Reflections on conducting rapid reviews of educational research

References

• Alexander, P. A. 2020. “Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews.” Review of Educational Research 90 (1): 6–23. doi:10.3102/0034654319854352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and W. Harlen. 2006. “Issues in Synthesizing Research in Education.” Educational Research 48 (3): 287–299. doi:10.1080/00131880600992330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aromataris, E., R. Fernandez, C. M. Godfrey, C. Holly, H. Khalil, and P. Tungpunkom. 2015. ”Summarizing Systematic Reviews: Methodological Development, Conduct and Reporting of an Umbrella Review Approach.” JBI Evidence Implementation 133: 132–140. doi;10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Productivity Commission. 2016. National Education Evidence Base: Productivity Commission Inquiry Report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/education-evidence/report/education-evidence.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2007. “Why ‘What Works’ Won’t Work: Evidence‐based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research.” Educational Theory 57 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association. 2014. Research and the Teaching Profession: Building the Capacity for a Self-Improving Education System. Final Report of the BERA-RSA Inquiry into the Role of Research in Teacher Education. London: BERA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/BERA-RSA-Research-Teaching-Profession-FULL-REPORT-for-web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., and J. Malin, edited by. 2022. The Emerald Handbook of Evidence-Informed Practice in Education. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Cirkony, C., M. Rickinson, L. Walsh, J. Gleeson, M. Salisbury, B. Cutler, M. Berry, and K. Smith. 2021. ”Beyond Effective Approaches: A Rapid Review Response to Designing Professional Learning.” Professional Development in Education Advance online publication doi:10.1080/19415257.2021.1973075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, A., D. Smith, and A. Booth. 2012. “Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.” Qualitative Health Research 22 (10): 1435–1443. doi:10.1177/1049732312452938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., and A. C. Koenka. 2012. “The Overview of Reviews: Unique Challenges and Opportunities When Research Syntheses are the Principal Elements of New Integrative Scholarship.” The American Psychologist 67 (6): 446–462. doi:10.1037/a0027119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., S. Agarwal, D. Jones, B. Young, and A. Sutton. 2005. “Synthesising Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence: A Review of Possible Methods.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 10 (1): 45–53. doi:10.1177/135581960501000110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Education Endowment Foundation. 2020a. Remote Learning, Rapid Evidence Assessment. London: Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Remote_Learning_Rapid_Evidence_Assessment.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Education Endowment Foundation. 2020b. Remote Professional Development, Rapid Evidence Assessment. London: Education Endowment Foundation. https://d2tic4wvo1iusb.cloudfront.net/documents/guidance/Remote_PD_Evidence_Assessment.pdf?v=1629099920.
   Google Scholar
• Ganann, R., D. Ciliska, and H. Thomas. 2010. “Expediting Systematic Reviews: Methods and Implications of Rapid Reviews.” Implementation Science 5 (1): 56. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garritty, C., G. Gartlehner, C. Kamel, V. J. King, B. Nussbaumer-Streit, A. Stevens, C. Hamel, and L. Affengruber. 2020. Cochrane Rapid Reviews: Interim Guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. London: Cochrane. https://methods.cochrane.org/rapidreviews/sites/methods.cochrane.org.rapidreviews/files/public/uploads/cochrane_rr_-_guidance-23mar2020-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Garritty, C., G. Gartlehner, B. Nussbaumer-Streit, V. J. King, C. Hamel, C. Kamel, L. Affengruber, and A. Stevens. 2021. “Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group Offers Evidence-Informed Guidance to Conduct Rapid Reviews.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, no. 130: 13–22. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, D. 2007. “Weight of Evidence: A Framework for the Appraisal of the Quality and Relevance of Evidence.” Research Papers in Education 22 (2): 213–228. doi:10.1080/02671520701296189.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., S. Oliver, and J. Thomas, edited by. 2017. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., S. Oliver, and J. Thomas. 2019. “Systematic Reviews.” In SAGE Research Methods Foundations, edited by P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, and R. A. Williams, 1–20. London: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781526421036857078.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, D., and J. Thomas. 2016. “Systematic Reviews of Research in Education: Aims, Myths and Multiple Methods.” Review of Education 4 (1): 84–102. doi:10.1002/rev3.3068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., and R. Peacock. 2005. “Effectiveness and Efficiency of Search Methods in Systematic Reviews of Complex Evidence: Audit of Primary Sources.” The BMJ 331 (331): 1064. doi:10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamel, C., A. Michaud, M. Thaku, B. Skidmore, A. Stevens, B. Nussbaumer-Streit, and C. Garritty. 2021. “Defining Rapid Reviews: A Systematic Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis of Definitions and Defining Characteristics of Rapid Reviews.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 129: 74–85. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 2020. “Reflections on the Methodological Approach of Systematic Reviews.” In Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application, edited by O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, and K. Buntins, 23–39. Wiedbaden: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, J., and J. Kleijnen. 2012. “What is a Rapid Review? A Methodological Exploration of Rapid Reviews in Health Technology Assessments.” International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 10 (4): 397–410. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00290.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hattie, J., H. J. Rogers, and H. Swaminathan. 2014. “The Role of Meta-Analysis in Educational Research.” In A Companion to Research in Education, edited by A. D. Reid, E. P. Hart, and M. A. Peters, 197–207. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. 2016. “How Does Professional Development Improve Teaching?” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 945–980. doi:10.3102/0034654315626800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khangura, S., K. Konnyu, R. Cushman, J. Grimshaw, and D. Moher. 2012. “Evidence Summaries: The Evolution of a Rapid Review Approach.” Systematic Reviews, no. 1: 10. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malin, J. R., C. Brown, G. Ion, I. van Ackeren, N. Bremm, R. Luzmore, J. Flood, and G. M. Rind. 2020. “World-Wide Barriers and Enablers to Achieving Evidence-Informed Practice in Education: What Can Be Learnt from Spain, England, the United States, and Germany?” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7 (1): 99. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00587-8.
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, K., and J. M. Aldridge. 2019. “What Gets in the Way? A New Conceptual Model for the Trajectory from Teacher Professional Development to Impact.” Professional Development in Education 47 (5): 834–852. doi:10.1080/19415257.2019.1667412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M., and D. Gough. 2020. “Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application.” In Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application, edited by O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, and K. Buntins, 3–22. Wiedbaden: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D., and D. Pedder. 2011. “Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning.” Review of Educational Research 81 (3): 376–407. doi:10.3102/0034654311413609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2007. Evidence in Education: Linking Research and Policy. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264033672-en.
   Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., and H. Roberts. 2003. ““Evidence, Hierarchies, and Typologies: Horses for Courses.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 57 (7): 527–529. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.7.527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanin, J. R., B. R. Maynard, and N. A. Dell. 2017. “Overviews in Education Research: A Systematic Review and Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 87 (1): 172–203. doi:10.3102/0034654316631117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, M., R. M. Fernandes, L. A. Becker, D. Pieper, and L. Hartling. 2020. ”Chapter V: Overviews of Reviews.” In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.0, edited by J. P. T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, and V. A. Welch, https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-v
   Google Scholar
• Popay, J., H. Roberts, A. Sowden, M. Petticrew, L. Arai, M. Rodgers, and N. Britten. 2006. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Bailrigg: Lancaster University. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancasteruniversity/contentassets/documents/fhm/dhr/chir/NSsynthesisguidanceVersion1-April2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., C. Cirkony, L. Walsh, J. Gleeson, and M. Salisbury. 2020. Towards Quality Use of Research Evidence in Education: Discussion Paper. Melbourne: Monash University. doi:10.26180/14071571.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., C. Cirkony, L. Walsh, J. Gleeson, M. Salisbury, and A. Boaz. 2021. “Insights from a Cross-Sector Review on How to Conceptualise the Quality of Use of Research Evidence.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8 (1): 141. doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00821-x.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., and H. May. 2009. A Comparative Study of Methodological Approaches to Reviewing Literature. York: The Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Comparativestudy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, M., J. McGowan, E. Cogo, J. Grimshaw, D. Moher, and C. Lefebvre. 2009. “An Evidence-Based Practice Guideline for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62 (9): 944–952. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, H. 2020. “Ethical Considerations of Conducting Systematic Reviews in Educational Research.” In Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application, edited by O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, and K. Buntins, 41–54. Wiedbaden: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., A. Wilson, H. Barrar, and I. Fung. 2007. Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education. https://thehub.swa.govt.nz/assets/documents/42432_TPLandDBESentireWeb_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. 2004. “Systematic Reviewing–the ‘Call Centre’ Version of Research Synthesis. Time for a More Flexible Approach.” Paper presented at the Education and Social Research Council/Research Capacity Building Network Seminar on Systematic Reviewing, University of Sheffield, UK. June 24.
   Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., J. Antony, W. Zarin, L. Strifler, M. Ghassemi, J. Ivory, L. Perrier, B. Hutton, D. Moher, and S. E. Straus. 2015. “A Scoping Review of Rapid Review Methods.” BMC Medicine 13 (1): 224. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, A., A. Cameron, L. Sturm, T. Lathlean, W. Babidge, S. Blamey, K. Facey, D. Hailey, I. Norderhaug, and G. Maddern. 2008. “Rapid versus Full Systematic Reviews: Validity in Clinical Practice?” ANZ Journal of Surgery 78 (11): 1037–1040. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04730.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. 2014. Procedures Handbook (Version 4.1). Washington: Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/WWC-Standards-Handbook-v4-1-508.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. 2020. “The Global Evidence Architecture in Health and Education: A Comparative Scorecard.” In Getting Evidence into Education: Evaluating the Routes to Policy and Practice, edited by S. Gorard, 20–33. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., B. Down, M. Mills, S. Shore, and A. Woods. 2021. “Strengthening a Research-Rich Teaching Profession: An Australian Study.” Teaching Education 32 (3): 338–352. doi:10.1080/10476210.2020.1737666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolgemuth, J. R., T. Hicks, and V. Agosto. 2017. “Unpacking Assumptions in Research Synthesis: A Critical Construct Synthesis Approach.” Educational Researcher 46 (3): 131–139. doi:10.3102/0013189X17703946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., T. Duncan, S. W. Lee, B. Scarloss, and K. L. Shapley. 2007. Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement. Washington: U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/rel_2007033.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, and K. Buntins. 2020. ”Introduction: Systematic Reviews in Educational Research.” In Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application, edited by O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, and K. Buntins. Wiedbaden: Springer. vxiv. doi: .10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1.
   Google Scholar