867
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The impact of external facial features on the construction of facial composites

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 575-592 | Received 19 Jul 2018, Accepted 01 Dec 2018, Published online: 04 Feb 2019

References

  • Andrews, T. J., and P. Thompson. 2010. “Face-to-Face Coalition.” i-Perception 1 (1): 28–30.
  • Badham, S. P., K. A. Wade, H. J. E. Watts, N. G. Woods, and E. A. Maylor. 2013. “Replicating Distinctive Facial Features in Lineups: Identification Performance in Young versus Older Adults.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20: 289–295. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0339-2.
  • Ballinger, G. A. 2004. “Using Generalized Estimating Equations for Longitudinal Data Analysis.” Organizational Research Methods 7 (2): 127–150. doi:10.1177/1094428104263672.
  • Baudouin, J. Y., and G. W. Humphreys. 2006. “Configural Information in Gender Categorisation.” Perception 35 (4): 531–540. doi:10.1068/p3403.
  • Bonner, L., A. M. Burton, and V. Bruce. 2003. “Getting to Know You: how to Learn New Faces.” Visual Cognition 10 (5): 527–536. doi:10.1080/13506280244000168.
  • Bruce, V., Z. Henderson, K. Greenwood, P. Hancock, A. M. Burton, and P. Miller. 1999. “Verification of Face Identities from Images Captured on Video.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 5 (4): 339–360. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339.
  • Bruce, V., and A. Young. 1998. In the Eye of the Beholder: The Science of Face Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Calder, A. J., A. W. Young, J. Keane, and M. Dean. 2000. “Configural Information in Facial Expression Perception.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26: 527–551. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.26.2.527.
  • Carbon, C. C. 2008. “Famous Faces as Icons. The Illusion of Being an Expert in the Recognition of Famous Faces.” Perception 37 (5): 801–806.
  • Chan, J. P. K., and J. D. Ryan. 2012. “Holistic Representations of Internal and External Face Features Are Used to Support Recognition.” Frontiers in Psychology 87: 1–10.
  • Chiller-Glaus, S. D., A. Schwaninger, and F. Hofer. 2007. “Identity Verification from Photographs in Travel Documents: The Role of Display Duration and Orientation on Performance.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 51 (19): 1327–1330.
  • Clutterbuck, R., and R. A. Johnston. 2002. “Exploring Levels of Face Familiarity by Using an Indirect Face-Matching Measure.” Perception 31 (8): 985–994.
  • Cutler, B. L., S. D. Penrod, and T. K. Martens. 1987. “The Reliability of Eyewitness Identifications: The Role of System and Estimator Variables.” Law and Human Behavior, 11: 223–258.
  • Davies, G. M., and A. Milne. 1982. “Recognizing Faces in and out of Context.” Current Psychology 2 (1–3): 235–246. doi:10.1007/BF02684516.
  • Diamond, R., and S. Cary. 1986. “Why Faces, Are and Are Not Special: An Effect of Expertise.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 11: 107–117. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.2.107.
  • Ellis, H. D. 1986. “Face Recall: A Psychological Perspective.” Human Learning 5: 1–8.
  • Ellis, H. D., G. M. Davies, and J. W. Shepherd. 1978. “A Critical Examination of the Photofit System for Recalling Faces.” Ergonomics 21 (4): 297–307. doi:10.1080/00140137808931726.
  • Ellis, H. D., J. W. Shepherd, and G. M. Davies. 1979. “Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition.” Perception 8 (4): 431–439. doi:10.1068/p080431.
  • Endo, M., K. Takahashi, and K. Maruyama. 1984. “Effects of Observer’s Attitude on the Familiarity of Faces: Using the Difference in Cue Value Between Central and Peripheral Facial Elements as an Index of Familiarity.” Tohoku Psychologica Folia 43: 23–34.
  • Farell-Roig, E. 2018. “Fifth Man Charged in Connection with Death of Simon Clark in Pendine Appears in Court.” Wales Online. Retrieved from www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/fifth-man-charged-connection-death-15352247 on 3rd November 2018.
  • Fodarella, C., H. Kuivaniemi-Smith, J. Gawrylowicz, and C. D. Frowd. 2015. “Forensic Procedures for Facial-Composite Construction.” The Journal of Forensic Practice 17 (4): 259–270. doi:10.1108/JFP-10-2014-0033.
  • Frowd, C. D., V. Bruce, A. McIntyre, and P. J. B. Hancock. 2007. “The Relative Importance of External and Internal Features of Facial Composites.” British Journal of Psychology 98 (1): 61–77. doi:10.1348/000712606X104481.
