Governance of complex systems: results of a sociological simulation experiment

REFERENCES

• Bellet, Thierry, BéatriceBailly-Asuni, PierreMayenobe, and AurélieBanet. 2009. “A Theoretical and Methodological Framework for Studying and Modelling Drivers' Mental Representations.” Safety Science47: 1205–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, Arthur, SusanneLütz, UweSchimank, and GeorgSimonis, eds. 2007. Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bonabeau, Eric. 2002. “Agent-Based Modeling: Methods and Techniques for Simulating Human Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences99 (90003): 7280–7287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio. 2010. “A Methodology for Complex Social Simulations.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation13  (1): 7. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/13/1/7.html.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Joshua M., and RobertAxtell. 1996. Growing Artificial Societies. Social Science from the Bottom Up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, Hartmut. 1991. Alltagshandeln und Verstehen. Zum Verhältnis von erklärender und verstehender Soziologie am Beispiel von Alfred Schütz und ‘Rational Choice’. Tübingen: Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, Hartmut. 1993. “The Rationality of Everyday Behavior: A Rational Choice Reconstruction of the Theory of Action by Alfred Schutz.” Rationality and Society5: 7–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, Amitai. 1967. “Mixed Scanning: A ‘Third’ Approach to Decision-Making.” Public Administration Review27 (5): 385–392. http://dspace.wrlc.org/bitstream/1961/378/1/A49.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, Robin D., and JohannesWeyer. Forthcoming. “Interaction of Human Actors and Non-human Agents. A Sociological Simulation Model of Hybrid Systems.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Nigel, PetraAhrweiler, and AndreasPyka. 2010. “Learning in Innovation Networks. Some Simulation Experiments.” In Innovation in Complex Social Systems, edited by PetraAhrweiler, 235–249. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, Nigel, and Klaus G.Troitzsch. 2005. Simulation for the Social Scientist. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, Edgar. 2012. “Governance-Forschung in der Governance-Falle?–Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift53 (4): 565–592.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, Jan, and MartijnVan Vliet. 2000. “Self-governance as a Mode of Societal Governance.” Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory2 (3): 359–378.
   Google Scholar
• Krauß, Stefan. 1998. “Microscopic Modeling of Traffic Flow: Investigation of Collision Free Vehicle Dynamics.” PhD thesis, Universität zu Köln, Köln. http://sumo.sourceforge.net/docs/KraussDiss.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kron, Thomas. 2010. Zeitgenössische soziologische Theorien. Zentrale Beiträge aus Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kroneberg, Clemens. 2005. “Die Definition der Situation und die variable Rationalität der Akteure. Ein allgemeines Modell des Handelns.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie34: 344–363.
   Google Scholar
• Kroneberg, Clemens, MeirYaish, and VolkerStocke. 2010. “Norms and Rationality in Electoral Participation and in the Rescue of Jews in WWII: An Application of the Model of Frame Selection.” Rationality and Society22 (1): 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroniger, Jens, and FabianLücke. 2010. “Analyse und Evaluation von Steuerungsmodellen am Beispiel von Verkehrstelematiksystemen.” Diploma thesis, TU Dortmund.
   Google Scholar
• LaPorte, Todd R., and Paula M.Consolini. 1991. “Working in Practice but Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of ‘High Reliability Organizations’.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory1: 19–47.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, Derk Albert. 2007. Transition Management. New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development. Utrecht: International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1988. Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Mayntz, Renate. 1988. “Funktionelle Teilsysteme in der Theorie sozialer Differenzierung.” In Differenzierung und Verselbständigung. Zur Entwicklung gesellschaftlicher Teilsysteme, edited by R.Mayntz, BerndRosewitz, and UweSchimank, 11–44. Frankfurt/M: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Mayntz, Renate. 1993. “Policy-Netzwerke und die Logik von Verhandlungssystemen.” In Policy-Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung (Sonderheft 24 der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift), edited by AdrienneHéritier, 39–56. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mayntz, Renate, and Fritz W.Scharpf. 1995. “Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus.” In Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, edited by R.Mayntz and F. W.Scharpf, 39–72. Frankfurt/M: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2000. “Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives14: 137–158. http://192.12.12.16/events/workshops/images/b/b3/Ostrom2000.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems.” The American Economic Review100 (3): 641–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, Michael. 1995. Turtles, Termites, and Traffic Jams. Explorations in Massively Parallel Microworlds (Complex Adaptive Systems). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Klaus, and Jan-MichaelRost. 2004. Komplexe Systeme. Frankfurt/M: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Karlene A., ed. 1993. New Challenges to Understanding Organisations. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Salganik, Matthew J., Peter S.Dodds, and Duncan J.Watts. 2006. “Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market.” Science311 (5762): 854–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimank, Uwe. 2000. Handeln und Strukturen. Einführung in eine akteurtheoretische Soziologie. München: Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Volker, and Johannes M.Bauer. 2009. “Von der Governance- zur Komplexitätstheorie. Entwicklungen der Theorie gesellschaftlicher Ordnung.” In Management komplexer Systeme. Konzepte für die Bewältigung von Intransparenz, Unsicherheit und Chaos, edited by JohannesWeyer and IngoSchulz-Schaeffer, 31–53. München: Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Squazzoni, Flaminio. 2008. “The Micro-Macro Link in Social Simulation.” Sociologica2008: 1–26, www.sociologica.mulino.it/doi/10.2383/26578.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, Neville A., Guy H.Walker, and Linda J.Sorensen. 2012. “It's a Small World After All: Contrasting Hierarchical and Edge Networks in a Simulated Intelligence Analysis Task.” Ergonomics55 (3): 265–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, Neville A., GuyH. Walker, MarkS. Young, TaraKazi, and Paul M. Salmon. 2007. “Changing Drivers' Minds: The Evaluation of an Advanced Driver Coaching System.” Ergonomics50 (8): 1209–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SUMO. 2010. SUMO: Simulation of Urban Mobility (0.12). Berlin: German Aerospace Center, Institute of Transportation Systems, http://sumo.sourceforge.net.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, James. 2005. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Treib, Oliver, HolgerBähr, and GerdaFalkner. 2007. “Modes of Governance: Towards a Conceptual Clarification.” Journal of European Public Policy14: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dam, Koen H., IgorNikolic, and ZofiaLukszo, eds. 2013. Agent-Based Modelling of Socio-technical Systems. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Guy H., Neville A. Stanton, Paul M. Salmon, Daniel P. Jenkins, and LauraRafferty. 2010. “Translating Concepts of Complexity to the Field Of Ergonomics.” Ergonomics53 (10): 1175–1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyer, Johannes, and IngoSchulz-Schaeffer, eds. 2009. Management komplexer Systeme. Konzepte für die Bewältigung von Intransparenz, Unsicherheit und Chaos. München: Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Weyer, Johannes, Robin D.Fink, and TobiasLiboschik. 2011. “Softwarebasierte Methoden der Netzwerk-Analyse.” In Soziale Netzwerke. Konzepte und Methoden der sozialwissenschaftlichen Netzwerkforschung (2. Aufl.), edited by JohannesWeyer, 109–131. München: Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Willke, Helmut. 1995. Systemtheorie III: Steuerungstheorie. Grundzüge einer Theorie der Steuerung komplexer Sozialsysteme. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Willke, Helmut. 2007. Smart Governance. Governing the Global Knowledge Society. Frankfurt/M: Campus.
   Google Scholar