Statistical modelling of networked human-automation performance using working memory capacity

REFERENCES

• Barnes, M., and F.Jentsch. 2010. Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bayrak, T., and M.Grabowski. 2006. “Network Performance Impacts on Operators in Safety-Critical Systems.” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making5: 173–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, C.2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boussesmart, Y., J.Fargeas, M.Cummings, and N.Roy. 2009. Comparing Learning Techniques for Hidden Markov Models of Human Supervisory Control Behavior. Seattle, WA: AIAA Infotech@Aerospace'09 Conference and AIAA Unmanned …. Unlimited Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J.2010. “UAV-Guided Navigation for Ground Robot Tele-Operation in a Military Reconnaissance Environment.” Ergonomics53: 940–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and C.Joyner. 2008. “Concurrent Performance of Gunner's and Robotic Operator's Tasks in a Multitasking Environment.” Military Psychology21: 98–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, N., H.Pringle, H.Pedersen, and O.Connor. 2006. Human Factors of Remotely Operated Vehicles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cosenzo, K., R.Parasuraman, and E.de Visser. 2010. “Automation Strategies for Facilitating Human Interaction with Military Uninhabited Vehicles.” In Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations, edited by M.Barnes, and F.Jenstch, 103–123. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, M., A.Brezinski, and J.Lee. 2007. “Operator Performance and Intelligent Aiding in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Scheudling.” IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22 (2): 52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, M., and S.Guerlain. 2004. Human Performance Issues in Supervisory Control of Autonomous Airborne Vehicles. Anaheim, CA: AUVSI's Unmanned Systems North America 2004 Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, M., and S.Guerlain. 2007. “Developing Operator Capacity Estimates for Supervisory Control of Autonomous Vehicles.” Human Factors49 (1): 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, M., and P.Mitchell. 2008. “Predicting Controller Capacity in Supervisory Control of Multiple UAVs.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans38: 451–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Visser, E., and R.Parasuraman. 2011. “Adaptive Aiding of Human-Robot Teaming: Effects of Imperfect Automation on Performance, Trust, and Workload.” Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making5 (2): 209–231.
   Google Scholar
• de Visser, E., T.Shaw, A.Mohamed-Ameen, and R.Parasuraman. 2010. Modeling Human-Automation Team Performance in Networked Systems: Individual Differences in Working Memory Count. Santa Monica, CA: Annual Conference of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Devore, J.2004. ProbaBility and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Donmez, B., C.Nehme, and M.Cummings. 2010. “Modeling Workload Impact in Multiple Unmanned Vehicle Supervisory Control.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans40 (6): 1180–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M.1995. “Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society1: 32–64.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R.2002. “Working Memory as Executive Attention.” Current Directions in Psychological Science11: 19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., P.-C.Chen, and J.Yen. 2010. “Learning HMM-Based Cognitive Load Models for Supporting Human-Agent Teamwork.” Cognitive Systems Research11: 108–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, S., B.Knott, and R.Brown. 2006. Managing Multiple UAVs: Are We Asking the Right Questions?2639–2643. San Francisco, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Heckerman, D.1998. “A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks.” In Learning in Graphical Models, edited by M.Jordan, 301–354. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Heger, F., and S.Singh. 2006. Sliding Autonomy for Complex Coordinated Multi-Robot Tasks: Analysis & Experiments. Philadelphia, PA: Robotics: Science and Systems II.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Planning and Development Office. 2007. Concept of Operations for the Next Generation Air Transportation System. Version 2.0. Available for public download from http://www.jpdo.gov/library/NextGen_v2.0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Larue, G., A.Rakotonirainy, and A.Pettitt. 2010. “Real-Time Performance Modeling of a Sustained Attention to Response Task.” Ergonomics49 (1): 1205–1216.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M., J.Wang, and P.Scerri. 2006. Teamwork Coordination for Realistically Complex Multirobot Systems, 1–12. Neully-sur-Seine: NATO-RTO.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M., H.Wang, P.Velagapudi, P.Scerri, and K.Sycara. 2009. Using Humans As Sensors in Robotic Search, 1249–1256. Seattle, WA: International Conference on Information Fusion.
   Google Scholar
• Manoj, B., and A.Baker. 2007. “Communication Challenges in Emergency Response.” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery50 (3): 51–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K.2001. “The Bayes Net Toolbox for Matlab.” Computing Science and Statistics33 (2): 1024–1034.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, W., R.Bolia, M.Vidulich, and A.Langhorne. 2004. User-Centered Evaluation of Multi-National Communication and Collaborative Technologies in a Network-Centric Air Battle Management Environment, 731–735. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R.2010. “Neurogenetic of Working Memory and Decision Making Under Time Pressure.” In Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, edited by W.Karwowski, and G.Salvendy. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., K.Cosenzo, and E.de Visser. 2009. “Adaptive Automation for Human Supervision of Multiple Uninhabited Vehicles: Effecs on Change Detection, Situtation Awareness, and Mental Workload.” Military Psychology21: 270–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., S.Galster, P.Squire, H.Furukawa, and C.Miller. 2005. “A Flexible Delegation-Type Interface Enhances System Performance in Human Supervision of Multiple Robots: Empirical Studies with RoboFlag.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans35: 481–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., and V.Riley. 1997. “Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse.” Human Factors39 (2): 230–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., and C.Williams. 2001. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snelson, E., C.Rasmussen, and Z.Gharamani. 2004. “Warped Gaussian Processes.” Vancouver, Canada, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems16: 337–344.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C., S.Dixon, and M.Ambinder. 2006. “Workload and Automation Reliability in UAVs.” In Human Factors of Remotely Operated Vehicles, edited by N.Cooke, H.Pringle, H.Pedersen, and O.Connor, 209–222. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar