Connections teachers make between creativity and arts learning

References

• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. 2012. “Curriculum: General Capabilities.” Accessed 1 June. http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/general_capabilities.html
   Google Scholar
• Bamford, A. 2006. The Wow Factor: Global Research Compendium on the Impact of the Arts in Education. Berlin: Waxman Münster.
   Google Scholar
• Bamford, A., and M. Wimmer. 2012. “The Role of Arts Education in Enhancing School Attractiveness: A Literature Review.” European Expert Network on Culture (EENC). http://www.kulturnibazar.si/data/upload/school_attractiveness_paper_final_website.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Banaji, S., A. Burn, and D. Buckingham. 2010. The Rhetorics of Creativity: A Literature Review. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Creativity, Culture & Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2014. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: UK Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. 1984. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain. 2nd ed. London: Longman Group.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B., and T. Vaughan. 2012. Transforming Education through the Arts. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, N., E. Oh, J. Kwon, H. Kim, E. Chi, and W. Hong. 2011. A Study on the Improvement of Secondary School Education to Bring up Students’ Creative Talents. Kice Research Report. Seoul: Korea: Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. 2000. Teaching Creativity: Philosophy and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. 2001. “Little C Creativity.” In Creativity in Education, edited by A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, and M. Leibling, 45–61. London: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. 2005. Creativity in Schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. 2011. “Approaches to Creativity in Education in the United Kingdom.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Creative Learning., edited by J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, and L. Bresler, 129–139. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. 1999. “Definitions of Creativity.” In Encyclopedia of Creativity, edited by M. A. Runco and S. Pritsker, 511–524. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. “The Domain of Creativity.” In Theories of Creativity, edited by M. Runco and R. Albert, 190–212. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihayli, M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discoveryand Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• De Bono, E. 1985. Six Thinking Hats. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. “Creativity in Schools in Europe: A Survey of Teachers.” http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC55645_Creativity%20Survey%20Brochure.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R. 2010. The Arts and Australian Education: Realising Potential, Australian Education Review. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fasko, D. 2006. “Creative Thinking and Reasoning.” In Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development, edited by J. C. Kaufman and J. Baer, 159–176. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., and M. Williams. 2004. Unlocking Creativity: Teaching across the Curriculum. Milton Park (Oxon): David Fulton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2014. The Creative Turn: Toward a New Aesthetic Imaginary. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2017. “Creative Ecologies: Fostering Creativity in Secondary Schools.” Accessed 3 March. https://www.creativeresearchhub.com/reports
   Google Scholar
• Harrow, A. 1972. A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. United Kingdom: Longman Group.
   Google Scholar
• Heilmann, G., and W. B. Korte. 2010. The Role of Creativity and Innovation in School Curricula in the Eu27: A Content Analysis of Curricula Documents. Luxembourg: European Commission: Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Imms, W., N. Jeanneret, and J. Stevens-Ballenger. 2012. “Partnerships between Schools and the Professional Arts Sector: Evaluation of the Impact on Student Outcomes.” Arts Victoria. Accessed 2 April. http://creative.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/56722/ARVI_Edu_Report_Web_FA-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., and A. Craft. 2006. “Creative Learning and Possibility Thinking.” In Creative Learning Practices: European Experiences, edited by B. Jeffery, 49–64. London: Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., and R. A. Beghetto. 2009. “Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity.” Review of General Psychology 13 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1037/a0013688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keamy, R. K. 2003. “Performing Masculinity and Leadership: Male Academics’ Work Practices and Identities.” Doctoral thesis., Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Keamy, R. K. 2016. “Creative Leadership? “It’s Just the Norm”.” School Leadership & Management 36 (2): 151–168. doi:10.1080/13632434.2016.1196173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozbelt, A., R. A. Beghetto, and M. A. Runco. 2010. “Theories of Creativity.” In Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, edited by J. C. Kaufman and R. J. Sternberg, 20–47. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D., B. Bloom, and B. Masior. 1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; Handbook 2: The Affective Domain. New York: David Mckay.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.-S. 2011. “Fostering Creativity through Education – a Conceptual Framework of Creative Pedagogy.” Creative Education 2 (3): 149–155. doi:10.4236/ce.2011.23021.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, L. 2017. “The Power of the Paradigm: Methods and Paradigms in Education Research.” In Methods and Paradigms in Education Research, edited by L. Ling and P. Ling, 19–41. Hershey PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Lisbon Council. 2007. Skills for the Future. Brussels: Lisbon Council. www.lisboncouncil.net/component/downloads/?id=214.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, B., G. Claxton, and E. Spencer. 2012. “Progression in Creativity: Developing New Forms of Assessment.” In Background Paper for the OECD Conference “Educating for Innovative Societies”. https://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/50153675.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Hubermnan, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Minichiello, V., R. Aroni, and T. Hays. 2008. In-Depth Interviewing: Principles, Techniques, Analysis. 3rd ed. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education. 1999. All Our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education. London: DfEE.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, D. P. 2013. “Moods, Emotions and Creative Thinking: A Framework for Teaching.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 8: 34–44. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2016. “Framework for 21st Century Learning.” Accessed 23 January. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_framework_0816.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. 2015. Creative Schools. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. 2009. “Creativity and Innovation through Lifelong Learning.” Journal of Lifelong Learning in Europe 14 (1): 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J. 2008. “From Learning to Creative Learning: Concepts and Traditions.” In Creative Learning, edited by J. Sefton-Green, 15–26. London: Creative Partnerships.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, S., S. Tishman, E. Winner, L. Hetland, and P. Palmer. 2009. The Qualities of Quality: Understanding Excellence in Arts Education. Cambridge. Mass: Project Zero, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Selkrig, M., and C. Bottrell. 2016. “Considering a Methodology to Provoke Respectful Conversations about Creativity with Arts Educators.” Australian Art Education 37 (1): 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., and D. M. Mackie. 1995. Social Psychology. New York: Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Suto, I. 2013. “21st Century Skills: Ancient, Ubiquitous, Enigmatic?” Research Matters 15 (January): 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., C. Hall, K. Jones, and J. Sefton-Green. 2012. “The Signature Pedagogies Project: Final Report.” CCE. http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/Signature_Pedagogies_Final_Report_April_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tiller, C., and S. Clifford. 2011. “Artists in Creative Education. Unlocking Children’s Creativity: A Practical Guide for Artists.” Creativity Culture and Education: England, KulturKontakt: Austria, Cultuur-Ondernemen: The Netherlands, Drömmarnas Hus: Sweden. http://www.inroads.org.uk/assets/aice-practical-guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2016. “Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action Towards Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Lifelong Learning for All.” UNESCO, Accessed 2 July. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002456/245656E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2017. “Road Map for Arts Education: Building Creative Capacities for the 21st Century.” UNESCO. Accessed 7 January. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/CLT/pdf/Arts_Edu_RoadMap_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. 2016. “Doublethink: The Creativity-Testing Conflict.” Education Week. Accessed 12 June 2016. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/07/18/36zhao_ep.h31.html
   Google Scholar