Tracking and discrete dual task performance with different spatial stimulus–response mappings

References

• Bayerl, J. P., D. R.Millen, and S. H.Lewis. 1988. “Consistent Layout of Function Keys and Screen Labels Speeds User Responses.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting32 (5): 344–346.
   Google Scholar
• Buchner, A., R.Bell, K.Rothermund, and D.Wentura. 2008. “Sound Source Location Modulates the Irrelevant-Sound Effect.” Memory & cognition36 (3): 617–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunton, K., and C.Keintz. 2008. “The Use of a Dual-Task Paradigm for Assessing Speech Intelligibility in Clients With Parkinson Disease.” Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology16 (3): 141–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan, K. W. L., and A. H. S.Chan. 2005. “Spatial S–R Compatibility of Visual and Auditory Signals: Implications for Human–Machine Interface Design.” Displays26 (3): 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. W. L., and A. H. S.Chan. 2009a. “Spatial Stimulus–Response (S–R) Compatibility for Foot Controls With Visual Displays.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics39 (2): 396–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. W. L., and A. H. S.Chan. 2009b. “Spatial Stimulus–Response (SR) Compatibility Effect for Hand Controls With Visual Signals on Horizontal Plane.” Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong1974–1976.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A. H. S., and K. W. L.Chan. 2010. “Three-Dimensional Spatial Stimulus–Response (S–R) Compatibility for Visual Signals With Hand and Foot Controls.” Applied Ergonomics41 (6): 840–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. W. L., and A. H. S.Chan. 2011a. “Spatial Stimulus Response Compatibility For A Horizontal Visual Display With Hand and Foot Controls.” Ergonomics54 (3): 233–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. W. L., and A. H. S.Chan. 2011b. “Spatial Stimulus–Response Compatibility For Hand and Foot Controls With Vertical Plane Visual Signals.” Displays32 (5): 237–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. J., D. L.Riddle, C. J. E.Puryear, C. J. R.Breeden, C. A. R.Ramirez, and M. D. S.Hall. 2012. “The Design and Evaluation of THATO: A Mobile Tactile Messaging System to Assist Dismounted Soldier Tactical Operations.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting2397–2401.
   Google Scholar
• Coren, S.1993. “The Lateral Preference Inventory for Measurement of Handedness, Footedness, Eyedness, and Earedness: Norms for Young Adults.” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society31 (1): 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinadis, N., and K. J.Vicente. 1999. “Designing Functional Visualizations for Aircraft Systems Status Displays.” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology9 (3): 241–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, T. K., and N. B.Sarter. 2008. “Cross-Modal Links Among Vision, Audition, and Touch in Complex Environments.” Human Factors50 (1): 17–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., and R. L.Deininger. 1954. “SR Compatibility: Correspondence Among Paired Elements Within Stimulus and Response Codes.” Journal of Experimental Psychology48 (6): 483–492.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., and C. M.Seeger. 1953. “SR Compatibility: Spatial Characteristics of Stimulus and Response Codes.” Journal of Experimental Psychology46 (3): 199–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guastello, S. J., H.Boeh, C.Shumaker, and M.Schimmels. 2012. “Catastrophe Models for Cognitive Workload and Fatigue.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science13 (5): 586–602.
   Google Scholar
• Gunzelmann, G., L.Richard MooreJr., D. D.Salvucci, and K. A.Gluck. 2011. “Sleep Loss and Driver Performance: Quantitative Predictions With Zero Free Parameters.” Cognitive Systems Research12 (2): 154–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., A.Kembbavi, and L. S.Davis. 2009. “Observing Human–Object Interactions: Using Spatial and Functional Compatibility for Recognition.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence31 (10): 1775–1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, W-D.1994. An Ecological Consideration of Stimulus–Response Compatibility. New York: Waxmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Heister, G., P.Schroeder-Heister, and W. H.Ehrenstein. 1990. “Spatail Coding and Spatio-Anatomical Mapping: Evidence for a Hierarchical Model of Spatial Stimulus–Response Compatibility.” In Stimulus–Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective, edited by R. W.Proctor and T. G.Reeve, 117–143. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C., H. Z.Tan, and C.Spence. 2006. “The Differential Effect of Vibrotactile and Auditory Cues on Visual Spatial Attention.” Ergonomics49 (7): 724–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey, G. R. J.1997. “Compensatory Control in the Regulation of Human Performance Under Stress and High Workload: A Cognitive-Energetical Framework.” Biological Psychology45 (1): 73–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole, G.2007. The Psychology of Driving. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., and B.Eglau. 2002. “Control of Stimulus–Response Translation in Dual-Task Performance.” Psychological Research66 (4): 260–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D.1973. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kempen, G., N.Olsthoorn, and S.Sprenger. 2012. “Grammatical Workspace Sharing During Language Production and Language Comprehension: Evidence from Grammatical Multitasking.” Language and Cognitive Processes27 (3): 345–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurienti, P. J., J. H.Burdette, J. A.Maldjian, and M. T.Wallace. 2006. “Enhanced Multisensory Integration in Older Adults.” Neurobiology of Aging27 (8): 1155–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., D. V.McGehee, T. L.Brown, and D.Marshall. 2006. “Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control and Alert Modality on Driver Performance.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1980 (1): 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., K. C.Barrett, and G. A.Morgan. 2005. SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, M. N., J.Cosman, J. D.Lee, S. P.Vecera, J. D.Dawson, and M.Rizzo. 2012. “Cross-Modal Warnings for Orienting Attention in Older Drivers with and Without Attention Impairments.” Applied Ergonomics43 (4): 768–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., and D.Ruan. 2000. “Comparative Study of Fuzzy Control PID Control, and Advanced Fuzzy Control for Simulating a Nuclear Reactor Operation.” International Journal of General System29 (2): 263–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and J.Jhuang. 2012. “Effects of In-Vehicle Warning Information Displays With or Without Spatial Compatibility on Driving Behaviors and Response Performance.” Applied Ergonomics43 (4): 679–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukopoulos, L. D., R. K.Dismukes, and I.Barshi. 2003. “Concurrent Task Demands in the Cockpit: Challenges and Vulnerabilities in Routine Flight Operations.” Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology737–742.
   Google Scholar
• Loukopoulos, L. D., R. K.Dismukes, and I.Barshi. 2009. The Multitasking Myth: Handling Complexity In Real-World Operations. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, S. A., C. D.Wickens, S. D.Prinet, N.Sarter, and A.Sebok. 2013. “Supporting Interruption Management and Multimodal Interface Design: Three Meta-Analyses of Task Performance as a Function of Interrupting Task Modality.” Human Factors55 (4): 697–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, D., and S.Isherwood. 2007. “Mapping Candidate Within-Vehicle Auditory Displays to Their Referents.” Human Factors49 (3): 417–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendenhall, W., R. J.Beaver, and M. B.Beaver. 2006. Introduction to Probability and Statistics. 12th ed.Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Minin, L., S.Benedetto, M.Pedrotti, A.Re, and F.Tesauri. 2012. “Measuring the Effects of Visual Demand on Lateral Deviation: A Comparison Among Driver's Performance Indicators.” Applied Ergonomics43 (3): 486–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, M., R.Winterberg, M. M.van Paassen, and M.Mulder. 2010. “Direct Manipulation Interfaces for In-Flight Four-Dimensional Navigation Planning.” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology20 (3): 249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., and K. L.Vu. 2006. Stimulus–Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, B., and B.Mehler. 2011. “The Impact of Cognitive Workload on Physiological Arousal in Young Adult Drivers: A Field Study and Simulation Validation.” Ergonomics54 (10): 932–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakurai, M., M.Ayama, and T.Kumagai. 2003. “Color Appearance in the Entire Visual Field: Color Zone Map Based on the Unique Hue Component.” Journal of the Optical Society of America A20 (11): 1997–2009.
   Google Scholar
• Salvucci, D. D., and N. A.Taatgen. 2008. “Threaded Cognition: An Integrated Theory of Concurrent Multitasking.” Psychological Review115 (1): 101–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scerra, V. E., and J. C.Brill. 2012. “Effect of Task Modality on Dual-Task Performance, Response Time, and Ratings of Operator Workload.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting1456–1460.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, E. A., M.Schrauf, M.Simon, A.Buchner, and W. E.Kincses. 2011. “The Short-Term Effect of Verbally Assessing Drivers' state on Vigilance Indices During Monotonous Daytime driving.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour14 (3): 251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweickert, R.1983. “Latency Network Theory: Scheduling of Processes in Sentence Verification and the Stroop Effect.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition9 (3): 353–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer, T. A., P.Jolicœur, M.Vogel-Sprott, and M. J.Dixon. 2004. “Fast, but Error-Prone, Responses During Acute Alcohol Intoxication: Effects of Stimulus–Response Mapping Complexity.” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research28 (4): 643–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, M. W., and J. H.Cauraugh. 1999. “Precision Hypothesis and the End-State Comfort Effect.” Acta Psychologica100 (3): 243–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnleitner, A., M.Simon, W. E.Kincses, A.Buchner, and M.Schrauf. 2012. “Alpha Spindles as Neurophysiological Correlates Indicating Attentional Shift in a Simulated Driving Task.” International Journal of Psychophysiology83 (1): 110–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, C., and C.Ho. 2008. “Multisensory Interface Design for Drivers: Past, Present and Future.” Ergonomics51 (1): 65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spironelli, C., M.Tagliabue, and C.Umiltá. 2009. “Response Selection and Attention Orienting: A Computational Model of Simon Effect Asymmetries.” Experimental Psychology56 (4): 274–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M. E., J. B. F.van Erp, A.Brouwer, B.Blankertz, and P.Werkhoven. 2012. “Control–Display Mapping in Brain–Computer Interfaces.” Ergonomics55 (5): 564–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umiltá, C., and R.Nicoletti. 1990. “Spatial Stimulus–Response Compatibility.” In Stimulus–Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective, edited by R. W.Proctor and T. G.Reeve, 89–116. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, K. L., and R. W.Proctor. 2001. “Determinants of Right–Left and Top–Bottom Prevalence for Two-Dimensional Spatial Compatibility.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27 (4): 813–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., P.David, J.Srivastava, S.Powers, C.Brady, J.D'Angelo, and J.Moreland. 2012. “Behavioral Performance and Visual Attention in Communication Multitasking: A Comparison Between Instant Messaging and Online Voice Chat.” Computers in Human Behavior28 (3): 968–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D.1984. “Processing resources in attention.” In Varieties of Attention, edited by R.Parasuraman and R.Davies, 63–101. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D.2002. “Multiple Resources and Performance Prediction.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science3 (2): 159–177.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D.2008. “Multiple Resources and Mental Workload.” Human Factors50 (3): 449–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., and Y.Liu. 1988. “Codes and Modalities in Multiple Resources: A Success and a Qualification.” Human Factors30 (5): 599–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., and Y.Liu. 2007. “Queuing Network Modeling of Driver Workload and Performance.” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems8 (3): 528–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., O.Tsimhoni, and Y.Liu. 2009. “Application of Scheduling Methods in Designing Multimodal In-Vehicle Systems.” SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars – Electronic and Electrical Systems1 (1): 202–210.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi, M., and R. W.Proctor. 2006. “Stimulus–Response Compatibility With Pure and Mixed Mappings in a Flight Task Environment.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied12 (4): 207–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi, M., and R. W.Proctor. 2010. “Compatibility of Motion Information in Two Aircraft Attitude Displays for a Tracking Task.” The American Journal of Psychology123 (1): 81–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar