Testing usability and trainability of indirect touch interaction: perspective for the next generation of air traffic control systems

References

• Alapetite, A., R. Fogh, H. B. Andersen, and A. G. Özkil. 2013. “A Deported View Concept for Touch Interaction.” Paper presented at the ACHI, the Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, Nice, France.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, R., M.Causse, F.Vachon, R.Parise, F.Dehais, and P.Terrier. 2012. “Evaluation of Head-Free Eye Tracking as an Input Device for Air Traffic Control.” Ergonomics56 (2): 246–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, R., P.Terrier, R.Parise, and J.-M.Cellier. 2009. “Effet d'une décorrélation visuo-motrice sur le mouvement de pointage.” Le Travail Humain72: 245–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard, C., L.Hay, and M.Fleury. 1985. “Role of Peripheral Vision in the Directional Control of Rapid Aiming Movements.” Canadian Journal of Psychology39: 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard, C., J.Paillard, M.Fleury, L.Hay, and J.Laure. 1990. “Positional versus Directional Control Loops in Visuomotor Pointing. European.” Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology10: 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., and K.Davids. 1996. “Manipulating the informational contraints in one-handed catching: How generalisable is the specificity of learning hypothesis?” The British Psychological Society Sport and Exercise Psychology Section Newsletter5: 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Boot, W. R., A. F.Kramer, E.Becic, D. A.Wiegmann, and T.Kubose. 2006. “Detecting Transient Changes in Dynamic Displays: The More You Look, the Less You See.” Human Factors48: 759–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. G., R.Chua, D.Elliott, and D.Goodman. 1990. “The Contribution of Vision to Asymmetries in Manual Aiming.” Neuropsychologica28: 1215–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-H., and C.-H.Yeh. 2010. “Human Performance Interfaces in Air Traffic Control.” Applied Ergonomics41 (1): 123–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappe, D., K.-P. L.Vu, and T.Strybel. 2012. “Situation Awareness in the NextGen Air Traffic Management System.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction28 (2): 140–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conversy, S., H. Gaspard-Boulinc, S. Chatty, S. Valès, C. Dupré, and C. Ollagnon. 2011. “Supporting Air Traffic Control Collaboration with a TableTop System.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, China.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrel, C., D.Leifflen, J. P.Orliaguet, and Y.Coello. 2000. “Pointing Movement Visually Controlled through a Video Display: Adaptation to Scale Change.” Ergonomics43: 461–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, D. W., U.So, E.Burdet, and M.Kawato. 2007. “Visual Feedback is Not Necessary for the Learning of Novel Dynamics.” PloS One2 (12): e1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodale, M. A., D.Pelisson, and C.Prablanc. 1986. “Large Adjustments in Visually Guided Reaching do Not Depend on Vision of the Hand or Perception of Target Displacement.” Nature320: 748–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurter, C., R. Lesbordes, C. Letondal, J.-L. Vinot, and S. Conversy. 2012. “Strip'TIC: Exploring Augmented Paper Strips for Air Traffic Controllers.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Capri Island (Naples), Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., D.Elliott, J.Coull, R.Chua, and J.Lyons. 2002. “Optimal Control Strategies under Different Feedback Schedules: Kinematic Evidence.” Journal of Motor Behavior34: 45–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., and I. M.Franks. 2000. “The Effect of Practice on Component Submovements is Dependent on Visual Feedback.” Journal of Motor Behavior32: 227–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafond, D., F.Vachon, R.Rousseau, and S.Tremblay. 2010. “A Cognitive and Holistic Approach to Developing Metrics for Decision Support in Command and Control.” In Advances in Cognitive Ergonomics, edited by D. B.Kaber and G.Boy, 65–73. Danvers, MA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Letondal, C., C. Hurter, R. Lesbordes, J.-L. Vinot, and S. Conversy. 2013. “Flights in My Hands: Coherence Concerns in Designing Strip'tic, a Tangible Space for Air Traffic Controllers.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, A. C., W. A.Rogers, and A. D.Fisk. 2009. “Using Direct and Indirect Input Devices: Attention Demands and Age-related Differences.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)16 (1): 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertz, C., S. Chatty, and J.-L. Vinot. 2000. “Pushing the Limits of ATC User Interface Design beyond S&M Interaction: The DigiStrips Experience.” Paper presented at the Proceeding of ATM'2000 R&D Seminar, Napoli, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Parise, R., J.-P. Imbert, F. Marais, and R. Alonso. 2012. ”LABY: Un support d'aide à l'évaluation de choix de conception d'IHM pour le contrôle aérien.” Paper presented at the ErgoIHM 2012, Biarritz, France.
   Google Scholar
• Prablanc, C., D.Pelisson, and M. A.Goodale. 1986. “Visual Control of Reaching Movements without Vision of the Limb. I. Role of Retinal Feedback of Target Position in Guiding the Hand.” Experimental Brain Research62: 293–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevot, T., J. R.Homola, L. H.Martin, J. S.Mercer, and C. D.Cabrall. 2012. “Toward Automated Air Traffic Control – Investigating a Fundamental Paradigm Shift in Human/Systems Interaction.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction28 (2): 77–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proteau, L.1992. “On the Specificity of Learning and the Role of Visual Information for Movement Control.” In Vision and Motor Control, edited by L.Proteau and D.Elliott, 67–103. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Proteau, L., R. G.Marteniuk, Y.Girouard, and C.Dugas. 1987. “On the Type of Information used to Control and Learn an Aiming Movement after Moderate and Extensive Training.” Human Movement Science6: 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J., A. M.Pejtersen, and L. P.Goodstein. 1994. Cognitive Systems Engineering. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, J. A., and D. C.Knill. 2005. “Humans Use Continuous Visual Feedback from the Hand to Control Both the Direction and Distance of Pointing Movements.” Experimental Brain Research162 (4): 458–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., and R.Bjork. 1992. “New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training.” Psychological Science3: 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénécal, S., P.-M. Léger, M. Fredette, F. Courtemanche, A.-F. Cameron, M. Seyedmohammadmahdi, A. Paquet, and R. Riedl. 2013. “Touch Screen as Input Device: Does it Influence Memory Retrieval?” Proceedings of the Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milan 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Vachon, F., B. R.Vallières, D. M.Jones, and S.Tremblay. 2012. “Nonexplicit Change Detection in Complex Dynamic Settings: What Eye Movements Reveal.” Human Factors54: 996–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beers, R. J., D. M.Wolpert, and P.Haggard. 2002. “When Feeling is More Important than Seeing in Sensorimotor Adaptation.” Current Biology12 (10): 834–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rossum, J. H. A.1990. “Schmidt's Schema Theory: The Empirical Base of the Variability of Practice Hypothesis.” Human Movement Science9: 387–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varakin, D., D. T.Levin, and R.Fidler. 2004. “Unseen and Unaware: Implications of Recent Research on Failures of Visual Awareness for Human-Computer Interface Design.” Human-Computer Interaction19: 389–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield, D., R.Ball, and J.Bird. 1983. “Some Comparisons of On-Display and Off-Display Touch Input Devices for Interaction with Computer Generated Displays.” Ergonomics26 (11): 1033–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, K., C. Müller-Tomfelde, K. Cheng, and I. Wechsung. 2012. “Does Proprioception Guide Back-of-Device Pointing as well as Vision?” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, TX, USA.
   Google Scholar