Contrasting models of driver behaviour in emergencies using retrospective verbalisations and network analysis

References

• Bainbridge, L. 1999. “Verbal Reports as Evidence of the Process Operator's Knowledge.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 51 (2): 213–238. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1979.0307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, V. A., and N. A. Stanton. 2014. “Hands and Feet Free Driving: Ready or Not?” Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Part II 8: 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, V. A., N. A. Stanton, and C. Harvey. 2014a. “Sub-Systems on the Road to Vehicle Automation: Hands and Feet Free But Not ‘Mind’ Free Driving.” Safety Science 62: 505–514. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, V. A., N. A. Stanton, and C. Harvey. 2014b. “What the Drivers Do and Do Not Tell You: Using Verbal Protocol Analysis to Investigate Driver Behaviour in Emergency Situations.” Ergonomics 57 (3): 332–342. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.884245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benta, M. 2005. “Studying Communication Networks with AGNA 2.1.” Cognition Brain Behaviour 9: 567–574.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. 2012. “National Travel Survey 2012 Statistical Release.” Accessed September 17, 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-travel-survey-2012.
   Google Scholar
• de Waard, D., M. van der Hulst, M. Hoedemaeker, and K. A. Brookhuis. 1999. “Driver Behavior in an Emergency Situation in the Automated Highway System.” Transportation Human Factors 1 (1): 67–82. doi:10.1207/sthf0101_7.
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, J. E., and B. Mullen. 2005. “Social Network Analysis.” In Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, edited by N. A. Stanton, A. Hedge, K. Brookhuis, and E. Salas, 58.1–58.6. London: CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., and D. B. Kaber. 1999. “Level of Automation Effects on Performance, Situation Awareness and Workload in a Dynamic Control Task.” Ergonomics 42 (3): 462–492. doi:10.1080/001401399185595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., and H. A. Simon. 1993. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council for the European Union. 2009. Regulation (EC) No. 661/2009. Concerning Type-Approval Requirements for the General Safety of Motor Vehicles, Their Trailers and Systems, Components and Separate Technical Units Intended Therefore. European Parliament and the Council for the European Union. Accessed January 20, 2015. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/internal_market/single_market_for_goods/motor_vehicles/technical_implications_road_safety/mi0053_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, R. 2005. “Towards a General Theory of Driver Behaviour.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 37 (3): 461–472. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2004.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, K. A., L. M. Aitken, and C. Duffield. 2009. “A Comparison of Novice and Expert Nurses' Cue Collection During Clinical Decision-Making: Verbal Protocol Analysis.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 46 (10): 1335–1344. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E., A. Nabo, and I. V. Lau. 2004. “A Systemic Model for Driver-In Control.” In Proceedings of the Second International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Park City, Utah, July 21–24, 2003, 86–91.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, R. J., C. Baber, R. McMaster, N. A. Stanton, P. M. Salmon, R. Stewart, and G. H. Walker. 2006. “Command and Control in Emergency Services Operations: A Social Network Analysis.” Ergonomics 49 (12–13): 1204–1225. doi:10.1080/00140130600619528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., and S. Parkes. 2003. “Trends in the Use of Verbal Protocol Analysis in Software Engineering Research.” Behaviour and Information Technology 22 (2): 127–140. doi:10.1080/0144929031000081341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, D. P., P. M. Salmon, N. A. Stanton, G. H. Walker, and L. Rafferty. 2011. “What Could They Have Been Thinking? How Sociotechnical System Design Influences Cognition: A Case Study of the Stockwell Shooting.” Ergonomics 54 (2): 103–119. doi:10.1080/00140139.2010.539706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaber, D. B., and M. R. Endsley. 2004. “The Effects of Level of Automation and Adaptive Automation on Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Workload in a Dynamic Control Task.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5 (2): 113–153. doi:10.1080/1463922021000054335.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. A., R. Calderwood, and D. Macgregor. 1989. “Critical Decision Method for Eliciting Knowledge.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 19 (3): 462–472. doi:10.1109/21.31053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. F. 2012. “Driver Usage and Understanding of Adaptive Cruise Control.” Applied Ergonomics 43 (3): 501–506. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. W., J. Park, A. R. Kim, and P. H. Seong. 2012. “Measuring Situation Awareness of Operation Teams in NPPs Using a Verbal Protocol Analysis.” Annals of Nuclear Energy 43: 167–175. doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2011.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., and K. A. See. 2004. “Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46 (1): 50–80. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan, P., and D. A. Wiegmann. 2007. “Similarities and Differences Between Human–Human and Human–Automation Trust: An Integrative Review.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8 (4): 277–301. doi:10.1080/14639220500337708.
   Google Scholar
• McIlroy, R. C., N. A. Stanton, and B. Remington. 2012. “Developing Expertise in Military Communications Planning: Do Verbal Reports Change with Experience?” Behaviour and Information Technology 31 (6): 617–629. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2010.492239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michon, J. A. 1985. “A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do?” In Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, edited by L. Evans and R. C. Schwing, 485–520. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R. 2000. “Designing Automation for Human Use: Empirical Studies and Quantitative Models.” Ergonomics 43 (7): 931–951. doi:10.1080/001401300409125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., and V. Riley. 1997. “Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39 (2): 230–253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., T. B. Sheridan, and C. D. Wickens. 2000. “A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A, Systems and Humans: IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society 30 (3): 286–297. doi:10.1109/3468.844354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, K. L., and N. A. Stanton. 2014. “All for One and One for all: Representing Teams as a Collection of Individuals and an Individual Collective Using a Network Perceptual Cycle Approach.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 44 (5): 777–792. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2014.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, B., and C. M. Haslegrave. 2007. “Use of Concurrent and Retrospective Verbal Protocols to Investigate Workers' Thoughts During a Manual-Handling Task.” Applied Ergonomics 38 (2): 177–190. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2006.03.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. M., N. A. Stanton, G. H. Walker, and D. P. Jenkins. 2009. Distributed Situation Awareness: Advances in Theory, Measurement and Application to Teamwork. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A. 2014. “Representing Distributed Cognition in Complex Systems: How a Submarine Returns to Periscope Depth.” Ergonomics 57 (3): 403–418. doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.772244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., A. Dunoyer, and A. Leatherland. 2011. “Detection of New In-Path Targets by Drivers Using Stop and Go Adaptive Cruise Control.” Applied Ergonomics 42 (4): 592–601. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., and P. Marsden. 1996. “From Fly-By-Wire to Drive-By-Wire: Safety Implications of Automation in Vehicles.” Safety Science 24 (1): 35–49. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(96)00067-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., G. H. Walker, M. S. Young, T. Kazi, and P. M. Salmon. 2007. “Changing Drivers' Minds: The Evaluation of An Advanced Driver Coaching System.” Ergonomics 50 (8): 1209–1234. doi:10.1080/00140130701322592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., F. Paas, and J. J. G. van Merrienboer. 2008. “Effects of Studying Sequences of Process-Oriented and Product-Oriented Worked Examples on Troubleshooting Transfer Efficiency.” Learning and Instruction 18 (3): 211–222. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ratingen, M. 2012. “Fifteen Years for Safer Cars/AEB Fitment Survey.” In Proceedings of the 15th Anniversary Event on Avoid the Crash with Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems, Brussels, Belgium, June 13. Accessed January 20, 2015. http://www.amiando.com/FNPIBLY.html?page = 760000.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. H., N. A. Stanton, and P. M. Salmon. 2011. “Cognitive Compatibility of Motorcyclists and Car Drivers.” Accident Analysis and Prevention 43 (3): 878–888. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., and J. G. Holland. 2000. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 3rd Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, P., F. Paas, and J. J. G. van Merrienboer. 2008. “How to Optimize Learning from Animated Models: A Review of Guidelines Based on Cognitive Load.” Review of Educational Research 78 (3): 645–675. doi:10.3102/0034654308320320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. S., and N. A. Stanton. 2002. “Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: A New Explanation for the Effects of Mental Underload on Performance.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44 (3): 365–375. doi:10.1518/0018720024497709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar