REFERENCES
- Barney , L. D. Jr and Danielson , M. G. 2004 . “Ranking mutually exclusive projects: The role of duration,” . The Engineering Economist , Vol. 49 : 43 – 61 . No. 1[CSA]
- Beaves , R. G. 1988 . “Net present value and rate of return: Implicit and explicit reinvestment assumptions,” . The Engineering Economist , Vol. 33 : 275 – 302 . [CSA]
- Beaves , R. G. 1993 . “The case for a generalized net present value formula,” . The Engineering Economist , Vol. 38 : 119 – 133 . No. 2[CSA]
- Bernhard , R. H. 1979 . “Modified rates of return for investment project evaluation—A comparison and critique,” . The Engineering Economist , Vol. 24 : 161 – 167 . No. 3[CSA]
- Bernhard , R. H. 1989 . “Base selection for modified rates of return and its irrelevance for optimal project choice,” . The Engineering Economist , Vol. 35 : 55 – 65 . [CSA]
- Lin , S. A.Y. 1976 . “The modified rate of return and investment criterion,” . The Engineering Economist , Vol. 21 : 237 – 247 . No. 4[CSA]
- Shull , D. M. 1994 . “Overall rates of return: Investment bases, reinvestment rates and time horizons,” . The Engineering Economist , Vol. 30 : 139 – 163 . No. 2[CSA]