Assessing the impact of typeface design in a text-rich automotive user interface

References

• Attneave, F., and M. D.Arnoult. 1956. “The Quantitative Study of Shape and Pattern Perception.” Psychological Bulletin53 (6): 452–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E. C., M. C.Willson, A. H.Wilman, S.Dave, and P. H.Silverstone. 2006. “Males and Females Differ in Brain Activation during Cognitive Tasks.” NeuroImage30 (2): 529–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigelow, C., and S. Matteson. 2011. “Font Improvements in Cockpit Displays and Their Relevance to Automotive Safety.” Paper presented at the Society of Information Displays 2011 Vehicle Displays and Interfaces Symposium, University of Michigan-Dearborn.
   Google Scholar
• Bouma, H.1970. “Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition.” Nature226 (5241): 117–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma, H.1973. “Visual Interference in the Parafoveal Recognition of Initial and Final Letters of Words.” Vision Research13 (4): 762–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P., D. C.Miller, and W. D.Schafer. 1999. “Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin125 (3): 367–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, H., and P. Green. 2005. “Range of Character Heights for Vehicle Displays as Predicted by 22 Equations.” Proceedings of the SID Vehicle Display Symposium, Dearborn, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysler, S. T., P. J.Carlson, and H. G.Hawkins. 2003. Headlamp Illumination Provided to Sign Positions by Passenger Vehicles. Austin: Texas Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Conover, W. J., and R. L.Iman. 1981. “Rank Transformations as a Bridge between Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics.” American Statistician35 (3): 124–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group. 2006. “Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems.” Version 2.0, Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L., and P.Wasielewski. 1983. “Risky Driving Related to Driver and Vehicle Characteristics.” Accident Analysis & Prevention15 (2): 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiset, D., C.Blais, C.Ethier-Majcher, M.Arguin, D.Bub, and F.Gosselin. 2008. “Features for Identification of Uppercase and Lowercase Letters.” Psychological Science19 (11): 1161–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujikake, K., S.Hasegawa, M.Omori, H.Takada, and M.Miyano. 2007. “Readability of Character Size for Car Navigation Systems.” Human Interface and the Management of Information. Interacting in Information Environments, Lecture Notes in Computer Science4558: 503–509.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, P. M., M. T.Pietrucha, and D. T.Meeker. 1997. “Effects of Font and Capitalization on Legibility of Guide Signs.” Transportation Research Reccord1605: 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, P. M., M. T.Pietrucha, and D. T.Meeker. 1998. “Clearer Road Signs Ahead.” Ergonomics in Design6 (3): 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Holick, A. J., S. T.Chrysler, E. S.Park, and P. J.Carlson. 2006. Evaluation of the Clearview Font for Negative Contrast Traffic Signs. Austin: Texas Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Iman, R. L.1974. “A Power Study of a Rank Transform for the Two-Way Classification Model When Interactions May Be Present.” Canadian Journal of Statistics2 (2): 227–239.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 15007-1. 2002. Road Vehicles – Measurement of Driver Visual Behaviour with Respect to Transport Information and Control Systems – Part 1: Definitions and Parameters. Geneva: International Standards Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 15007-2. 2001. Road Vehicles – Measurement of Driver Visual Behaviour with Respect to Transport Information and Control Systems – Part 2: Equipment and Procedures. Geneva: International Standards Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 15008. 2009. Ergonomic Aspects of Transport Information and Control Systems – Specification and Test Procedures for In-Vehicle Visual Presentation. Geneva: International Standards Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Y. Y., M. J. J.Wang, and R.Lin. 2009. “Usability Evaluation of E-Books.” Displays30 (2): 49–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. S., N. E.Lane, K. S.Berbaum, and M. G.Lilienthal. 1993. “Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness.” The Interantional Journal of Aviation Psychology3 (3): 203–220.
   Google Scholar
• Klauer, S. G., T. A.Dingus, V. L.Neale, J. D.Sudweeks, and D. J.Ramsey. 2006. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data (Report No. DOT HS 810 594). Washington, DC: United States Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Legge, G. E., and C. A.Bigelow. 2011. “Does Print Size Matter for Reading? A Review of Findings from Vision Science and Typography.” Journal of Vision11 (5): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler, B., B.Reimer, J. F.Coughlin, and J. A.Dusek. 2009. “The Impact of Incremental Increases in Cognitive Workload on Physiological Arousal and Performance in Young Adult Drivers.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2138: 6–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2013. Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices (Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0053). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
   Google Scholar
• O'Day, S., and L.Tijerina. 2011. “Legibility: Back to the Basics.” SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems4 (1): 591–604.
   Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G., N. J.Majaj, N.Raizman, C. J.Christian, E.Kim, and M. C.Palomares. 2009. “Grouping in Object Recognition: The Role of a Gestalt Law in Letter Identification.” Cognitive Neuropsychology26 (1): 36–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G., K. A.Tillman, J.Freeman, M.Su, T. D.Berger, and N. J.Majaj. 2007. “Crowding and Eccentricity Determine Reading Rate.” Journal of Vision7 (2): 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, B., L. A.D'Ambrosio, J. F.Coughlin, M. E.Kafrissen, and J.Biederman. 2006. “Using Self-Reported Data to Assess the Validity of Driving Simulation Data.” Behavior Research Methods38 (2): 314–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, B., B.Mehler, and J. F.Coughlin. 2012. An Evaluation of Typeface Design in a Text-Rich Automotive User Interface (MIT AgeLab White Paper 2012-12). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, B., B.Mehler, J.Dobres, and J. F.Coughlin. 2013. The Effects of a Production Level ‘Voice-Command’ Interface on Driver Behavior: Reported Workload, Physiology, Visual Attention, and Driving Performance (Technical Report 2013-17a). Cambridge, MA: MIT AgeLab.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén, M.2001. “Gender Differences in Reading Performance on Documents across Countries.” Reading and Writing14 (1–2): 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz-Anker, E.1970. “Syntax-Antiqua, a Sans Serif on a New Basis.” Gebrauchsgraphik7: 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Speck, O., T.Ernst, J.Braun, C.Koch, E.Miller, and L.Chang. 2000. “Gender Differences in the Functional Organization of the Brain for Working Memory.” Neuroreport11 (11): 2581–2585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinker, M. A.1963. Legibility of Print. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., B.Reimer, B.Mehler, V.Lammers, L. A.D'Ambrosio, and J. F.Coughlin. 2010. “The Validity of Driving Simulation for Assessing Differences between In-Vehicle Informational Interfaces: A Comparison with Field Testing.” Ergonomics53 (3): 404–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar