Expert evaluation of traffic signs: conventional vs. alternative designs

References

• Al-Madani, H., and A. R. Al-Janahi. 2002. “Role of Drivers’ Personal Characteristics in Understanding Traffic Sign Symbols.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 34 (2): 185–196. ‏ doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00012-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Bassat, T. 2013. “The effect of context and ergonomic design of traffic signs on driver comprehension–a preliminary evaluation.” In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. Vol. 57. No. 1. Los Angeles, CA, USA: SAGE Publications.‏ doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571434
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Bassat, T. 2015. “Israeli and american traffic signs – similarities, differences and compliance with ergonomic principles of signs design.” Paper presented at Automobile 2015 Conference, Valencia, Spain, September 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Bassat, T., and D. Shinar. 2006. “Ergonomic Guidelines for Traffic Sign Design Increase Sign Comprehension.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48 (1): 182–195. doi:10.1518/001872006776412298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Bassat, T., and D. Shinar. 2015. “The Effect of Context and Drivers’ Age on Highway Traffic Signs Comprehension.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 33: 117–127. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choocharukul, K., and K. Sriroongvikrai. 2017. “Road Safety Awareness and Comprehension of Road Signs from International Tourist’s Perspectives: A Case Study of Thailand.” Transportation Research Procedia 25: 4518–4528. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Dewar, R. E., D. W. Kline, and H. Allen Swanson. 1994. “Age Differences in Comprehension of Traffic Sign Symbols.” Transportation Research Record 1456: 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Dissanayake, S., and J. J. Lu. 2001. “Traffic Control Device Comprehension: Differences between Domestic and International Drivers in USA.” IATSS Research 25 (2): 80–87.‏ doi:10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60072-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. A., A. Negassa, M. D. Edwardes, and J. E. Forrester. 2003. “Statistical Analysis of Correlated Data Using Generalized Estimating Equations: An Orientation.” American Journal of Epidemiology 157 (4): 364–375. doi:10.1093/aje/kwf215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, J. W., and J. M. Hilbe. 2013. Generalized Estimating Equations. 2nd edition. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC. URL: https://content.taylorfrancis.com/books/download?dac=C2009-0-07051-7&isbn=9781420035285&format=googlePreviewPdf
   Google Scholar
• Jamson, S., and M. Mrozek. 2017. “Is Three the Magic Number? The Role of Ergonomic Principles in Cross Country Comprehension of Road Traffic Signs.” Ergonomics 60 (7): 1024–1031.‏ doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1245874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. 2010. “An Analysis of Road Signage and Advertising from a Pragmatic Visual Communication Perspective: Case Study of the M1 Motorway between the Gold Coast and Brisbane.” Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety 21 (2): 55. ‏Retrieved friom https://epublications.bond.edu.au/hss_pubs/373/
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A. W. Y., and A. H. S. Chan. 2007. “The Guessability of Traffic Signs: Effects of Prospective-user Factors and Sign Design Features.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 39 (6): 1245–1257.‏ doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A. W. Y., and A. H. S. Chan. 2008. “The Effects of Driver Factors and Sign Design Features on the Comprehensibility of Traffic Signs.” Journal of Safety Research 39 (3): 321–328. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2008.02.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, G. 2010. “Likert Scales, levels of Measurement and the ‘laws‘ of Statistics.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 15 (5): 625–632.‏ doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou, Y.-K., and Y.-C. Liu. 2012. “Effects of Sign Design Features and Training on Comprehension of Traffic Signs in Taiwanese and Vietnamese User Groups.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 42 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca, J., B. Insa, and P. Tejero. 2018. “Legibility of Text and Pictograms in Variable Message Signs: Can Single-word Messages Outperform Pictograms?” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60 (3): 384–396. doi:10.1177/0018720817751623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinar, D., R. E. Dewar, H. Summala, and L. Zakowska. 2003. “Traffic Sign Symbol Comprehension: A Cross-cultural Study.” Ergonomics 46 (15): 1549–1565. doi:10.1080/0014013032000121615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinar, D., and M. Vogelzang. 2013. “Comprehension of Traffic Signs with Symbolic versus Text Displays.” Transportation Research Part F: traffic Psychology and Behaviour 18: 72–82. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taamneh, M., and S. Alkheder. 2018. “Traffic Sign Perception among Jordanian Drivers: An Evaluation Study.” Transport Policy 66: 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations 2007. Convention on Road Signs and Signals of 1968: European Agreement Supplementing the Convention and Protocol on Road Markings, Additional to the European Agreement (2006 consolidated versions).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. 2014. “Generalized Estimating Equations in Longitudinal Data Analysis: A Review and Recent Developments.” Advances in Statistics 2014: 1. doi:10.1155/2014/303728.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., and A. H. S. Chan. 2013. “Traffic Sign Comprehension: A Review of Influential Factors and Future Directions for Research.” In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. Vol.2. Hong Kong, China: International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists.‏
   Google Scholar