  • Frowd, C. D., V. Bruce, H. Ness, L. Bowie, C. Thomson-Bogner, J. Paterson, A. McIntyre, and P. J. B. Hancock. 2007. “Parallel Approaches to Composite Production.” Ergonomics 50 (4): 562–585. doi:10.1080/00140130601154855.
  • Frowd, C. D., V. Bruce, Y. Plenderleith, and P. J. B. Hancock. 2006. “Improving Target Identification using Pairs of Composite Faces Constructed by the Same Person.” Institution of engineering and technology conference on crime and security, London, pp. 386–395.
  • Frowd, C. D., V. Bruce, D. Ross, A. McIntyre, and P. J. B. Hancock. 2007. “An Application of Caricature: how to Improve the Recognition of Facial Composites.” Visual Cognition 15: 1–31.
  • Frowd, C. D., V. Bruce, A. Smith, and P. J. B. Hancock. 2008. “Improving the Quality of Facial Composites Using a Holistic Cognitive Interview.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14: 276–287. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.276.
  • Frowd, C. D., D. Carson, H. Ness, D. McQuiston, J. Richardson, H. Baldwin, and P. J. B. Hancock. 2005. “Contemporary Composite Techniques: The Impact of a Forensically-relevant Target Delay.” Legal and Criminological Psychology 10: 63–81. doi:10.1348/135532504X15358.
  • Frowd, C. D., W. B. Erickson, J. M. Lampinen, F. C. Skelton, A. H. McIntyre, and P. J. Hancock. 2015. “A Decade of Evolving Composites: Regression-and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Forensic Practice 17 (4): 319–334.
  • Frowd, C. D., P. J. B. Hancock, V. Bruce, F. C. Skelton, C. J. Atherton, L. Nelson, and Sendrea G. 2011. “Catching More Offenders with EvoFIT Facial Composites: Lab Research and Police Field Trials.” Global Journal of Human-Social Science 11 (3): 35–46.
  • Frowd, C. D., and G. Hepton. 2009. “The Benefit of Hair for the Construction of Facial Composite Images.” The British Journal of Forensic Practice 11 (4): 15–25. doi:10.1108/14636646200900025.
  • Frowd, C. D., M. Pitchford, F. C. Skelton, A. Petkovic, C. Prosser, and B. Coates. 2012. “Catching Even More Offenders with EvoFIT Facial Composites.” In IEEE Proceedings of 2012 Third International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies, edited by A. Stoica, D. Zarzhitsky, G. Howells, C. Frowd, K. McDonald-Maier, A. Erdogan, and T. Arslan, 20–26. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE. doi:10.1109/EST.2012.26
  • Frowd, C. D., F. Skelton, C. Atherton, M. Pitchford, G. Hepton, L. Holden, A. McIntyre, and P. J. B. Hancock. 2012. “Recovering Faces from Memory: The Distracting Influence of External Facial Features.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18: 224–238. doi:10.1037/a0027393.
  • Frowd, C. D., F. C. Skelton, N. Butt, A. Hassan, S. Fields, and P. J. B. Hancock. 2011. “Familiarity Effects in the Construction of Facial-composite Images Using Modern Software Systems.” Ergonomics 54 (12): 1147–1158. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.623328.
  • Frowd, C. D., F. Skelton, G. Hepton, L. Holden, S. Minahil, M. Pitchford, A. McIntyre, C. Brown, and P. J. B. Hancock. 2013. “Whole-face Procedures for Recovering Facial Images from Memory.” Science & Justice 53 (2): 89–97.
  • Geiselman, R. E., R. P. Fisher, D. P. MacKinnon, and H. L. Holland. 1986. “Eyewitness Memory Enhancement with the Cognitive Interview.” American Journal of Psychology 99 (3): 385–401. doi:10.2307/1422492.
  • Gibson, S. J., C. J. Solomon, M. I. S. Maylin, and C. Clark. 2009. “New Methodology in Facial Composite Construction: from Theory to Practice.” International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics 2 (2): 156–168. doi:10.1504/IJESDF.2009.024900.
  • Henderson, Z., V. Bruce, and A. M. Burton. 2001. “Matching the Faces of Robbers Captured on Video.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 15 (4): 445–464. doi:10.1002/acp.718.
  • Hole, G. J. 1994. “Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces.” Perception 23 (1): 65–74.
  • Lee, E. S., and T. E. Whalen. 1996. “Feature Approaches to Suspect Identification: The Effect of Multiple Raters on System Performance.” Ergonomics 39 (1): 17–34. doi:10.1080/00140139608964430.
  • Lee, E., T. Whalen, J. Sakalauskas, G. Baigent, C. Bisesar, A. McCarthy, G. Reid, and C. Wotton. 2004. “Suspect Identification by Facial Features.” Ergonomics 47 (7): 719–747.
  • Li, Y., N. Vishwamitra, H. Hu, B. Knijnenburg, and K. Caine. 2017. “Effectiveness and Users’ Experience of Face Blurring as a Privacy Protection for Sharing Photos via Online Social Networks.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 61 (1): 803–807. doi:10.1177/1541931213601694.
  • Maurer, D., R. Le Grand, and C. J. Mondloch. 2002. “The Many Faces of Configural Processing.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (6): 255–260.
  • McIntyre, A., C. D. Frowd, V. Bruce, and P. J. B. Hancock. 2010. “Looking at People Who Are Wearing Glasses: The Impact of Glasses on Matching Photographs of Unfamiliar Faces and Recognizing Familiar Composite Faces.” In 2010 IEEE international Conference on Emerging Security Technologies, edited by G. Howells, K. Sirlantzis, A. Stoica, T. Huntsberger and A.T. Arslan, 36–43. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE. ISBN 978-0-7695-4175-4
  • O’Donnell, C., and V. Bruce. 2001. “Familiarisation with Faces Selectively Enhances Sensitivity to Changes Made to the Eyes.” Perception 30 (6): 755–764.
  • Patterson, K. E., and A. D. Baddeley. 1977. “When Recognition Fails.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory 3: 406–417. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.3.4.406.
  • Righi, G., J. J. Peissig, and M. J. Tarr. 2012. “Recognizing Disguised Faces.” Visual Cognition 20 (2): 143–169. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.654624.
  • Roberts, T., and V. Bruce. 1988. “Feature Saliency in Judging the Sex and Familiarity of Faces.” Perception 17 (4): 475–481.
  • Sadr, J., I. Jarudi, and P. Sinha. 2003. “The Role of Eyebrows in Face Recognition.” Perception 32 (3): 285–293.
  • Shepherd, J. W., G. M. Davies, and H. D. Ellis. 1981. Studies of cue saliency. In Perceiving and Remembering Faces, edited by G. M. Davies, H. D. Ellis, J. W. Shepherd, 105–132). London: Academic Press.
  • Sinha, P., and T. Poggio. 1996. “I Think I Know That Face.” Nature 384 (6608): 404.
  • Sinha, P., and T. Poggio. 2002. “‘United’ we stand.” Perception 31 (1): 133.
  • Skelton, F. C., C. D. Frowd, and K. Speers. 2015. “The Benefit of Context for Facial-Composite Construction.” The Journal of Forensic Practice 17 (4): 281–290. doi:10.1108/JFP-08-2014-0022.
  • Tanaka, J. W., and M. J. Farah. 1993. “Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 46A: 225–245. doi:10.1080/14640749308401045.
  • Tanaka, J. W., and J. A. Sengco. 1997. “Features and Their Configuration in Face recognition.” Memory & Cognition 25 (5): 583–592.
  • Tredoux, C. G., D. T. Nunez, O. Oxtoby, and B. Prag. 2006. “An Evaluation of ID: An Eigenface Based Construction System.” South African Computer Journal 37: 1–9.
  • Tulving, E., and D. M. Thomson. 1973. “Encoding Specificity and Retrieval Processes in Episodic Memory.” Psychological Review 80 (5): 352–373. doi:10.1037/h0020071.
  • Wogalter, M. S. 1996. “Describing Faces from Memory: Accuracy and Effects on Subsequent Recognition Performance.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40 (11): 536–540. doi:10.1177/154193129604001103.
  • Yarmey, A. D. 2004. “Eyewitness Recall and Photo Identification: a Field Experiment.” Psychology, Crime & Law 10: 53–68. doi:10.1080/1068316021000058379.
  • Yasuda, T. 2005. “Effects of Configural Information on Face Shape Perception.” Japanese Journal of Psychology 76 (2): 131–138.
  • Young, A. W., D. C. Hay, K. H. McWeeny, B. M. Flude, and A. W. Ellis. 1985. “Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External Features.” Perception 14 (6): 737–746.
  • Young, A. W., D. Hellawell, and D. C. Hay. 1987. “Configurational Information in Face Perception.” Perception 16 (6): 747–759. doi:10.1068/p160747.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.