Spatial stimulus response compatibility for a horizontal visual display with hand and foot controls

References

• Andre , A. D. , Haskell , I. and Wickens , C. D. S-R compatibility effects with orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions . Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th annual meeting . pp. 1546 – 1550 . Santa Monica, CA : Human Factors Society .
   Google Scholar
• Annett , M. 2002 . “ The right shift theory of handedness ” . In Handedness and brain asymmetry: the right shift theory , Edited by: Annett , M. 48 – 71 . New York : Taylor and Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Augustyn , C. and Peters , M. 1986 . On the relation between footedness and handedness . Perceptual and Motor Skills , 63 : 1115 – 1118 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisiach , E. 1982 . Hemispheric lateralization of the decisional stage in choice reaction times to visual unstructured stimuli . Cortex , 18 : 191 – 198 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan , A. H.S. and Chan , K. W.L. 2004 . Design implications from spatial compatibility on parallel and orthogonal stimulus-response arrays . Asian Journal of Ergonomics , 5 ( 2 ) : 111 – 129 .
   Google Scholar
• Chan , A. H.S. and Chan , K. W.L. 2010 . Three-dimensional spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility for visual signals with hand and foot controls . Applied Ergonomics , 41 : 840 – 848 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan , A. H.S. , Chan , K. W.L. and Yu , R. F. 2007 . Auditory stimulus-response compatibility and control-display design . Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science , 8 ( 6 ) : 557 – 581 .
   Google Scholar
• Chan , K. W.L. and Chan , A. H.S. 2005 . Spatial S-R compatibility of visual and auditory signals: implications for human–machine interface design . Displays , 26 : 109 – 119 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan , K. W.L. and Chan , A. H.S. 2009 . Spatial stimulus–response (S-R) compatibility for foot controls with visual displays . International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 39 : 396 – 402 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan , W. H. and Chan , A. H.S. 2003 . Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display – computer simulated test and real hardware test . Applied Ergonomics , 34 ( 1 ) : 61 – 71 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapanis , A. and Lindenbaum , L. E. 1959 . A reaction time study of four control-display linkages . Human Factors , 1 : 1 – 7 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho , Y. S. and Proctor , R. W. 2003 . Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects . Psychonomic Bulletin and Review , 10 ( 1 ) : 45 – 73 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chua , R. 2001 . Influence of operator orientation on relative organizational mapping and spatial compatibility . Ergonomics , 44 ( 8 ) : 751 – 765 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coren , S. 1993 . The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults . Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 31 ( 1 ) : 1 – 3 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts , P. M. 1951 . “ Engineering psychology and equipment design ” . In Handbook of experimental psychology , Edited by: Stevens , S. S. 1287 – 1340 . New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Fitts , P. M. and Deininger , R. L. 1954 . S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes . Journal of Experimental Psychology , 48 : 483 – 492 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitts , P. M. and Seeger , C. M. 1953 . S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes . Journal of Experiment Psychology , 46 : 199 – 210 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann , E. R. 1991 . A comparison of hand and foot movement times . Ergonomics , 34 ( 4 ) : 397 – 406 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann , E. R. 2009 . Do paper-and-pencil tests give an accurate measure of stereotype strength? A review of available data . International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 39 ( 5 ) : 904 – 912 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel , B. 1996 . No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes . Perception and Psychophysics , 58 ( 1 ) : 102 – 110 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karwowski , W. 2005 . Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science, engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems . Ergonomics , 48 ( 5 ) : 436 – 463 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim , S. H. and Kaber , D. B. 2009 . Design and evaluation of dynamic text-editing methods using foot pedals . International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 29 : 358 – 365 .
   Google Scholar
• Lee , F. C.H. and Chan , A. H.S. 2007 . Attending visual and auditory signals: ergonomics recommendations with consideration of signal modality and spatial stimulus–response (S–R) compatibility . International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 37 ( 3 ) : 197 – 206 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendenhall , W. , Beaver , R. J. and Beaver , M. B. 2006 . Introduction to probability and statistics , 12th edn , Belmont, CA : Duxbury .
   Google Scholar
• Murata , A. and Moriwaka , M. 2007 . Applicability of location compatibility to the arrangement of display and control in human – vehicle systems: comparison between young and older adults . Ergonomics , 50 ( 1 ) : 99 – 111 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoletti , R. and Umilta , C. 1984 . Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility . Perception and Psychophysics , 35 ( 4 ) : 333 – 345 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoletti , R. and Umilta , C. 1985 . Responding with hand and foot: the right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present . Perceptional and Psychophysics , 38 ( 3 ) : 211 – 216 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olex-Zarychta , D. and Raczek , J. 2008 . The relationship of movement time to hand-foot laterality patterns . Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition , 13 ( 5 ) : 439 – 455 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters , M. 1988 . Footedness: asymmetries in foot preference and skill and neuropsychological assessment of foot movement . Psychological Bulletin , 103 ( 2 ) : 179 – 192 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters , M. and Durding , B. M. 1979 . Footedness of left- and right-handers . American Journal of Psychology , 92 : 133 – 142 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor , R. W. and Reeve , T. G. 1990 . Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective Amsterdam, North Holland
   Google Scholar
• Proctor , R. W. and Vu , K. P.L. 2006 . Stimulus-response compatibility principles , Boca Raton, FL : Taylor & Francis Group .
   Google Scholar
• Rubichi , S. , Nicoletti , R. and Umilta , C. 2005 . Right-left prevalence with task-irrelevant spatial codes . Psychological Research , 69 : 167 – 178 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders , M. S. and McCormick , E. J. 1993 . Human factors in engineering and design , 7th edn , Singapore : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Sen , R. N. and Das , S. 2000 . An ergonomics study on compatibility of controls of overhead cranes in a heavy engineering factory in West Bengal . Applied Ergonomics , 31 ( 2 ) : 179 – 184 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Short , M. W. and Cauraugh , J. H. 1999 . Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect . Acta Psychologica , 100 ( 3 ) : 243 – 252 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonen , R. L. 1995 . Comparison of foot and hand reaction times among men: a methodologic study using simple and multiple-choice repeated measurements . Perceptual and Motor Skills , 80 : 1243 – 1249 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tlauka , M. 2004 . Display-control compatibility: the relationship between performance and judgments of performance . Ergonomics , 47 ( 3 ) : 281 – 295 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umilta , C. and Nicoletti , R. 1990 . “ Spatial stimulus-response compatibility ” . In Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective Edited by: Proctor , R. W. and Reeve , T. G. 86 – 116 . Amsterdam, North-Holland
   Google Scholar
• Vu , K.-P. L. and Proctor , R. W. 2002 . The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions . Perception and Psychophysics , 64 : 815 – 828 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu , K.-P. L. and Proctor , R. W. 2003 . Naive and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility: implications for interface design . Ergonomics , 46 ( 1–3 ) : 169 – 187 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner , D. W. , Kirschweng , R. L. and Reed , M. 2009 . Foot motions in manual material handling transfer tasks: a taxonomy and data from an automotive assembly plant . Ergonomics , 52 ( 3 ) : 362 – 383 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , B. 2007 . Global topological dominance in the left hemisphere . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 104 : 21014 – 21019 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weeks , D. J. and Proctor , R. W. 1990 . Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus-response dimension . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 119 : 355 – 366 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worringham , C. J. and Beringer , D. B. 1989 . Operator orientation and compatibility in visual-motor task performance . Ergonomics , 32 ( 4 ) : 387 – 399 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worringham , C. J. and Beringer , D. B. 1998 . Directional stimulus-response compatibility: a test of three alternative principles . Ergonomics , 41 ( 6 ) : 864 – 880 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu , S. P. 1997 . Further studies on the spatial compatibility of four control-display linkages . International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 19 ( 5 ) : 353 – 360 .
   Google Scholar