Whose STEM? Disrupting the Gender Crisis Within STEM

REFERENCES

• Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. J. (Eds.). (2009). Material feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alper, J. (1993). The pipeline is leaking women all the way along. Science, 260(5106), 409–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillion, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: Primary school girls' and parents' constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), 171–194.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief, ( 04–11).
   Google Scholar
• Berryman, S. E. (1983). Who will do science? Trends, and their causes in minority and female representation among holders of advanced degrees in science and mathematics. New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2012). My fair physicist? Feminine math and science role models demotivate young girls. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 738–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bug, A. (2003). Has feminism changed physics? Signs, 28(3), 881–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218–261. doi:10.1037/a0014412s
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 413–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw a scientist test. Science Education, 67(2): 255–265. doi:10.1002/sce.3730670213
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, L., Nielsen, K., Strauss, E. J., Tanner, K. D., Atkins, J. M., Bequette, M. B., & Phillips, M. (2008). Girls in science: A framework for action. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheryan, S., & Plaut, V. C. (2010). Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest. Sex Roles, 63(7–8), 475–488. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9835-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colatrella, C. (2011). Toys and tools in pink: Cultural narratives of gender, science, and technology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., Weisgram, E. S., & Belanger, A. L. (2015). New routes to recruiting and retaining women in STEM: Policy implications of a communal goal congruity perspective. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 52–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying the model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, E. (2015). To get girls in STEM, let them ‘play’—and show them the money. Fortune.
   Google Scholar
• Girlstart. (2011). “ About us.” Retrieved fromhttp://www.girlstart.org/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Gowaty, P. A. (2003). Sexual natures: How feminism changed evolutionary biology. Signs, 28(3), 901–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender- related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological science in the public interest, 8(1), 1–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies, 14(3), 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (p.149–181). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science/ whose knowledge? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, S. D., Adelman, R. M., Bodford, J. E., Graudejus, O., Okun, M. A., & Kwan, V. S. (2016). The effects of a female role model on academic performance and persistence of women in STEM courses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38(5), 258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Corbett, C., St Rose, A., & American Association of University Women. (2010). Why so few?: Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, D.C: AAUW.
   Google Scholar
• Hinsdale, M. J. (2015). Empathy blues at the colonial difference: Underrepresented undergraduate women in STEM. Philosophy of Education Archive, 236–244.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. E. (2005). Twenty-five years of research on gender and ethnic differences in math and science career choices: What have we learned? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (110), 85–94. doi: 10.1002/cd.151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1990). Secrets of God, nature, and life. History of the Human Sciences, 3(2), 229–242.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1995). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1987). Can there be a feminist science? Hypatia, 2(3), 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 333–340.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (2004). How values can be good for science. In P. Machamer & G. Wolters (Eds.), Science, values, and objectivity (pp. 127–142). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math-science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(2), 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of A concept. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 240–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women's math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1183–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., & Wai, J. (2015). The bachelor's to Ph.D. STEM pipeline no longer leaks more women than men: A 30-year analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattheis, A., Nelson, J., Crus-Ramirez de Arellano, D., & Yoder, J. (2017). Queer in STEM: A study of sexualities and gender diversity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved from queerstem.org
   Google Scholar
• National Girls Collaborative Project. (2017). Retrieved from https://ngcproject.org/
   Google Scholar
• Smeding, A. (2012). Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): An investigation of their implicit gender stereotypes and stereotypes' connectedness to math performance. Sex roles, 67(11–12), 617–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of experimental social psychology, 35(1), 4–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STEMettes. (2011). “In the beginning … a journey is about to start.” Retrieved from http://stemettes.org/blog/2012/12/03/in-the-beginning/
   Google Scholar
• Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Husinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). Steming the tide: Using in group experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedemann, J. (2000). Parents' gender stereotypes and teachers' beliefs as predictors of children's concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 144–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuana, N. (2008). Viscous porosity: Witnessing Katrina. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 188–213). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisgram, E., & Diekman, A. (2015). Family friendly STEM: Perspectives on recruiting and retaining women in STEM fields. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 8(1), 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 11–26. doi 10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar