Location choices of face-to-face interactions in academic buildings: an experience sampling approach

References

• Allen, T. J., and G. W. Henn. 2007. “The Organization and Architecture of Innovation- Managing the Flow of Technology.” Elsevier 53. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
   Google Scholar
• Appel-Meulenbroek, R. 2014. “How to measure added value of corporate real estate and building design. Knowledge sharing in research building.” Diss, Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Appel-Meulenbroek, R., P. Groenen, and I. Janssen. 2011. “An End User’s Perspective on Activity Based Office Concepts.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate 13(2): 122–135. doi:10.1108/14630011111136830.
   Google Scholar
• Appel-Meulenbroek, R., B. D. de Vries, and M. Weggeman. 2017. “Knowledge Sharing Behavior: The Role of Spatial Design in Buildings.” Environment and Behavior 49(8): 874–903. doi:10.1177/0013916516673405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babapour, M. C., and L. Rolfö. 2019. “Policies in Activity-Based Flexible Offices -‘I Am Sloppy with Clean-Desking. We Don’t Really Know the Rules.’” Ergonomics 62(1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1516805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y. 2000. “Teleworking: Benefits and Pitfalls as Perceived by Professionals and Managers.” New Technology, Work and Employment 15(1): 34–49. doi:10.1111/1468-005X.00063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berends, H., H. Van Der Bij, K. Debackere, and M. Weggeman. 2006. “Knowledge Sharing Mechanisms in Industrial Research.” R and D Management 36(1): 85–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00417.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R. 2003. “Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological37: 837–855. doi:10.1016/s0191-2615(02)00090-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijl, D. 2007. “Het Nieuwe Werken.” Academic Service : 21–139. doi:10.1007/978-90-313-7687-2_2.
   Google Scholar
• Bontekoning, A.C. 2007. “Generaties in Organisaties.” Doctoral diss., Labyrint Publications, 215.
   Google Scholar
• Boutellier, R., F. Ullman, J. Schreiber, and R. Naef. 2008. “Impact of Office Layout on Communication in a Science-Driven Business.” R&D Management 38(4): 372–391. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00524.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. G. 2008. “Proximity and Collaboration: Measuring Workplace Configuration.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate 10(1): 5–26. doi:10.1108/14630010810881630.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, A. E., J. E. Bono, and R. K. Purvanova. 2016. “Flourishing via Workplace Relationships: Moving beyond Instrumental Support.” Academy of Management Journal 59(4): 1199–1223. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., D. Hislop, and S. Cartwright. 2016. “Social Support in the Workplace Between Teleworkers, Office‐Based Colleagues and Supervisors.” New Technology, Work and Employment 31(2): 161–175. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, E., and I. Bruce. 2002. “Innovation, Knowledge Management and the Use of Space: Questioning Assumptions about Non-Traditional Office Work.” Journal of Information Science 28(3): 225–230. doi:10.1177/0165551024234110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. C., D. J. Leach, and C. W. Clegg. 2011. “The Physical Environment of the Office: Contemporary and Emerging Issues.” In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 26, edited by G. P. Hodgkinson and J. K. Ford. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119992592.ch6.
   Google Scholar
• De Croon, E., J. Sluiter, P.P. Kuijer, and M. Frings-Dresen. 2005. “The Effect of Office Concepts on Worker Health and Performance: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Ergonomics 48(2): 119–134. doi:10.1080/00140130512331319409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dul, J., and C. Ceylan. 2011. “Work Environments for Employee Creativity.” Ergonomics 54(1): 12–20. doi:10.1080/00140139.2010.542833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, H. A. 2003. “Building a Workplace of Choice: Using the Work Environment to Attract and Retain Top Talent.” Journal of Facilities Management 2(3): 244–257. doi:10.1108/14725960410808230.
   Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., M. A. Lyles, and E. W. Tsang. 2008. “Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects.” Journal of Management Studies 45: 677–690. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelen, L., J. Chau, S. Young, M. Mackey, D. Jeyapalan, and A. Bauman. 2019. “Is Activity-Based Working Impacting Health, Work Performance and Perceptions? A Systematic Review.” Building Research & Information 47(4): 468–479. doi:10.1080/09613218.2018.1440958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. D., and M. L. To. 2012. “Using Experience Sampling Methodology in Organizational Behavior.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 33(7): 865–877. doi:10.1002/job.1803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdenitsch, C., T. E. Scheel, J. Andorfer, and C. Korunka. 2016. “Coworking Spaces: A Source of Social Support for Independent Professionals.” Frontiers in Psychology 7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göçer, O., K. Göçer, E. E. Karahan, and I. I. Oygür. 2018. “Exploring Mobility & Workplace Choice in a Flexible Office through Post-Occupancy Evaluation.” Ergonomics 61(2): 226–242. doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1349937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgievski, M. J., T. J. M. Van der Voordt, S. G. A. Van Herpen, and S. Van Akkeren. 2010. “After the Fire: New Ways of Working in an Academic Setting.” Facilities 28(3/4): 206–224. doi:10.1108/02632771011023159.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D., P. J. Rentfrow, and W. B. Jr. Swann. 2003. “A Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Personality Domains.” Journal of Research in Personality 37(6): 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, C., and J. Myerson. 2011. “Space for Thought: Designing for Knowledge Workers.” Facilities 29(1/2): 19–30. doi:10.1108/02632771111101304.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, B., L. Suckley, and N. Nunnington. 2017. “Workplace Productivity and Office Type.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate 19(2): 111–138. doi:10.1108/JCRE-11-2016-0037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinzen, M., E. Cacciatori, F. A. Zoller, and R. Boutellier. 2018. “Who talks to whom about what? How interdisciplinary communication and knowledge of expertise distribution improve in integrated R&D labs.” Ergonomics 61(8): 1139–1153. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1449254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, B. P. 2011. “The Impact of Generational Differences on the Workplace.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate 13(2): 98–108. doi:10.1108/14630011111136812.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., and W. H. Greene. 2003. “The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice.” Transportation 30(2): 133–176. doi:10.1023/A:1022558715350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, Y., V. Loftness, J. H. Heerwagen, and K. M. Powell. 2011. “Relationship between Workplace Spatial Settings and Occupant-Perceived Support for Collaboration.” Environment and Behavior 43(6): 807–826. doi:10.1177/0013916510364465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ipe, M. 2003. “Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework.” Human Resource Development Review 2(4): 337–359. doi:10.1177/1534484303257985.
   Google Scholar
• Kaarlela-Tuomaala, A., R. Helenius, E. Keskinen, and V. Hongisto. 2009. “Effects of Acoustic Environment on Work in Private Office Rooms and Open-Plan Offices- Longitudinal Study during Relocation.” Ergonomics 52(11): 1423–1444. doi:10.1080/00140130903154579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabo, F. 2017. “A Model of Potential Encounters in the Workplace: The Relationships of Homophily, Spatial Distance, Organizational Structure, and Perceived Networks.” Environment and Behavior 49(6): 638–662. doi:10.1177/0013916516658501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabo, F., Y. Hwang, M. Levenstein, and J. Owen-Smith. 2015. “Shared Paths to the Lab: A Sociospatial Network Analysis of Collaboration.” Environment and Behavior 47(1): 57–84. doi:10.1177/0013916513493909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, D., and J. Steen. 2012. “Analysis of Strongly Programmed Workplace Environments; Architectural Configuration and Time-Space Properties of Hospital Work.” Proceedings of the 8th Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile, Chile, January 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., K. J. Petersen, P. D. Cousins, and R. B. Handfield. 2009. “Knowledge Sharing in Interorganizational Product Development Teams: The Effect of Formal and Informal Socialization Mechanisms.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 26(2): 156–172. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00343.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S., and L. Holdsworth. 2003. “The Psychological Impact of Teleworking: Stress, Emotions and Health.” New Technology, Work and Employment 18(3): 196–211. doi:10.1111/1468-005X.00121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marouf, L. N. 2007. “Social Networks and Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Case Study.” Journal of Knowledge Management 11(6): 110–125. doi:10.1108/13673270710832208.
   Google Scholar
• Mcfadden, D., and K. Train. 2000. “Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 15(5): 447–470. doi:10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:53.3.co;2-t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Kane, P., M. Palmer, and O. Hargie. 2007. “Worplace Interactions and the Polymorphic Role of e-Mail.” Leadership & Organization Development Journal 28(4): 308–324. doi:10.1108/01437730710752193.
   Google Scholar
• Oseland, N. A. 2013. “Personality and Preferences for Interaction, Occasional Paper WPU-OP-03.” Berkhamsted: Workplace Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Pangil, F., and A. M. Nadurdin. 2008. “Demographic factors and knowledge sharing behavior among R&D Employees”, Knowledge Management International Conference, 128–133, Langkawi.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, J., S. Austin, and M. Landsdale. 2006. Research Environments for Higher Education. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Peponis, J., S. Bafna, R. Bajaj, J. Bromberg, C. Congdon, M. Rashid, S. Warmels, Y. Zhang, and C. Zimring. 2007. “Designing Space to Support Knowledge Work.” Environment and Behavior 39(6): 815–840. doi:10.1177/0013916506297216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, P., T. De Bruijn, A. Bakker, and B. B. Van der Heijden. 2011. “Plezier in het nieuwe werken?” Accessed November 10 2017. http://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/95376/95376.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pinder, J., J. Parkin, S. Austin, F. Duggan, M. Lansdale, P. Demian, T. Baguley, and S. Allenby. 2009. “The Case for New Academic Workspaces.” Accessed January 2 2019. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/6037
   Google Scholar
• Puybaraud, M., S. Russel, A. M. McEwan, E. Luessink, and L. Beck. 2010. Generation Y and the Workplace Annual Report 2010. London, UK: Johnson Controls, Haworth and IDEA.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, M., J. Wineman, and C. Zimring. 2009. “Space, Behavior, and Environmental Perception in Open-Plan Offices: A Prospective Study.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36(3): 432–449. doi:10.1068/b33034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, M., K. Kampschroer, J. Wineman, and C. Zimring. 2006. “Spatial Layout and Face-to-Face Interaction in Offices: A Study of the Mechanisms of Spatial Effects on Face-to-Face Interaction.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33(6): 825–844. doi:10.1068/b31123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., and S. L. Gable. 2000. “Event-Sampling and Other Methods for Studying Everyday Experience.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, H. T. Reis and C. M. Judd, 190–222. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfö, L., J. Eklund, and H. Jahncke. 2018. “Perceptions of Performance and Satisfaction after Relocation to an Activity-Based Office.” Ergonomics 61(5): 644–657. doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1398844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothe, P., A-L. Lindholm, A. Hyvönen, and S. Nenonen. 2012. “Work Environment Preferences – Does Age Make a Difference?” Facilities 30(1/2): 78–95. doi:10.1108/02632771211194284.
   Google Scholar
• Rothe, P., N. Gersberg, and S. Nenonen. 2007. Usability Attributes of Business Parks. Proceedings from 6th EuroFM Research Symposium, EFMC, Zürich, June 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, Christie N., Chu Kim-Prieto, and Ed Diener. 2003. “Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strengths and Weaknesses.” Journal of Happiness Studies 4(1): 5–34. doi:10.1023/A:1023605205115.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., and R. A. Bruce. 1994. “Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace.” Academy of Management Journal 37: 580–607. doi:10.2307/256701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staplehurst, J., and G. Ragsdell. 2010. “Knowledge Sharing in SMEs: A Comparison of Two Case Study Organisations.” Journal of Knowledge Management Practice 11(1): 1–16. doi:10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0101.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, J. B., M. D. Santoro, and G. F. Farris. 2012. “Creating Collaboration Opportunity: Designing the Physical Workplace to Promote High-Tech Team Communication.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 59(4): 609–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toker, U., and D. O. Gray. 2008. “Innovation Spaces: Workspace Planning and Innovation in U.S. University Research Centers.” Research Policy 37(2): 309–329. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschan, F., N. K. Semmer, and L. Inversin. 2004. “Work Related and “Private’’ Social Interactions at Work.” Social Indicators Research 67(1/2): 145–182. doi:10.1023/B:SOCI.0000007338.60393.bf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uy, M. A., M. Foo, and H. Aguinis. 2010. “Using Experience Sampling Methodology to Advance Entrepreneurship Theory and Research.” Organizational Research Methods 13(1): 31–54. doi:10.1177/1094428109334977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Voordt, T. J. M., and W. Van der Klooster. 2008. “Post-occupancy Evaluation of a New Office in an Educational Setting.” CIB report 315, Proceedings of the CIB-W070 Conference in Facilities Management, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, June 16–18, 579–588.
   Google Scholar
• Weijs-Perrée, M., H. A. J. A. Appel-Meulenbroek, and T. Arentze. 2018. “Location Type Choice for Face-to-Face Interactions in Business Centers.” Environment and Behavior : 1–34. doi:10.1177/0013916518819715.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. G. 2018. “Impact of Work Environment on Academic Staff Job Performance: Case of a Uganda University.” International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics 4(4): 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Wineman, J. D., F. W. Kabo, and G. F. Davis. 2009. “Spatial and Social Networks in Organizational Innovation.” Environment and Behavior 41(3): 427–442. doi:10.1177/0013916508314854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlers, C., and G. Hertel. 2017. “Choosing Where to Work at Work- towards a Theoretical Model of Benefits and Risks of Activity-Based Flexible Offices.” Ergonomics 60(4): 467–486. doi: 0.1080/00140139.2016.1188220 doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1188220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, K., A. Akalin-Baskaya, and M. Celebi. 2007. “The Effects of Window Proximity, Partition Height, and Gender on Perceptions of Open-Plan Offices.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 27(2): 154–165. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahn, G. L. 1991. “Face-to-face communication in an office setting: The effects of position, proximity, and exposure.” Communications Research 18: 737–754. doi:10.1177/009365091018006002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zengyu Huang, V., A. Nandialath, A. K. Alsayaghi, and E. E. Karadeniz. 2013. “Socio-demographic factors and network configuration among MENA entrepreneurs.” International Journal of Emerging Markets 8: 258–281. doi:10.1108/17468801311330329.
   Google Scholar