A Method of Applying Flight Data to Evaluate Landing Operation Performance

References

• Boeing. 2017. Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents, Worldwide Operations, 1959–2016. Seattle, WA: Boeing Commercial Airplanes.
   Google Scholar
• Boy, G. A. 2014. “From Automation to Tangible Interactive Objects.” Annual Reviews in Control 38 (1): 1–5788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civil Aviation Administration of China. 2012. Implementation and Management of Flight Operation Quality Assurance. Advisory Circular: 121/135-FS-2012-45.CAAC, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbatson, M., D. Harris, J. Huddlestone, and R. Sears. 2008. “Combining Control Input with Flight Path Data to Evaluate Pilot Performance in Transport Aircraft.” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 79 (11): 1061–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ebbatson, M., D. Harris, J. Huddlestone, and R. Sears. 2010. “The Relationship between Manual Handling Performance and Recent Flying Experience in Air Transport Pilots.” Ergonomics 53 (2): 268–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanis, G., A. Jennings, and P. Beckett. 2001. “Runway Width Effects in the Visual Approach to Landing.” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 11 (3): 281–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosslight, J. H., H. J. Fletcher, B. Masterton, and R. Hagen. 1978. “Monocular Vision and Landing Performance in General Aviation Pilots: Cyclops Revisited.” Human Factors 20 (1): 27–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. 2011. Human Performance on the Flight Deck. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, D. R. 2005. “Measurement of Hazardous Attitudes among Pilots.” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 15 (1): 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Air Transport Association (IATA). 2015. Loss of Control in-Flight Accident Analysis Report, 2010–2014. 1st ed. Montreal: International Air Transport Association.
   Google Scholar
• International Civil Aviation Organization. 2005. ICAO Annex 8: Airworthiness of Aircraft.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S., and D. Harris. 2010. “Development of Bespoke Human Factors Taxonomy for Gliding Accident Analysis and Its Revelations about Highly Inexperienced UK Glider Pilots.” Ergonomics 53 (2): 294–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, M., X. Q. You, J. J. Lan, and S. Y. Yang. 2011. “The Impact of Risk Tolerance, Risk Perception and Hazardous Attitude on Safety Operation among Airline Pilots in China.” Safety Science 49 (10): 1412–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorg, O. E., and S. Suzuki. 2010. “Modeling of the Visual Approach to Landing Using Neural Networks and Fuzzy Supervisory Control.” Aerospace Science and Technology 14 (2): 118–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, B. D. 2004. “Flight Deck Design and Integration for Commercial Air Transports.” In Human Factors for Civil Flight Deck Design, edited by D. Harris, 3–32. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Khatwa, R., and R. L. Helmreich. 1999. “Analysis of Critical Factors during Approach and Landing in Accidents and Normal Flight.” Flight Safety Digest 17–18: 1–256.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland, I. D. L., R. E. Caves, I. M. Humphreys, and D. E. Pitfield. 2004. “An Improved Methodology for Assessing Risk in Aircraft Operations at Airports, Applied to Runway Overruns.” Safety Science 42 (10): 891–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland, I., R. E. Caves, M. Hirst, and D. E. Pitfield. 2003. “The Normalisation of Aircraft Overrun Accident Data.” Journal of Air Transport Management 9 (6): 333–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W. C., D. Harris, and C. S. Yu. 2008. “Routes to Failure: Analysis of 41 Civil Aviation Accidents from the Republic of China Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 40 (2): 426–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmisano, S., S. Favelle, and W. L. Sachtler. 2008. “Effects of Scenery, Lighting, Glideslope, and Experience on Timing the Landing Flare.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14 (3): 236–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmisano, S., and B. Gillam. 2005. “Visual Perception of Touchdown Point during Simulated Landing.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11 (1): 19–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, M., X. Shao, and H. Chi. 2011. “Flight Operations Risk Diagnosis Method on Quick Access Record Exceedance.” Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics 37 (10): 1207–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, M. A. V., G. C. Fernando, L. M. Gordún, and F. J. S. Nieto. 2011. “The Development of Probabilistic Models to Estimate Accident Risk (Due to Runway Overrun and Landing Undershoot) Applicable to the Design and Construction of Runway Safety Areas.” Safety Science 49 (5): 633–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shappell, S., C. Detwiler, K. Holcomb, C. Hackworth, A. Boquet, and D. Wiegmann. 2007. “Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents: An Analysis Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System.”Human Factors 49 (2): 227–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., P. Salmon, D. Harris, A. Marshall, J. Demagalski, M. S. Young, T. Waldmann, and S. Dekker. 2009. “Predicting Pilot Error: Testing a New Methodology and a Multi-Methods and Analysts Approach.” Applied Ergonomics 40 (3): 464–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, R., and W. Han. 2011. “Analysis on Parameters Characteristics of Flight Exceedance Events Based on Distinction Test.” Chinese Journal of Safety Science and Technology 7 (2): 22–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Y. Ren, and C. X. Wu. 2018. “Effects of Flare Operation on Landing Safety: A Study Based on ANOVA of Real Flight Data.” Safety Science 102: 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., R. S. Sun, C. X. Wu, Z. X. Cui, and Z. Lu. 2014. “A Flight QAR Data Based Model for Hard Landing Risk Quantitative Evaluation.” China Safety Science Journal 24 (2): 88–92.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., C. Wu, and R. Sun. 2013. “Pilot operating characteristics analysis of long landing based on flight QAR data.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8020, 157–66.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., C. Wu, and R. Sun. 2014. “An Analysis of Flight Quick Access Recorder (QAR) Data and Its Applications in Preventing Landing Incidents.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 127: 86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Y. Ren, H. Sun, and C. Dong. 2017. “A Landing Operation Performance Evaluation System Based on Flight Data, Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Cognition and Design, EPCE.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10276: 297–305.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., and J. G. Hollands. 2000. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Press.
   Google Scholar