Making it clear: a review of language issues in testing with special reference to the National Curriculum mathematics tests at key stage 2

References

• CARRELL , P. L. 1987 . ‘Readability in ESL’ . Reading in a Foreign Language , 4 : 21 – 40 .
   Google Scholar
• CARROLL , J. B. 1971 . Learning from Verbal Discourse in Educational Media: A Review of the Literature , Trenton, NJ : Educational Testing Service (USOE) .
   Google Scholar
• CHAMBERS , F. 1983 . ‘Readability formulae and the structure of text’ . Educational Review , 35 : 3 – 13 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLOSE , G. , FURLONG , T. and SIMON , S. 1997 . The Validity of the 1996 Key Stage 2 Tests in English, Mathematics and Science , London : Association of Teachers and Lecturers .
   Google Scholar
• COKE , E. U. and ROTHKOPF , E. Z. 1970 . ‘Note on a simple algorithm for a computer‐produced reading ease score’ . Journal of Applied Psychology , 54 : 208 – 10 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DALE , E. and CHALL , J. S. 1948 . ‘Formula for predicting readability’ . Educational Research Bulletin , 27 ( 11‐20 ) : 37 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• DANIELS , S. 1995 . ‘Can pre‐school education affect children's achievement in primary school?’ . Oxford Review of Education , 21 : 163 – 78 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAWE , L. 1983 . ‘Bilingualism and mathematical reasoning in English as a second language’ . Educational Studies in Mathematics , 14 : 325 – 53 .
   Google Scholar
• DONALDSON , M. C. 1987 . Children's Minds , London : Fontana Press .
   Google Scholar
• EBEL , R. L. 1991 . Essentials of Educational Measurement , Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice‐Hall .
   Google Scholar
• FATT , J. P. T. 1991 . ‘Text‐related variables in textbook readability’ . Research Papers in Education , 6 : 225 – 45 .
   Google Scholar
• FILIPPATOU , D. and PUMFREY , P. D. 1996 . ‘Pictures, titles, reading accuracy and reading comprehension: a research review (1937‐95)’ . Educational Research , 38 : 259 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FLESCH , R. F. 1948 . ‘A new readability yardstick’ . Journal of Applied Psychology , 32 : 221 – 33 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FREEDLE , R. and KOSTIN , I. 1990 . ‘Item difficulty of four verbal item types and an index of differential item functioning for black and white examinees’ . Journal of Educational Measurement , 27 : 329 – 43 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GIBBS , W. and ORTON , J. 1994 . “ ‘Language and mathematics.’ ” . In Issues in Teaching Mathematics , Edited by: ORTON , A. and WAIN , G. London : Cassell .
   Google Scholar
• GOLDSTEIN , H. and LEWIS , T. 1996 . “ ‘The scope of assessment.’ ” . In Assessment: Problems, Developments and Statistical Issues , Edited by: GOLDSTEIN , H. and LEWIS , T. Chichester : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• GREENE , J. and COULSON , M. 1995 . Language Understanding: Current Issues , Buckingham : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• GUNNING , R. 1952 . The Technique of Clear Writing , New York : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• HARRISON , C. 1980 . Readability in the Classroom , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• HATER , M. A. 1969 . The cloze procedure as a measure of reading comprehensibility and difficulty in mathematical English , Purdue University . PhD thesis
   Google Scholar
• HOMAN , S. , HEWITT , M. and LINDER , J. 1994 . ‘The development and validation of a formula for measuring single‐sentence test item readability’ . Journal of Educational Measurement , 31 : 349 – 58 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KANE , R. B. , BYRNE , M. A. and HATER , M. A. 1974 . Helping Children Read Mathematics , New York : American Book Company .
   Google Scholar
• KLARE , G. R. 1975 . ‘Assessing readability’ . Reading Research Quarterly , 10 : 62 – 102 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LIGHT , P. 1979 . The Development of Social Sensitivity , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• McLAUGHLIN , G. 1969 . ‘SMOG grading ‐ a new readability formula’ . Journal of Reading , 22 : 639 – 46 .
   Google Scholar
• MOBLEY , M. 1986 . Evaluating Curriculum Materials: Unit 2, Readability , London : Schools Council/Longman .
   Google Scholar
• NEWTON , D. P. 1984 . ‘Science textbooks and readability measures ‐ a caveat’ . School Science Review , 66 : 368 – 71 .
   Google Scholar
• NITKO , A. J. 1996 . Educational Assessment of Students , Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice‐Hall .
   Google Scholar
• NOONAN , J. 1990 . ‘Readability problems presented by mathematics text’ . Early Child Development and Care , 54 : 57 – 81 .
   Google Scholar
• NUTTALL , D. L. 1991 . “ ‘Assessment in England: Report prepared for Pelavin Associates.’ ” . In Effective Assessment and the Improvement of Education: A Tribute to Desmond Nuttall , Edited by: MURPHY , R. and BROADFOOT , P. London : Falmer Press .
   Google Scholar
• OAKHILL , J. and GARNHAM , A. 1992 . “ ‘Discourse Representation and Text Processing’ ” . In Special edition of Language and Cognitive Processes , Hove : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• QUALIFICATIONS AND CURRICULUM AUTHORITY . 1998 . Assessment and Reporting Arrangements: Key Stage 2 , London : QCA .
   Google Scholar
• SCHMITT , A. P. 1988 . ‘Language and cultural characteristics that explain differential item functioning for Hispanic examinees’ . Journal of Educational Measurement , 25 : 1 – 13 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHORROCKS‐TAYLOR , D. 1998 . “ ‘Cross purposes: development and change in National Curriculum assessment in England and Wales.’ ” . In Directions in Educational Psychology , Edited by: SHORROCKS‐TAYLOR , D. London : Whurr .
   Google Scholar
• SHORROCKS‐TAYLOR , D. , BECK , N. , POOL , P. , HILDITCH , C. and DANBY , P. 1996 . The Language of the Mathematics Tests at Key Stage 2 , Confidential Report presented to the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority London : SCAA .
   Google Scholar
• SHORROCKS , D. , DANIELS , S. , FROBISHER , L. , NELSON , N. , WATERSON , A. and BELL , J. 1992 . The Evaluation of National Curriculum Assessment at Key Stage 1 , London : School Examinations and Assessment Council .
   Google Scholar
• SHUARD , H. and ROTHERY , A. 1984 . Children Reading Mathematics , London : John Murray .
   Google Scholar
• SLATER , B. C. and THOMPSON , J. J. 1984 . ‘How useful are readability formulae?’ . Education in Chemistry , 21 : 92 – 4 .
   Google Scholar
• SPACHE , G. D. 1953 . ‘A new readability formula for primary grade reading materials’ . Elementary School Journal , 53 : 410 – 13 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• THRELFALL , J. , CURRY , J. , SWINNERTON , B. and NELSON , N. 1997 . An Evaluation of Pupil Performance on the National Tests in Mathematics at Key Stage 2: 1997 Unpublished Confidential Report to Qualifications and Curriculum Authority
   Google Scholar