Provision for mathematically able children in primary schools: a review of practice five years after England dropped the gifted and talented initiative

References

• Ambrose, Don, Joyce VanTassel-Baska, Laurence J. Coleman, and Tracy L. Cross. 2010. “Unified, Insular, Firmly Policed, or Fractured, Porous, Contested, Gifted Education?” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 33 (4): 453–478.10.1177/016235321003300402
   Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. G., and M. Foley Nicpon. 2007. “Twice-Exceptional Learners: Implications for the Classroom.” Teaching for High Potential, Spring: 9-13.
   Google Scholar
• Borland, James H. 1996. “Gifted Education and the Threat of Irrelevance.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 19 (2): 129–147.10.1177/016235329601900202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borland, James H. 2013. “Problematizing Gifted Education.” In Fundamentals of Gifted Education: Considering Multiple Perspectives, edited by Carolyn M. Callahan and Holly L. Hertberg-Davis, 69–80. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyes, Louise Comerford. 2004. Accelerated Learning: A Literature Survey. Bradford: Unit for Educational Research & Evaluation, University of Bradford.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Maggie, and Valsa Koshy. 2014. “Reflections on the Implementation of the Gifted and Talented Policy in England, 1999–2011.” Gifted Education International 30 (3): 254–262.10.1177/0261429413486862
   Google Scholar
• Casey, Ronald. 1999. “A Key Concepts Model for Teaching and Learning Mathematics.” Mathematics in School 28 (3): 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, Ronald. 2002. “A Framework for Teaching Mathematically Promising Pupils.” In Unlocking Numeracy: A Guide for Primary Schools, edited by Valsa Koshy and Jean Murray, 122–145. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, Ronald, and Valsa Koshy. 2013. “Gifted and Talented Education: The English Policy Highway at a Crossroads?” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 36 (1): 44–65.10.1177/0162353212469745
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Mary Ruth, James J. Gallagher, and Jennifer Job. 2012. “Developing and Sustaining Professionalism within Gifted Education.” Gifted Child Today 35 (1): 27–36.10.1177/1076217511427511
   Google Scholar
• Cox, June, Neil Daniel, and Bruce O. Boston. 1985. Educating Able Learners: Programs and Promising Practices. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools and Families. 2008a. Effective Provision for Gifted and Talented Children in Primary Education. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Children, Schools and Families. 2008b. Identifying Gifted and Talented Learners: Getting Started. Annesley: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2014. The National Curriculum in England: Framework Document. July. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2016. Educational Excellence Everywhere. Cm 9230. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, Christos. 2012. “Provision for Mathematically Gifted Children in Primary Schools: An Investigation of Four Different Methods of Organisational Provision.” Educational Review 64 (2): 241–260.10.1080/00131911.2011.598920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, Christos. 2013. Developing Mathematical Giftedness within Primary Schools: A Study of Strategies for Educating Children Who Are Gifted in Mathematics. Saarbrücken: LAP, Lambert Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, Christos. 2016. “Gifted Programs Cannot Be Successful without Gifted Research and Theory: Evidence from Practice with Gifted Students of Mathematics.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 39 (3): 221–236.10.1177/0162353216657185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, L. 2010. “G&T Policy ‘Inconsistent’.” G&T Update 72 (March): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, D. 2001. “An Effective Primary School for the Gifted and Talented.” In Curriculum Provision for the Gifted and Talented in the Primary School: English, Maths, Science and ICT, edited by D. Eyre and L. McClure, 1–27. London: NACE/David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Foley-Nicpon, Megan, Susan G. Assouline, and Nicholas Colangelo. 2013. “Twice-Exceptional Learners: Who Needs to Know What?” Gifted Child Quarterly 57 (3): 169–180.10.1177/0016986213490021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. 2003. “Equity and Excellence: Culturally Diverse Students in Gifted Education.” In Handbook of Gifted Education, edited by Nicholas Colangelo and Gary A. Davis. 3rd ed., 506–520. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Joan, Johanna Raffan, and Ian Warwick. 2010. Worldwide Provision to Develop Gifts and Talents: An International Survey. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, F. 1998. “A Proposal for Subcategories within Gifted or Talented Populations.” Gifted Child Quarterly. 42 (2): 87–95.10.1177/001698629804200203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagne, F. 2008. Building Gifts into Talents: Brief Overview of the DMGT 2.0. Montréal, QC: Gagne.
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, F. 2011. “Academic Talent Development and the Equity Issue in Gifted Education.” Talent Development and Excellence 3 (1): 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, James J. 1975. “How the Government Breaks Its Promises.” New York University Quarterly 6 (4): 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, James J. 2015. “Political Issues in Gifted Education.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 38 (1): 77–89.10.1177/0162353214565546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, Howard. 1983. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Howard. 1999. Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, Howard. 2006. Multiple Intelligences : New Horizons in Theory in Practice. Revised and updated ed. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, Graham, and David Hughes. 1995. Research and the Teacher: A Qualitative Introduction to School-Based Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons. 2010. The Gifted and Talented Programme: Oral and Written Evidence (edited by Children, School and Families Select Committee). February 1, 2010. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Just, Marcel Adam, and Sashank Varma. 2007. “The Organization of Thinking: What Functional Brain Imaging Reveals about the Neuroarchitecture of Complex Cognition.” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 7 (3): 153–191.10.3758/CABN.7.3.153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karolyi, C., V. Ramos-Ford, and H. Gardner. 2003. “Multiple Intelligences: A Perspective on Giftedness.” In Handbook of Gifted Education, edited by N. Colangelo and G. A. Davis. 3rd ed., 100–112. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kell, Harrison J., David Lubinski, and Camilla P. Benbow. 2013. “Who Rises to the Top? Early Indicators.” Psychological Science 24 (5): 648–659.10.1177/0956797612457784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshy, Valsa. 2001. Teaching Mathematics to Able Children. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Koshy, Valsa, and Catrin Pinheiro-Torres. 2013. “'Are We Being De-Gifted, Miss?’ Primary School Gifted and Talented Co-Ordinators’ Responses to the Gifted and Talented Education Policy in England.” British Educational Research Journal 39 (6): 953–978.10.1002/berj.3021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshy, Valsa, Paul Ernest, and Ron Casey. 2009. “Mathematically Gifted and Talented Learners: Theory and Practice.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 40 (2): 213–228.10.1080/00207390802566907
   Google Scholar
• Koshy, Valsa, Catrin Pinheiro-Torres, and Carole Portman-Smith. 2012. “The Landscape of Gifted and Talented Education in England and Wales: How Are Teachers Implementing Policy?” Research Papers in Education 27 (2): 167–186.10.1080/02671522.2010.509514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutetskii, Vadim Andreevich. 1976. The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren; Translated from the Russian by Joan Teller; Edited by Jeremy Kilpatrick and Izaak Wirszup. Survey of Recent East European Mathematical Literature. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski, David, and Camilla Persson Benbow. 2000. “States of Excellence.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 137–150.10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, David, and Camilla Persson Benbow. 2006. “Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth after 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (4): 316–345.10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, David, Rose Mary Webb, Martha J. Morelock, and Camilla P. Benbow. 2001. “Top 1 in 10,000: A 10- Year Follow- up of the Profoundly Gifted.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (4): 718–729.10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, David, Camilla P. Benbow, and Harrison J. Kell. 2014. “Life Paths and Accomplishments of Mathematically Precocious Males and Females Four Decades Later.” Psychological Science 25 (12): 2217–2232.10.1177/0956797614551371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Muratori, Michelle C., Julian C. Stanley, Lenhard Ng, Jack Ng, Miraca U. M. Gross, Terence Tao, and Billy Tao. 2006. “Insights from SMPY’s Greatest Former Child Prodigies: Drs. Terence (“Terry”) Tao and Lenhard (“Lenny”) Ng Reflect on Their Talent Development.” Gifted Child Quarterly 50 (4): 307–324.10.1177/001698620605000404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics. 2014. Mastery Approaches to Mathematics and the New National Curriculum. Sheffield: National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted). 2009. Gifted and Talented Pupils in Schools. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted). 2013. Annual Report 2012/13: South West Regional Report. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted). 2014. The Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills 2013/14: South West Regional Report. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted). 2015a. The Most Able Students: An Update on Progress since June 2013. No. 150034. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted). 2015b. School Inspection Handbook: Handbook for Inspecting Schools in England under Section 5 of the Education Act 2005 (as Amended by the Education Act 2011). No. 120101. London: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, Steven I., and Tania Jarosewich. 2007. “The Gifted Rating Scales-School Form: An Analysis of the Standardization Sample Based on Age, Gender, Race, and Diagnostic Efficiency.” Gifted Child Quarterly 51 (1): 39–50.10.1177/0016986206296658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, Jonathan A., and Carolyn M. Callahan. 2014. “Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education: Status of the Field and Considerations for the Future.” Exceptional Children 80 (4): 390–406.10.1177/0014402914527244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, Sally M., Susan M. Baum, and Edith Burke. 2014. “An Operational Definition of Twice-Exceptional Learners.” Gifted Child Quarterly 58 (3): 217–230.10.1177/0016986214534976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, Joseph S. 1999. “What is This Thing Called Giftedness, and How Do We Develop It? A Twenty-Five Year Perspective.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 23 (1): 3–54.10.1177/016235329902300102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, Joseph S. 2012. “Reexamining the Role of Gifted Education and Talent Development for the 21st Century: A Four-Part Theoretical Approach.” Gifted Child Quarterly 56 (3): 150–159.10.1177/0016986212444901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, Joseph S., L. H. Smith, A. J. White, C. M. Callahan, R. K. Hartman, K. W. Westberg, and R. E. Systma Reed. 2010. Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students [Published Instrument]. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryser, G. R., and K. McConnell. 2004. SIGS Scales for Identifying Gifted Students. Waco, TX: Prufrock.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. 1992. “Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition and Sense-Making in Mathematics.” In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by D. A. Grouws, 165–197. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield, Linda Jensen. 1999. “Serving the Needs of the Mathematically Promising.” In Developing Mathematically Promising Students, edited by L. J. Sheffield, 43–55. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield, Linda Jensen. 2003. Extending the Challenge in Mathematics : Developing Mathematical Promise in K-8 Students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented; Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smithers, A., P. Robinson, Centre for Education and Employment Research, and University of Buckingham. 2012. Educating the Highly Able. London: The Sutton Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Speirs Neumeister, Kristie. 2007. “Perfectionism in Gifted Students: An Overview of Current Research.” Gifted Education International 23 (3): 254–263.10.1177/026142940702300306
   Google Scholar
• Sriraman, Bharath. 2003. “Mathematical Giftedness, Problem Solving, and the Ability to Formulate Generalizations: The Problem-Solving Experiences of Four Gifted Students.” Journal of Advance Academics 14 (3): 151–165.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. C. 2000. “Helping Students Learn Only What They Don’T Already Know.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6 (1): 216–222.10.1037/1076-8971.6.1.216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Robert J. 2003. “WICS as a Model of Giftedness.” High Ability Studies 14 (2): 109–137.10.1080/1359813032000163807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Robert J. 2010. “WICS: A New Model for School Psychology.” School Psychology International 31 (6): 599–616.10.1177/0143034310386534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Robert J., and Elena L. Grigorenko. 2002. “The Theory of Successful Intelligence as a Basis for Gifted Education.” Gifted Child Quarterly 46 (4): 265–277.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Robert J., Linda Jarvin, and Elena L. Grigorenko. 2011. Explorations in Giftedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, Joyce, Annie Xuemei Feng, and Brandy L. Evans. 2007. “Patterns of Identification and Performance among Gifted Students Identified through Performance Tasks: A Three-Year Analysis.” Gifted Child Quarterly 51 (3): 218–231.10.1177/0016986207302717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westberg, K. L., and M. E. Daoust. 2004. The Results of the Replication of the Classroom Practices Survey Replication in Two States. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented; University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Westberg, K. L., F. X. Archambault, S. M. Dobyns, and T. J. Salvin. 1993. An Observational Study of Instructional and Curricular Practices Used with Gifted and Talented Students in Regular Classrooms. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented; University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Peter, Sir. 2008. Independent Review of Mathematics Teaching in Early Years Settings and Primary Schools. Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar