Questions of autonomy in English teachers’ discursive practices

References

• Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2009. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Apelgren, B. M. 2001. Foreign Language Teachers’ Voices: Personal Theories and Experiences of Change in Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Sweden. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. 1992. “The Text and Cultural Politics.” Educational Researcher 21 (7): 4–19. doi:10.3102/0013189X021007004.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, K. 2004. “Læreboken I Reformtider—Et Verktøy for Endring?” [The Textbook—A Tool for Change?]. In Det Ustyrlige Klasserommet: Om Styring, Samarbeid Og Læringsmiljø I Grunnskolen [The Unruly Classroom: Steering, Collaboration and Learning Environment in the Primary and Lower Secondary School], edited by G. Imsen, 119–143. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Bakken, A. S. 2017a. “Notions of EFL Reading in Norwegian Curricula, 1939–2013.” Acta Didactica Norge 11 (2): 1. doi:10.5617/adno.4474.
   Google Scholar
• Bakken, A. S., and R. E. Lund. 2017b. “Why Should Learners of English Read? Norwegian English Teachers’ Notions of EFL Reading.” Teaching and Teacher Education 70: 78–87. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, S. 2015. Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S., and S. M. S. Orafi. 2009. “Intentions and Realities in Implementing Communicative Reform.” System 37: 243–253. doi:10.1016/j.system.2008.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. 1992. “Induction, a Research Perspective on the Professional Growth of the Newly Qualified Teacher.” In The Induction of Newly Appointed Teachers, edited by Calderhead and J. Lambert, 5–21. London: General Teaching for England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I., and K. Klette. 2008. “Reconstructions of Nordic Teachers; Reform Policies and Teachers’ Work during the 1990s.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 52: 117–133. doi:10.1080/00313830801915754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cribb, A., and S. Gewirtz. 2007. “Unpacking Autonomy and Control in Education: Some Conceptual and Normative Groundwork for a Comparative Analysis.” European Educational Research Journal 6 (3): 203–213. doi:10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.203.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, I., R. Oostdam, and H. Van Toorenburg. 2007. “Teachers’ Experiences and Perceptions of Primary EFL in Norway and the Netherlands: A Comparative Study.” European Journal of Teacher Education 30 (3): 23. doi:10.1080/02619760701486159.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsund, A., and G. O. Hellekjær. 2009. “Defining Washback: An Overview of the Field.” Språk og Språkundervisning 2: 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Engelsen, B. U. 2015. Skolefag I Læreplanreformer [School Subjects in Curriculum Reforms]. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Englund, T. 1997. ”Undervisning Som Meningserbjudande“ [Teaching as Provider of Meaning]. In Didaktik: Teori, Reflektion Og Praktik [Didactics: Theory, Reflection and Practice], edited by M. Uljens, 120–145. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C. 2008. Novice Language Teachers: Insights and Perspectives for the First Year. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D. 1996. “Renaming Experience/Reconstructing Practice: Developing New Understanding of Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 9 (5–6): 485–497. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(93)90032-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. 2014. “Context, Curriculum and Professional Knowledge.” History of Education 43 (6): 768–776. doi:10.1080/0046760X.2014.943813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 2000. “Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning.” Teachers and Teaching 6 (2): 151–182. doi:10.1080/713698714.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., and M. Fullan. 2012. Professional Capital. Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helgøy, I., and A. Homme. 2007. “Towards A New Professionalism in School? A Comparative Study of Teacher Autonomy in Norway and Sweden.” European Educational Research Journal 6 (3): 232–249. doi:10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.232.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansen, H. 2017. “Knowledge Relations and Epistemic Infrastructures as Mediators of Teachers’ Collective Autonomy.” Teaching and Teacher Education 65: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, J., Rönning, W, Skogvold, AS, and Tomlinson P. 2010. På vei fra læreplan til klasserom. Om læreres fortolkning, planlegging og syn på LK06 [From Curriculum to Classroom. Teachers’ Interpretations, Planning and Perceptions of the National Curriculum (LK06)]. Bodø, Norway: Nordland Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. 2007. “Restrained Teaching: The Common Core of Didaktik.” European Educational Research Journal 6 (2): 109–124. doi:10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.109.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, S., and F. Maier. 2009. “Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis and Dispositive Analysis.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 34–61. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D. 2004. The Power of Reading: Insights from the Research. 2nd ed. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkmann. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. 2013. “The Complexity of Language Teachers’ Beliefs and Practice: One EFL Teacher’s Theories.” The Language Learning Journal 41 (2): 175–191. doi:10.1080/09571736.2013.790132.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. 1990. “The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers’ Professional Relations.” Teachers College Record 91 (4): 509–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundquist, L. 1987. Implementation Steering. An Actor-Structure Approach. Lund: Studentliterature, Chartwell-Bratt.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S. 2013a. “Accountable for What and to Whom? Changing Representations and New Legitimation Discourses among Teachers under Increased External Control.” Journal of Educational Change 14 (4): 423–444. doi:10.1007/s10833-013-9212-y.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S. 2013b. “Talking about the Test. Boundary Work in Primary School Teachers’ Interactions around National Testing of Student Performance.” Teaching and Teacher Education 36: 132–142. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., and C. E. Mølstad. 2014. “Licence to Teach? Læreplananalyse Og Profesjonsutvikling” [Licence to Teach? Curriculum Analysis and Professional Development]. In Profesjonsutvikling i skolen [Professional Development in Schools], edited by E. Elstad and K. Helstad, 152–169. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., and C. E. Mølstad. 2015. “Shifts in Curriculum Control: Contesting Ideas of Teacher Autonomy.” Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 1 (2): 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, I. 2006. “Teachers’ and Learners’ Images for Coursebooks.” ELT Journal 60 (2): 171–180. doi:10.1093/elt/cci104.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. 2008–2009. “Læreren. Rollen Og Utdanningen” [The Teacher. The Role and the Education]. Report to the Storting no 11.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Research. 2013. “The English Subject Curriculum (Revised).” In The National Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion in Primary and Secondary Education and Training (LK06), Oslo: Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. http://www.udir.no/kl06/eng1-03/Hele/?lplang=eng&read=1
   Google Scholar
• Mølstad, C. E., and B. Karseth. 2016. “National Curricula in Norway and Finland: The Role of Learning Outcomes.” European Educational Research Journal 15 (3): 329–344. doi:10.1177/1474904116639311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. 1995. Understanding Curriculum: An Introduction to the Study of Historical and Contemporary Curriculum Discourses. Vol. 17. New York: P. Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., and M. Pennington. 1998. “The First Year of Teaching.” In Beyond Training, edited by J. C. Richards, 173–190. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schug, M. C., R. D. Western, and L. G. Enochs. 1997. “Why Do Social Studies Teachers Use Textbooks? The Answer May Lie in Economic Theory.” Social Education 61 (2): 97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Sosniak, L. A., and S. S. Stodolsky. 1993. “Teachers and Textbooks: Materials Use in Four Fourth-Grade Classrooms.” Elementary School Journal 93 (3): 249–275. doi:10.1086/461725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, P., F. E. Tonnessen, and C. Kyriacou. 2004. “Teacher “Training” and Teacher “Education” in England and Norway: A Comparative Study of Policy Goals.” Comparative Education 40 (1): 109–130. doi:10.1080/0305006042000184908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuvland, R. A. C. 2016. Approaches to English as a Foreign Language (EFL): Reading Instructions in Norwegian Primary Schools. Stavanger: University of Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, A.-C. J. 2000. Nya Redskap För Lärande: Studier Av Lärares Val Och Användning Av Läromedel I Gymnasieskolan [New Tools for Learning: Studies of Teachers’ Choice and Use of Learning Material in Upper Secondary Teaching]. Stockholm: HLS förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Svingby, G. 1985. Sätt Kunskapen I Centrum! [Place Knowledge in the Center!]. 85: 1. Stockholm: Utbildningsförlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Telhaug, A. O., O. A. Mediås, and P. Aasen. 2006. “The Nordic Model in Education: Education as Part of the Political System in the Last 50 Years.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 50 (3): 245–283. doi:10.1080/00313830600743274.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, A. H., and C. J. Weir. 2014. Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Urzua, A. 1999. “The Socialization Process of Beginning Teachers.” Journal of Teacher Education 50: 231–233. doi:10.1177/002248719905000309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, T. 2005. Classroom Management in Language Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar