doi:10.1080/09695940701592097.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, Jaap. 2014. “School, Teaching, and System Effectiveness: Some Comments on Three State-of-the-Art Reviews.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 25 (2): 282–290. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, Dale H. 1985. “Participation in Goal Setting: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Skills of Learning-Disabled Children.” Journal of Special Education 19 (3): 307–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, Dale H. 1995. “Self-Efficacy and Education and Instruction.” In Self-Efficacy, Adaption, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application, edited by C. R. Snyder, 281–303. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, Dale H., and Carol A. Mullen. 2012. “Self-Efficacy as an Engaged Learner.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by Sandra L. Christenson, Amy L. Reschly and Cathy Wylie, 219–235. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, Dale H., and Frank Pajares. 2005. “Competence Perceptions and Academic Functioning.” In Handbook of Competence and Motivation, edited by Andrew J. Elliot and Carol S. Dweck, 85–105. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, Dale H., and Frank Pajares. 2009. “Self-Efficacy Theory.” In Handbook of Motivation at School, edited by K. R. Wentzel and Allan Wigfield, 35–53. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stankov, Lazar, Suzanne Morony, and Yim Ping Lee. 2013. “Confidence: The Best Non-Cognitive Predictor of Academic Achievement?” Educational Psychology 34 (1): 9–28. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.814194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, Harry. 2007. “Assessment as Learning? How the Use of Explicit Learning Objectives, Assessment Criteria and Feedback in Post-Secondary Education and Training Can Come to Dominate Learning. 1.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14 (3): 281–294. doi:10.1080/09695940701591867.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, Dylan. 2011. Embedded Formative Assessment. Bloomington, IL: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Lisa A., and David DeSteno. 2008. “Pride and Perseverance: The Motivational Role of Pride.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (6): 1007–1017. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Barry J. 2011. “Motivational Sources and Outcomes of Self-Regulated Learning and Performance.” In Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, edited by Barry J. Zimmerman and Dale H. Schunk, 49–64. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar