Convex rear view mirrors compromise distance and time-to-contact judgements

References

• Ayres , T. , Li , L. , Trachtman , D. and Young , D. 2005 . Passenger-side rear-view mirrors: driver behavior and safety . International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 35 : 157 – 162 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaupre , J. , Hause , M. and Hammer , B. 2003 . “ Evaluation of systems to monitor blind areas behind trucks used in road construction and maintenance: Phase 1 ” . National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health . Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/elcosh/docs/d0600/d000649/d000649.html (accessed 25 June 2004)
   Google Scholar
• Bertamini , M. , Spooner , A. and Hecht , H. 2003 . Naive optics: Predicting and perceiving reflections in mirrors . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance , 29 : 982 – 1002 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croucher , C. J. , Bertamini , M. and Hecht , H. 2002 . Naive optics: Understanding the geometry of mirror reflections . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance , 28 : 546 – 562 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLucia , P. R. 1999 . Size-arrival effects: The potential roles of conflicts between monocular and binocular time-to-contact information, and of computer aliasing . Perception & Psychophysics , 61 : 1168 – 1177 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher , J. A. and Galer , I. A. 1984 . The effects of decreasing the radius of curvature of convex external rear view mirrors upon drivers' judgements of vehicles approaching in the rearward visual field . Ergonomics , 27 : 1209 – 1224 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannagan , M. J. , Sivak , M. , Schumann , J. , Traube , E. C. and Kojima , S. 1997 . “ Distance perception in driver-side and passenger-side convex rearview mirrors: Objects in mirrors are more complicated than they appear. Report no. UMTRI-97–32, July 1997 ” . Michegan : The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute . Available online at: http://www.umich.edu/∼industry/rearvision.html (abstract accessed 1 August 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Flannagan , M. , Sivak , M. and Traube , E. 1996 . Driver perceptual adaptation to nonplanar rearview mirrors . SAE Technical Papers , no. 960791
   Google Scholar
• Higashiyama , A. , Yokoyama , Y. and Shimono , K. 2001 . Perceived distance of targets in convex mirrors . Japanese Psychological Research , 43 : 13 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashiyama , A. and Shimono , K. 2004 . Mirror vision: Perceived size and perceived distances of virtual images . Perception & Psychophysics , 66 : 679 – 691 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht , H. , Bertamini , M. and Gamer , M. 2005 . Naïve optics: Acting on mirror reflections . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance , 31 : 1023 – 1038 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht , H. and Savelsbergh , G. J.P. 2004 . “ Theories of time-to-contact judgment ” . In Time-to-contact , Edited by: Hecht , H. and Savelsbergh , G. J.P. Amsterdam : Elsevier Science Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Lee , D. N. 1976 . A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision . Perception , 5 : 437 – 459 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoma , J. , Sivak , M. and Flannagan , M. J. 1995 . Effects of driver-side mirror type on lane-change accidents . Ergonomics , 39 : 1973 – 1978 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoma , J. , Sivak , M. and Flannagan , M. J. 2000 . Effects of nonplanar driver-side mirrors on lane-change crashes . Transportation Human Factors , 2 : 279 – 289 .
   Google Scholar
• Moukhwas , D. 1987 . Road junction convex mirrors . Applied Ergonomics , 18 : 133 – 136 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourant , R. R. and Donohue , R. J. 1977 . Acquisition of indirect vision information by novice, experienced, and mature drivers . Journal of Safety Research , 9 : 39 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber , C. O. 1931 . Visual-motor coordination in concave and convex mirror space . American Journal of Psychology , 43 : 254 – 260 .
   Google Scholar