Innovation, evaluation design and typologies of professional learning

References

• Biesta, G. J. 2010. “Why ‘What Works’ Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 29 (5): 491–503. doi:10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boylan, M., M. Coldwell, B. Maxwell, and J. Jordan. 2018. “Rethinking Models of Professional Learning as Tools: A Conceptual Analysis to Inform Research and Practice.” Professional Development in Education 44 (1): 120–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., E. Fennema, P. L. Peterson, C.-P. Chiang, and M. Loef. 1989. “Using Knowledge of Children’s Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study.” American Educational Research Journal 26 (4): 499–531. doi:10.3102/00028312026004499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., and H. Hollingsworth. 2002. “Elaborating a Model of Teacher Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (8): 947–967. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldwell, Mike and Tim Simkins. 2011. “Level models of continuing professional development evaluation: A grounded review and critique.” Professional development in education 37 (1): 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Coldwell, M., T. Greany, S. Higgins, C. Brown, B. Maxwell, B. Stiell, L. Stoll, B. Willis, H. Burns. 2017. Evidence-Informed Teaching: An Evaluation of Progress in England. Research Report. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• CONSORT. 2010. “Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 Statement and Checklist.” http://www.consort-statement.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P., M. Bell, B. Rundell, and D. Evans. 2003. “The Impact of Collaborative CPD on Classroom Teaching and Learning.” In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPICentre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P., S. Higgins, T. Greany, N. Buckler, D. Coles-Jordan, B. Crisp, L. Saunders, and R. Coe. 2015. Developing Great Teaching: Lessons from the International Reviews into Effective Professional Development. London: Teacher Development Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, Michael S., Andrew C. Porter, Laura Desimone, Beatrice F. Birman, and Kwang Suk Yoon. 2001 “What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers”. American Educational Research journal 38 (4): 915–945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow, R. E., E. Lichtenstein, and A. C. Marcus. 2003. “Why Don’t We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition.” American Journal of Public Health 93 (8): 1261–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldacre, B. 2013. “Building Evidence into Education.” http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/17530/7/ben%20goldacre%20paper_Redacted.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, L. T., H. M. Doerr, and C. C. Lewis. 2014. “Mathematics Teachers’ Learning: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Research.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 17 (1): 5–36. doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9245-4.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., N. Siddiqui, and B. H. See. 2015. Philosophy for Children: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Millbank: Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Support/Campaigns/Evaluation_Reports/EEF_Project_Report_PhilosophyForChildren.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2002. “Professional Development and Teacher Change.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 8 (3): 381–391. doi:10.1080/135406002100000512.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E. 2013. “Evaluating Change Processes: Assessing Extent of Implementation (Constructs, Methods and Implications).” Journal of Educational Administration 51 (3): 264–289. doi:10.1108/09578231311311474.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, N., and C. McCaig. 2017. “Examining the Epistemology of Impact and Success of Educational Interventions Using a Reflective Case Study of University Bursaries.” British Educational Research Journal 43 (2): 290–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, L., O. Service, B. Goldacre, and D. Torgerson. 2012. Test, Learn, Adapt: Developing Public Policy with Randomised Controlled Trials. London HMSO Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/test-learn-adapt-developing-public-policy-with-randomised-controlled-trials.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, T. C., P. P. Glasziou, I. Boutron, R. Milne, R. Perera, D. Moher, D. G. Altman, et al. 2014. “Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (Tidier) Checklist and Guide.” BMJ 348: g1687. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, N., A. Lendrum, E. Ashworth, K. Frearson, R. Buck, and K. Kerr. 2016. Implementation and Process Evaluation (IPE) for Interventions in Educational Settings: An Introductory Handbook. London: EEF.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. 2005. “Models of Continuing Professional Development: A Framework for Analysis.” Journal of In-Service Education 31 (2): 235–250. doi:10.1080/13674580500200277.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. 2014. “Understanding Continuing Professional Development: The Need for Theory to Impact on Policy and Practice.” Professional Development in Education 40 (5): 688–697. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.955122.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, E. R. 2015. “What if ‘What Works’ Doesn’t?” Evaluation 21 (2): 167–172. doi:10.1177/1356389015577505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 1991. Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R., F. Weinhardt, G. Wyness, and H. Rolfe. 2017. Lesson Study: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. London: EEF. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Projects/Evaluation_Reports/Lesson_Study.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, J., and K. Jones. 2014. “Professional Learning or Professional Development? Or Continuing Professional Learning and Development? Changing Terminology, Policy and Practice.” Professional Development in Education 40 (5): 683–687. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.960688.
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D., and D. Pedder. 2011. “Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning.” Review of Educational Research 81 (3): 376–407. doi:10.3102/0034654311413609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. 2002. “Evidence-Based Policy: The Promise of ‘Realist Synthesis’.” Evaluation 8 (3): 340–358. doi:10.1177/135638902401462448.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. 2005. “Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula.” Review of Educational Research 75 (2): 211–246. doi:10.3102/00346543075002211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T., and M. B. Bryans. 2004. “Teachers’ Orientations toward Mathematics Curriculum Materials: Implications for Teacher Learning.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 35: 352–388. doi:10.2307/30034820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, P. M. 2005. “External Validity of Randomised Controlled Trials:‘To Whom Do the Results of This Trial Apply?’” The Lancet 365 (9453): 82–93. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 2011. “Skilling or Emancipating? Metaphors for Continuing Teacher Professional Development.” In Rethinking Educational Practice Through Reflexive Inquiry, 153–167. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B., M. Gearhart, and N. S. Nasir. 2001. “Enhancing Students’ Understanding of Mathematics: A Study of Three Contrasting Approaches to Professional Support.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 4 (1): 55–79. doi:10.1023/A:1009935100676.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., A. Harris, and G. Handscomb. 2012. Great Professional Development Which Leads to Great Pedagogy: Nine Claims from Research. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Tienken, Christopher H., and Charles M Achilles. 2003. “Changing Teacher Behavior and Improving Student Writing Achievement.” Planning and Changing 34: 153-168.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., A. Wilson, H. Barrar, and I. Fung. 2008. Teacher Professional Learning and Development. Wellington (NZ): Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, Helen, Aaron Wilson, Heather Barrar, and Irene Fung. 2007. “Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration.” New Zealand Ministry of Education .
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C. 2009. “Randomised Controlled Trials in Education Research: A Case Study of an Individually Randomised Pragmatic Trial.” Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education 37 (4): 313–321. doi:10.1080/03004270903099918.
   Google Scholar
• Wake, G., M. Swan, and C. Foster. 2016. “Professional Learning through the Collaborative Design of Problem-Solving Lessons.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 19 (2–3): 243–260. doi:10.1007/s10857-015-9332-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. 2015. “Why ‘What Works’ Doesn’t Work in Practice, and What Might Work Better.” In Proceedings of IMA International Conference on Barriers and Enablers to Learning Maths: Enhancing Learning and Teaching for All Learners, June 10–12, 2015, edited by M. A. Hersh and M. Kotecha. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. 1997. “Theory‐Based Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future.” New Directions for Evaluation 1997 (76): 41–55. doi:10.1002/ev.v1997:76.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, D. 2017. Does Lesson Study Work? A Look at the New EEF Trial. Teacher Development Trust. Accessed December 2017. http://tdtrust.org/blog.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, C., A. Oancea, and J. Orchard. 2015. “The Contribution of Educational Research to Teachers’ Professional Learning: Philosophical Understandings.” Oxford Review of Education 41 (2): 202–216. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1017406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., T. Duncan, S. W. Y. Lee, B. Scarloss, and K. L. Shapley. 2007. Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement. Issues & Answers. REL 2007-No. 033. San Antonio, Texas: Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest (NJ1).
   Google Scholar