Taiwanese adult foot shape classification using 3D scanning data

References

• Ashizawa, K., C.Kumakura, A.Kusumoto, and S.Narasaki. 1997. “Relative Foot Size and Shape to General Body Size in Javanese, Filipinas and Japanese with Special Reference to Habitual Footwear Types.” Annals of Human Biology24 (2): 117–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, W. C., S. H.Lee, W.Chu, T. J.Wang, and M. C.Lee. 1995. “The Use of Arch Index to Characterize Arch Height: A Digital Image Processing Approach.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering42: 1088–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNS 4800-S1093. 2000. Sizing System for Shoes. Taiwan: Taiwanese Industrial Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Dahle, L. K., M. J.Mueller, A.Delitto, and J. E.Diamond. 1991. “Visual Assessment of Foot Type and Relationship of Foot Type to Lower Extremity Injury.” The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy14 (1): 70–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonda, E., and K.Katayama. 2006. “Big Feet in Polynesia: A Somatometric Study of the Tongans.” Anthropological Science114 (22): 127–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goonetilleke, R. S., E. C. F.Ho, and R. H. Y.So. 1997. “Foot Anthropometry in Hong Kong.” In Proceedings of the ASEAN 97 Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Goonetilleke, R. S, and A.Luximon. 2001. “Designing for Comfort: A Footwear Application.” In Proceedings of Computer Aided Ergonomics & Safety Conference, Maui, Hawaii [CD-ROM].
   Google Scholar
• Hawes, M. R., D.Sovak, M.Miyashita, S. J.Kang, Y.Yoshihuku, and S.Tanaka. 1994. “Ethnic Differences in Forefoot Shape and the Determination of Shoe Comfort.” Ergonomics37 (1): 187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., L.Wang, D. Q.Xu, and J. X.Li. 2011. “Gender Differences in Foot Shape: A Study of Chinese Young Adults.” Sports Biomechanics10 (2): 85–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 7250. 2004. Basic Human Body Measurements for Technological Design. Geneva: International Standard Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Kadambande, S., A.Khurana, U.Debnath, M.Bansal, and K.Hariharan. 2006. “Comparative Anthropometric Analysis of Shod and Unshod Feet.” The Foot16: 188–191.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, I., S.Grau, M.Mauch, C.Maiwald, and T.Horstmann. 2008. “Sex-related Differences in Foot Shape.” Ergonomics51 (11): 1693–1709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, I., C.Langbein, T.Horstmann, and S.Grau. 2011. “Sex-related Differences in Foot Shape of Adult Caucasians: A Follow-up Study Focusing on Long and Short Feet.” Ergonomics54 (3): 294–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, I., and M.Mauch. 2012. “Foot Morphology.” In Science of Footwear, edited by Ravindra S.Goonetilleke. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J. M., and M. J. J.Wang. 2010. “The Evaluation of Scan-derived Anthropometric Measurements.” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement59 (8): 2048–2054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, G., V. L.Houston, M.Mussman, M.Garbarini, A. C.Beattie, and C.Thongpop. 2009. “Comparison of Male and Female Foot Shape.” Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association99 (5): 383–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luximon, A., R. S.Goonetilleke, and K. L.Tsui. 2003. “Foot Landmarking for Footwear Customization.” Ergonomics46 (6): 625–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochimaru, M., M.Kouchi, and M.Dohi. 2000. “Analysis of 3-D Human Foot Forms Using the Free form Deformation Method and its Application in Grading Shoe Lasts.” Ergonomics43 (9): 1301–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razeghi, M., and M. E.Batt. 2002. “Foot Type Classification: A Critical Review of Current Methods.” Gait & Posture15 (3): 282–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigo, A. S., R. S.Goonetilleke, and C. P.Witana. 2012. “Model Based Foot Shape Classification Using 2D Foot Outlines.” Computer-Aided Design44 (1): 48–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voracek, M., M. L.Fisher, B.Rupp, D.Lucas, and D. M.Fessler. 2007. “Sex Differences in Relative Foot Length and Perceived Attractiveness of Female Feet: Relationships Among Anthropometry, Physique, and Preference Ratings.” Perceptual and Motor Skills104 (1): 1123–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witana, C. P., K.Feng, and R. S.Goonetilleke. 2004. “Dimensional Differences for Evaluating the Quality of Footwear Fit.” Ergonomics47 (12): 1301–1317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, R. E., and P. R.Cavanagh. 2001. “Gender Differences in Adult Foot Shape: Implications for Shoe Design.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise33 (4): 605–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, S., S. R.Goonetilleke, C. P.Witana, T. W.Weerasinghe, and E. Y. L.Au. 2010. “Foot Arch Characterization: A Review, a New Metric, and a Comparison.” Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association100 (1): 14–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar