The effects of display size on performance

References

• Alluisi, E. A.1955. Measured Visual Acuity as a Function of Phenomenal Size (USAF: WADC TR. Technical Report No. 55-384.)Washington, DC: United States Air Force.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, H. R.1946. “Contrast Thresholds of the Human Eye.” Journal of the Optical Society of America36 (11): 624–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boff, K. R., L.Kaufman, and J. P.Thomas. 1986. Handbook of Perception and Performance: Volume I – Sensory Processes and Perception. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgeman, B., M. L.Lennon, and A.Jackenthal. 2003. “Effects of Screen Size, Screen Resolution, and Display Rate on Computer-Based Test Performance.” Applied Measurement in Education16 (3): 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chignell, M. H., and P. A.Hancock. 1986. “Integration of the Cognitive and PhysicalAspects of the Human-machine Interface.” Proceedings of the Human Factorsand Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting30 (10): 1007–1011.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, A. V.1959. “Optimal Interval Length for Visual Interpolation: The Effect of Viewing Distance.” Journal of Applied Psychology43 (2): 125–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosenzo, K. A., and S. C.Stafford. 2007. Usability Assessment of Displays for Dismounted Soldier Applications. Army Research Laboratories Publication No. ARL-TR-4326.Washington, DC: Army Research Labs.
   Google Scholar
• Czerwinski, M., G.Smith, T.Regan, B.Meyers, G.Robertson, and G.Starkweather. 2003. “Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays.” In Human–Computer Interaction '03. Paper presented at the ninth IFIP international conference on human–computer interaction, Zurich, Switzerland, edited by A.Rauterberg, M.Manozzi, and JWesson, 9–16. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Czerwinski, M., M. Tan, and G. Robertson. 2003. “Women take a Wider View.” CHI '02. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 195–201. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruijin, D. D., and H.Van Oostendorp. 1992. “The Influence of Screen Size and Text Layout on the Study of Text.” Behaviour and Information Technology11 (2): 71–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degusta, M.2012. “Are Smart Phones Spreading Faster than Any Technology in Human History?” MIT Technology Review Business Impact1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, R. A., and C.McKnight. 1990. “The Effects of Display Size and Text Splitting on Reading Lengthy Text from Screen.” Behavior and Information Technology9 (3): 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvorine, I.1963. Dvorine Pseudo-Isochromatic Plates. 2nd ed.New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, W. R.1970. “The Stimulus and Information Processing.” American Psychologist25 (4): 350–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimbretière, F., M. Stone, and T. Winograd2001. “Fluid Interaction with High-Resolution Wall-Size Displays.” Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Orlando, FL, November 11–14, 21–30. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guliford, J. P., and W. S.Zimmerman. 1948. “The Guilford–Zimmerman Aptitude Survey.” Journal of Applied Psychology32 (1): 24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A.1996. “Effects of Control Order, Augmented Feedback, Input Device and Practice on Tracking Performance and Perceived Workload.” Ergonomics39 (2): 1146–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A.2009. “Performance on the Very Edge.” Military Psychology21 (1): S68–S74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., and J. K.Caird. 1993. “Experimental Evaluation of a Model of Mental Workload.” Human Factors35 (3): 413–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., M.Mouloua, and J. W.Senders. 2008. “On the Philosophical Foundations of Driving Distraction and the Distracted Driver.” In Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects and Mitigation, edited by M. A.Regan, J. D.Lee, and K. L.Young, 11–30. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., and J. S.Warm. 1989. “A Dynamic Model of Stress and Sustained Attention.” Human Factors31 (5): 519–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., J. L.Weaver, and R.Parasuraman. 2002. “Sans Subjectivity, Ergonomics is Engineering.” Ergonomics45 (14): 991–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, W. C., P. A.Hancock, and S. C.Harris. 2005. “Information Processing Changes Following Extended Stress.” Military Psychology17 (2): 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holoway, A. H., and E. G.Boring. 1941. “Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant.” American Journal of Psychology54 (1): 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hubel, D. H., and T. N.Wiesel. 2005. Brain and Visual Perception: The Story of a 25-Year Collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kabat, M. H., R. L.Kane, A. L.Jefferson, and R. K.Dipino. 2001. “Construct Validity of Selected Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) Battery Measures.” The Clinical Neuropsychologist15 (4): 498–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. L., and B. H.Kantowitz. 1976. “Speed-accuracy Tradeoff in Double Stimulation: II. Effects on the Second Response.” Memory & cognition4 (6): 690–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, B., and T. Starner. 2013. A Review of Head-Mounted Displays (HMD) Technologies and Applications forConsumer Electronics Proc. SPIE 8720: 87200A-1-87200A-13. https://doi.org/doi:10.1117/12.2015654.
   Google Scholar
• Lamar, E. S., S.Hecht, S.Shlaer, and C. D.Hendley. 1947. “Size, Shape, and Contrast in Detection of Targets by Daylight Vision I. Data and Analytical Description.” Journal of the Optical Society of America37 (7): 531–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. J., Y.Hsieh, H.Chen, and J. C.Chen. 1998. “Visual Performance and Fatigue in Reading Vibrating Numeric Displays.” Displays29: 386–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, T., D. A.Bowman, and J.Chen. 2006. “Increased Display Size and Resolution Improve Task Performance in Information-Rich Virtual Environments.” In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (GI '06, 139–146). Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Information Processing Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, T., G. S.Schmidt, O. G.Staadt, M. A.Livingston, R.Ball, and R.May. 2006. “A Survey of Large High-Resolution Display Technologies, Techniques, and Applications.” In Virtual Reality Conference, 223–236, IEEE, March.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A., and D. G.Bobrow. 1975. “On Data-Limited and Resource-Limited Processes.” Cognitive Psychology7: 44–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schhenkman, B. N.2003. “Appearance, Clarity, Acceptance and Beauty of Jagged Letters on Computer Screens.” Displays24: 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., T. D.Cook, and D. T.Campbell. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Szalma, J. L., T. N.Schmidt, G. L.Teo, and P. A.Hancock. 2014. “Vigilance on the Move: Video-Game Based Measurement of Sustained Attention.” Ergonomics. Forthcoming.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, D. S., D.Gergle, P.Scupelli, and R.Pausch. 2006. “Physically Large Displays Improve Performance on Spatial Tasks.” ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction13 (1): 71–99.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Armed Forces NRC Vision Committee. 1950. Standards to be Employed in Research on Visual Displays. Washington, DC: U.S. Armed Forces Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S.1938. Experimental Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, Y. Y., and C. D.Wickens. 1988. “Dissociation of Performance and Subjective Measures of Workload.” Human Factors30 (1): 111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar