Circular displays: control/display arrangements and stereotype strength with eight different display locations

References

• Burgess-Limerick, R., V. Krupenia, G. Wallis, A. Pratim-Bannerjee, and L. Steiner. 2010. “Directional Control–Response Relationships for Mining Equipment.” Ergonomics 53 (6): 748–757. doi:10.1080/00140131003675109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess-Limerick, R., C. M. Zupanc, and G. Wallis. 2012. “Directional Control–Response Compatibility of Joystick Steered Shuttle Cars.” Ergonomics 55 (10): 1278–1283. doi:10.1080/00140139.2012.700328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, W. H., and A. H. S. Chan. 2003. “Movement Compatibility for Rotary Control and Circular Display (Computer Simulated Test and Real Hardware Test.” Applied Ergonomics 34 (1): 61–71. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00075-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, W. H., and A. H. S. Chan. 2006. “Movement Compatibility for Circular Display and Rotary Controls Positioned at Peculiar Positions.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36 (8): 737–745. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2006.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, W. H., and A. H. S. Chan. 2007. “Strength and Reversibility of Movement Stereotypes for Lever Control and Circular Display.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37 (3): 233–244. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2006.10.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, A. H. S., A. J. Courtney, and K. W. Y. So. 2000. “Circular Displays With Thumbwheels: Hong Kong Chinese Preferences.” International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 10 (4): 453–463. doi:10.1002/1520-6564(200023)10:4>453:AID-HFM6>3.0.CO;2-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, A. H. S., and E. R. Hoffmann. 2010. “Movement Compatibility for Frontal Controls with Displays Located in Four Cardinal Orientations.” Ergonomics 53 (12): 1403–1419. doi:10.1080/00140139.2010.527018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, A. H. S., and E. R. Hoffmann. 2012. “Movement Compatibility for Configurations of Displays Located in Three Cardinal Orientations and Ipsilateral, Contralateral and Overhead Controls.” Applied Ergonomics 43 (1): 128–140. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, A. H. S., and E. R. Hoffmann. 2015. “Effect of Display Location on Control-Display Stereotype Strength for Translational and Rotational Controls with Linear Displays.” . Paper to appear in Ergonomics.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, R., D. J. Weeks, K. L. Ricker, and P. Poon. 2001. “Influence of Operator Orientation on Relative Organizational Mapping and Spatial Compatibility.” Ergonomics 44 (8): 751–765. doi:10.1080/00140130117522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, E. R. 1997. “Strength of Component Principles Determining Direction of Turn Stereotypes – Linear Displays with Rotary Controls.” Ergonomics 40 (2): 199–222. doi:10.1080/001401397188305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, E. R., and A. H. S. Chan. 2013. “The Worringham and Beringer ‘Visual Field’ Principle for Rotary Controls.” Ergonomics 56 (10): 1620–1624. doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.821173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata, A., and M. Moriwaka. 2007. “Applicability of Location Compatibility to the Arrangement of Display and Control in Human–Vehicle Systems: Comparison Between Young and Older Adults.” Ergonomics 50 (1): 99–111. doi:10.1080/00140130600987172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petropoulos, H., and J. Brebner. 1981. “Stereotypes for Direction of Movement of Rotary Controls Associated with Linear Displays: The Effects of Scale Presence and Position, of Pointer Direction, and Distances Between the Control and the Display.” Ergonomics 24 (2): 143–151. doi:10.1080/00140138108924839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, L., R. Burgess-Limerick, and W. Porter. 2014. “Directional Control–Response Compatibility Relationships Assessed by Physical Simulation of an Underground Bolting-Machine.” Human Factors 56 (2): 384–391. doi:10.1177/0018720813490953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., J. W. Keller, and R. L. Small. 2010. “Left. No, Right! Development of the Frame of Reference Transformation Tool (FORT).”, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting September 2010 54, pp. 1022–1026.
   Google Scholar
• Worringham, C. J., and D. B. Beringer. 1989. “Operator Orientation and Compatibility in Visual-Motor Task Performance.” Ergonomics 32 (4): 387–399. doi:10.1080/00140138908966105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worringham, C. J., and D. B. Beringer. 1998. “Directional Stimulus–Response Compatibility: A Test of Three Alternative Principles.” Ergonomics 41 (6): 864–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401398186694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupanc, C. M., R. J. Burgess-Limerick, and G. Wallis. 2007. “Performance Consequences of Alternating Directional Control–Response Compatibility: Evidence from a Coal Mine Shuttle Car Simulator.” Human Factors 49 (4): 628–636. doi:10.1518/001872007X215700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar