A study of usability principles and interface design for mobile e-books

References

• Allison, W. H., and R. Kelly Rainer, Jr. 1992. “The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing.” Journal of Management Information System 9 (1): 93–111.
   Google Scholar
• André, C. 2000. Synchronous Interface Behavior: Syntax and Semantics. France: Sophia-Antipolis.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, A., R. Setchi, and A. Marsh. 2013. “Intuitive Interaction with Multifunctional Mobile Interfaces.” Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences 25 (2): 187–196. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2012.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Budiu, R., and J. Nielsen. 2010. “Ipad App and Website Usability.” In 1st Edition: Initial Findings Weeks after First iPad Launched, 98. Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group.
   Google Scholar
• Budiu, R., and J. Nielsen. 2011. “Ipad App and Website Usability.” In 2nd Edition: Research Findings a Year after Launch. 2nd ed., 121. USA: Nielsen Norman Group.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S.-S. 2004. Research Method. Taichung: Tsang Hai.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, N., F. Guimbretiere, M. Dixon, C. Lewis, and M. Agrawala. 2008. “Navigation Techniques for Dual-Display e-Book Readers.” Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Florence, Italy: ACM, 1779–1788.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.-W. 2012. A Design Study of Interface Representation and Editing Styles for e-Book Reader on Tablet PC. Taipei: National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Constantiou, I. D. 2009. “Consumer Behaviour in the Mobile Telecommunications' Market: The Individual's Adoption Decision of Innovative Services.” Telematics and Informatics 26 (3): 270–281. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2008.11.005.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 16 (3): 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, W. H., and M. Venkatesan. 1976. “Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer Behavior: A Review of the Evidence.” Journal of Marketing Research 13 (3): 303–308. doi:10.2307/3150746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-H., and C.-M. Wang. 2012. “The Impact of Interaction Pattern toward User Operation on Mobile Ebooks.” 2012 International Conference on Paradigm for Design Education, Taiwan: Yunlin.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., ed. 2012. Vogue Taiwan: The Warrior. Taipei: Condé Nast Digital.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Y.-Y., M.-J. J. Wang, and R. Lin. 2009. “Usability Evaluation of e-Books.” Displays 30 (2): 49–52. doi:10.1016/j.displa.2008.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B., M. Choi, and I. Han. 2009. “User Behaviors toward Mobile Data Services: The Role of Perceived Fee and Prior Experience.” Expert Systems with Applications 36 (4): 8528–8536. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, M.-C., ed. 2012. GQ Taiwan: Next Big Hit. Taipei: Condé Nast Digital.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, S. 2012. Wired Editor-in-Chief Chris Anderson: Future of Reading, WIRED.TW. Accessed February 13, 2013. http://wired.tw/2012/02/13/future_of_reading_chris_anderson/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, S.-F., ed. 2011. Elle Taiwan: Love in Paris. Taipei: Hearst Magazines.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 2002. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J., Y. Rogers, and H. Sharp. 2002. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., H. Sharp, and J. Preece. 2011. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. 3rd ed. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Saffer, D. 2006. Designing for Interaction: Creating Smart Applications and Clever Devices. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. A. 1955. “Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding.” Public Opinion Quarterly 19 (3): 321–325. doi:10.1086/266577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirley, T., and T. Peter. 1995. “Assessing It Usage: The Role of Prior Experience.” MIS Quarterly 19 (4): 561–570. doi:10.2307/249633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B., and C. Plaisant. 2004. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Tajika, T., T. Yonezawa, and N. Mitsunaga. 2008. “Intuitive Page-Turning Interface of e-Books on Flexible e-Paper Based on User Studies.” Proceeding of the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: ACM, 793–796.
   Google Scholar
• Tidwell, J. 2006. Designing Interfaces. 2nd ed. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C., and L.-Y. Chia. 2012. SPSS Statistical Analysis Complete Study Manual. Taipei: TopTeam Information.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D., H. Zhang, R. Liu, W. Lv, and D. Wang. 2014. “T-Test Feature Selection Approach Based on Term Frequency for Text Categorization.” Pattern Recognition Letters 45 (0): 1–10. doi:10.1145/2396761.2398457.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, C.-J. 2010. The Principles of Interaction Design in the Post-Digital Age. Taipei: ARTIST-MAGAZINE.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J., ed. 2010. “Wired Magazine: Wired Free Preview.” New York, NY: Condé Nast.
   Google Scholar