Self-regulated learning in MOOCs: lessons learned from a literature review

References

• Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C. D., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2017). Understanding learners’ motivation and learning strategies in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 119–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino, A. R. (2007). Self-regulated learning in online education. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 4(6). Available from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jun_07/article01.htm
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson, & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baneres, D., & Saíz, J. (2016). Intelligent tutoring system for learning digital systems on MOOC environments. Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), 2016 10th International Conference on (pp. 95–102). Fukuoka, Japan: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaven, T., Hauck, M., Comas-Quinn, A., Lewis, T., & de Los Arcos, B. (2014). MOOCs: Striking the right balance between facilitation and self-determination. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bernacki, M. L., Aguilar, A. C., & Byrnes, J. P. (2011). Self-regulated learning and technology-enhanced learning environments: An opportunity-propensity analysis. In G. Dettori & D. Persico (Eds.), Fostering self-regulated learning through ICT (pp. 1–26). IRMA.
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self‐regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2000). Self-regulated learning: Finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 417–450). Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2014). Facilitating MOOCs learning through weekly meet-up: A case study in Taiwan. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 183–184). Atlanta, GA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. H., & Chen, P. J. (2015). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Y., Asano, Y., & Yoshikawa, M. (2016). Course content analysis: An initiative step toward learning object recommendation systems for MOOC learners. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 347–352). Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D., Chen, G., Jivet, I., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. J. (2016a). Encouraging metacognition & self-regulation in MOOCs through increased learner feedback. Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2016 Learning Analytics for Learners Workshop (pp. 17–22). Edinburgh, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D., Chen, G., Van der Zee, T., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. J. (2016b). Retrieval practice and study planning in MOOCs: Exploring classroom-based self-regulated learning strategies at scale. European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 57–71). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, S., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2015). Recognising learner autonomy: Lessons and reflections from a joint x/c MOOC. Proceedings of Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia, 2015, 117–119.
   Google Scholar
• Devolder, A., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self‐regulated learning in computer‐based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 557–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., Fox, A., Kirchner, C., Mitchell, J., & Wirsing, M. (2014). Massive Open Online Courses: Current state and perspectives (Dagstuhl Perspectives workshop 14112). Dagstuhl Manifestos (Vol. 4, No. 1). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., Clow, D., Beale, R., Cooper, A. J., Morris, N., Bayne, S., & Woodgate, A. (2015). Moving through MOOCs: Pedagogy, learning design and patterns of engagement. In G. Conole, T. Klobučar, C. Rensing, J. Konert & E. Lavoué (Eds.), Design for teaching and learning in a networked world (pp. 70–84). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 634–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on Massive Open Online Courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 134–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Martínez, J. A., Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Gómez-Sánchez, E., & Cano-Parra, R. (2015). Cloud computing and education: A state-of-the-art survey. Computers & Education, 80, 132–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., & Reinecke, K. (2014a). Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 21–30). Atlanta, GA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hadwin, A. F., Winne, P. H., Stockley, D. B., Nesbit, J. C., & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students’ self-reports about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 477–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, R. (2015). Self-regulated learning, team learning and project performance in entrepreneurship education: Learning in a lean startup environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 100, 21–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howley, I., Tomar, G. S., Ferschke, O., & Rosé, C. P. (2017). Reputation systems impact on help seeking in MOOC discussion forums. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, PP (Issue 99), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Jakešová, J., & Kalenda, J. (2015). Self-regulated learning: Critical-realistic conceptualization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 178–189.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, R. S., Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Kester, L., & Kalz, M. (2017). Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 6–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, Y., Tomar, G., Ferschke, O., Rosé, C. P., & Gašević, D. (2016). Expediting support for social learning with behavior modeling. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 400–405). Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews (Technical Report TR/SE-0401). Keele, UK: Keele University.
   Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., Maldonado, J. J., & Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2016). Recommending self-regulated learning strategies does not improve performance in a MOOC. Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 101–104). Edinburgh, UK: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Owers, J., Scott, A. M., & Woodgate, A. (2016). Profiling MOOC course returners: How does student behavior change between two course enrollments? Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 269–272). Edinburgh, UK: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., & Waard, I. D. (2015). Self-directed learning in trial futurelearn courses. Proceedings of the 3rd European Stakeholder Summit EMOOCS, (pp. 234–243). Mons, Belgium: P.A.U. Education
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 28–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Zue, V. (2015). Linking MOOC courseware to accommodate diverse learner backgrounds. Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education, SLATE 2015 Satellite Event of INTERSPEECH 2015. Leipzig, Germany: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Designing MOOCs for professional learners: Tools and patterns to encourage self-regulated learning. eLearning Papers, 42, 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Loizzo, J., Ertmer, P. A., Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2017). Adult MOOC learners as self-directed: Perceptions of motivation, success, and completion. Online Learning, 21(2), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magno, C. (2010). Assessing academic self-regulated learning among Filipino college students: The factor structure and item fit. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 5, 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado, J. J., Palta, R., Vázquez, J., Bermeo, J. L., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Munoz-Gama, J. (2016). Exploring differences in how learners navigate in MOOCs based on self-regulated learning and learning styles: A process mining approach. Computing Conference (CLEI), 2016 XLII Latin American (pp. 1–12). Valparíso, Chile: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kizilcec, R. F., Morales, N., & Munoz-Gama, J. (2018). Mining theory-based patterns from big data: Identifying self-regulated learning strategies in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 179–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Lopez, R., Perera-Rodríguez, V., Tuovila, I., & Yot, C. (2017). Online Self-regulated Learning Questionnaire in a Russian MOOC. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 966–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, T. F. (2000). Individualizing instruction in a Web-based hypermedia learning environment: Nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 219–251.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2014). Supporting professional learning in a Massive Open Online Course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 197–213.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2016). How health professionals regulate their learning in Massive Open Online Courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 113–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, L., & Jingyan, L. (2017). Assessing the effectiveness of self-regulated learning in MOOCs using macro-level behavioural sequence data. Proceedings of Work in Progress Papers of the Experience and Research Tracks and Position Papers of the Policy Track at EMOOCs 2017 co-located with the EMOOCs 2017 Conference (1–9). Leganés (Madrid), Spain: CEUR.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, D. C., & Ringdal, A. (2012). Self-regulated learning in the classroom: A literature review on the teacher’s role. Education Research International, 2012, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Onah, D. F., & Sinclair, J. E. (2016). A multi-dimensional investigation of self-regulated learning in a blended classroom context: A case study on eLDa MOOC. International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (pp. 63–85). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Onah, D. F. O., & Sinclair, J. E. (2017). Assessing self-regulation of learning dimensions in a stand-alone MOOC platform. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 7(2), 4–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossiannilsson, E., Altinay, F., & Altinay, Z. (2016). MOOCs as change agents to boost innovation in higher education learning arenas. Education Sciences, 6(3), 25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Álvarez, R., Maldonado-Mahauad, J. J., Sapunar-Opazo, D., & Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (2017). NoteMyProgress: A tool to support learners’ self-regulated learning strategies in MOOC environments. European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 460–466). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, N. E., & Rahim, A. (2011). Studying self-regulated learning in classrooms. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 122–136). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phan, T., McNeil, S. G., & Robin, B. R. (2016). Students’ patterns of engagement and course performance in a Massive Open Online Course. Computers & Education, 95, 36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (Technical report 91-b-004). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. Handbook of Self-Regulation, 451, 451–502.
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, J. (2015). Rebooting MOOC research. Science, 347(6217), 34–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks, K., & Leijen, Ä. (2014). Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulated learning and measuring them in the e-learning context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 190–198.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. (2017). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2017. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/mooc-stats-2017/
   Google Scholar
• Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013–2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 198–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Yu, J. H., Alamri, H., & Mueller, C. (2017). Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 114, 274–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D., & Schulte, A. C. (1987). Learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E., Zimmerman, S. A., & Palmer, D. R. (1988). Assessing learning strategies: The design and development of the LASSI. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz and P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 25–40). Elservier.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(4), 327–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, 93, 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. JISC CETIS. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014–2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar