Evaluating input device usability as a function of task difficulty in a tracking task

References

• Axe, D., and S. Olexa. 2008. War Bots: How US Military Robots Are Transforming War in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Future. Ann Arbor, MI: Nimble Books LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Billings, D. R., and P. J. Durlach. 2008. “The Effects of Input Device and Latency on Ability to Effectively Pilot a Simulated Micro-UAV.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 52 (27): 2092–2096. doi:10.1177/154193120805202702.
   Google Scholar
• Billings, D. R., and P. J. Durlach. 2010. Input Device Characteristics Contribute to Performance During Training to Operate a Simulated Micro-Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. (TR#1273). Arlington, VA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, J. P., and M. C. Dunn. 2000. “Behavioural Implications of Alarm Mistrust as a Function of Task Workload.” Ergonomics 43 (9): 1283–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. 1996. “SUS: A ‘Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale.” In Usability Evaluation in Industry, edited by P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, and A. L. McClelland, 189–194. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Comstock, J. R., Jr, and R. J. Arnegard. 1992. The Multi-Attribute Task Battery for Human Operator Workload and Strategic Behavior Research  (NASA TM-104174). Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense. 2009. FY2009-2034. Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap  (ADA522247). Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Durlach, P. J., J. L. Neumann, and D. R. Billings. 2008. Training to Operate a Simulated Micro-Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Continuous or Discrete Manual Control. (TR#1229). Arlington, VA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., and J. R. Peterson. 1964. “Information Capacity of Discrete Motor Responses.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (2): 103–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fong, T., and C. Thorpe. 2001. “Vehicle Teleoperation Interfaces.” Autonomous Robots 11 (1): 9–18. doi:10.1023/A:1011295826834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., M. Mouloua, R. Gilson, J. Szalma, and T. Oron-Gilad. 2007. “Provocation: Is the UAV Control Ratio the Right Question?” Ergonomics in Design 15 (1): 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., and L. E. Staveland. 1988. “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research.” Human Mental Workload 1: 139–183.
   Google Scholar
• Isokoski, P., and B. Martin. 2007. “Performance of Input Devices in FPS Target Acquisition.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE 2007), Salzburg, Austria, June.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. L., S. M. Rock, D. Burns, and S. Morris. 2002. “Autonomous Robots in SWAT Applications: Research, Design, and Operations Challenges.” Paper presented at the 2002 Symposium for the Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI '02), Orlando, FL, July.
   Google Scholar
• Klochek, C., and I. S. MacKenzie. 2006. “Performance Measures of Game Controllers in a Three-Dimensional Environment.” In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2006, 73–79. Canadian Information Processing Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, K. M., A. Chaparro, and B. S. Chaparro. 2008. “The Effect of Input Device on First-Person Shooter Target Acquisition.” Paper presented at the Fifty Second Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, New York, NY, September 52 (19): 1565–1569.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. 2011. “A Tutorial on a Practical Bayesian Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Testing.” Behavior Research Methods 43 (3): 679–690. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0126-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouloua, M., R. Gilson, and P. Hancock. 2003. “Human-Centered Design of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.” Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications 11 (1): 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Natapov, D., S. J. Castellucci, and I. S. MacKenzie. 2009. “ISO 9241-9 Evaluation of Video Game Controllers.” In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009, 223–230. Toronto: Canadian Information Processing Society.
   Google Scholar
• National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2011. “MATB-II Official Website.” Accessed from http://matb.larc.nasa.gov/overview.php.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., M. Mouloua, and R. Molloy. 1996. “Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38 (4): 665–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettitt, R. A., C. B. Carstens, and E. S. Redden. 2012. Scalability of Robotic Controllers: An Evaluation of Controller Options – Experiment III. (No. ARL-TR-5989). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Research Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Pettitt, R. A., E. S. Redden, and C. B. Carstens. 2008. Scalability of Robotic Controllers: An Evaluation of Controller Options. (No. ARL-TR-4457). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Research Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Pettitt, R. A., E. S. Redden, N. Fung, C. B. Carstens, and D. Baran. 2011. Scalability of Robotic Controllers: An Evaluation of Controller Options – Experiment II. (No. ARL-TR-5776). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Research Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Pettitt, R. A., E. S. Redden, E. Pacis, and C. B. Carstens. 2010. Scalability of Robotic Controllers: Effects of Progressive Levels of Autonomy on Robotic Reconnaissance Tasks. (No. ARL-TR-5258). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Research Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Rackliffe, N. 2005. “An Augmented Virtuality Display for Improving UAV Usability.” (ADA456335). Accessed from http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD = ADA456335.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago-Espada, Y., J. Myer, K. Latorella, and J. Comstock. 2011. “The Multi-Attribute Task Battery (MATB-II).” Software for Human Performance and Workload Research: A User's Guide. NASA/TM-2011-217164.
   Google Scholar
• Shively, R. J., C. Brasil, and S. R. Flaherty. 2007. “Alternative UAV Sensor Control: Leveraging Gaming Skill.” In Proceedings of International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Oklahoma City, OK: Wright State University.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, B. S., and C. H. Perala. 2007. Workload, Stress, and Situation Awareness of Soldiers Who are Controlling Unmanned Vehicles in Future Urban Operations. (No. ARL-TR-4071). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Research Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. M., D. P. Miller, and C. Ling. 2013. “Spatial Orientation Aware Smartphones for Tele-Operated Robot Control in Military Environments: A Usability Experiment.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57 (1): 2027–2031. doi:10.1177/1541931213571453.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J., K. Le, A. Deitermann, and E. Montague. 2014. “How Different Types of Users Develop Trust in Technology: A Qualitative Analysis of the Antecedents of Active and Passive User Trust in a Shared Technology.” Applied Ergonomics 45 (6): 1495–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar