REFERENCES
- Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of science: Perspectives and resources. Saint Paul, MN: SHiPS Education Press.
- Atkin, J. M., & Black, P. J. (2003). Inside science education reform: A history of curricular and policy change. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291.
- Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2011). Considering materiality in educational policy: Messy objects and multiple reals. Educational Policy, 61, 707–726.
- Gleason, T. (2016). Scientific literacy and the ontology of science education: A case study of learning in the outdoors (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (Accession No. oregon 11631). University of Oregon in Eugene, OR.
- Gorur, R. (2011). ANT on the PISA trail: Following the statistical pursuit of certainty. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 76–93.
- Harding, S. (2006). Science and social inequality: Feminist and postcolonial issues. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
- Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Latour, B. (1991). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Law, J. (2008). On sociology and STS. Sociological Review, 56, 623–649.
- National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for new K-12 science education standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Pierce, C. (2013). Learning about a fish from an ANT: Actor network theory and science education in the postgenomic era. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10, 83–107.
- Radloff, J. (2015). On teaching the nature of science: Perspectives and resources. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 527–538.
- van Eijck, M. (2012). Capturing the dynamics of science in science education. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. Dordecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92, 941–967.
- Wynter, S., & McKittrick, K. (2015). Unparalleled catastrophe for our species? Or, to give humanness a different future: conversations. In K. McKittrick, Ed. Sylvia Wynter: On being human as praxis (pp. 9–89). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.