Human–robot interaction: how worker influence in task allocation improves autonomy

References

• Abdallah, S., and V. R. Lesser. 2005. “Modeling Task Allocation Using a Decision Theoretic Model.” In Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, edited by M. Pechoucek, D. Steiner, and S. Thompson, 719–726. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, S. L. 1977. “A Taxonomy of Decision Support Systems.” Sloan Management Review 19 (1): 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum Consultants. n.d. “ERA Wissen: Was muss ich bei der Eingruppierung beachten?” [Salary Blanket Agreement (ERA) knowledge: What to consider in classification?]. https://www.era-entgeltrahmenabkommen.info/era-wissen/was-muss-ich-bei-der-eingruppierung-beachten/
   Google Scholar
• Arbeitsschutzgesetz. 1996. [German Occupational Safety and Health Act], August 7.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, J. H., and S. E. Maxwell. 1985. “Multivariate Analysis of Variance.” In Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Vol. 54. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bröhl, C., J. Nelles, C. Brandl, A. Mertens, and C. M. Schlick. 2016. “Tam Reloaded: A Technology Acceptance Model for Human-Robot Cooperation in Production Systems.” In HCI International 2016 – Posters' Extended Abstracts. HCI 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, edited by C. Stephanidis, vol. 617, 97–103. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Challenger, R., C. W. Clegg, and C. Shepherd. 2013. “Function Allocation in Complex Systems: Refraiming an Old Problem.” Ergonomics 56 (7): 1051–1069. doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.790482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., X. Mao, F. Hou, Q. Wang, and S. Yang. 2016. “Combining Re-Allocating and Re-Scheduling for Dynamic Multi-Robot Task Allocation.” In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). Manhattan, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A. 2001. “On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (3): 386–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., A. B. Bakker, F. Nachreiner, and W. B. Schaufeli. 2001. “The Job Demands-Resources Model of Burnout.” Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (3): 499–512. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F.,. E. Erdfelder, A.-G. Lang, and A. Buchner. 2007. “G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods 39 (2): 175–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: (and Sex and Drugs and Rock ‘N’ Roll). 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. 1951. Human Engineering for an Effective Air-Navigation and Traffic-Control System. Washington, DC. National Research Council, Division of Anthropology and Psychology, Committee on Aviation Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Gombolay, M. C., R. A. Gutierrez, S. G. Clarke, G. F. Sturla, and J. A. Shah. 2015. “Decision-Making Authority, Team Efficiency and Human Worker Satisfaction in Mixed Human–Robot Teams.” Autonomous Robots 39 (3): 293–312. doi:10.1007/s10514-015-9457-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, L., M.-P. Pacaux-Lemoine, and P. Millot. 2017. “Adaptation of the Level of Automation According to the Type of Cooperative Partner.” In Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 864–869. Manhattan, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, W., and P. Sachse. 2014. Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie: Psychische Regulation Von Tätigkeiten [Work Psychology: Psychological Regualtion of Tasks]. 3rd ed. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., and G. R. Oldham. 1976. “Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 (2): 250–279. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., D. R. Billings, K. E. Schaefer, J. Y. C. Chen, E. J. de Visser, and R. Parasuraman. 2011. “A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction.” Human Factors 53 (5): 517–527. doi:10.1177/0018720811417254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2019. PROCESS macro for SPSS and SAS (Version 3.4) [Computer software]. www.processmacro.org/download.html
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., T. R. Shaw, and D. S. Staples. 2004. “Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams.” Information Systems Research 15 (3): 250–267. doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, J.-Y., A. M. Bisantz, C. G. Drury, and J. Llinas. 2000. “Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems.” International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4 (1): 53–71. doi:10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. J., and D. Goldstein. 2003. “Medicine. Do Defaults save Lives?” Science 302 (5649): 1338–1339. doi:10.1126/science.1091721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaber, D. B., and J. M. Riley. 1999. “Adaptive Automation of a Dynamic Control Task Based on Secondary Task Workload Measurement.” International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 3 (3): 169–187. doi:10.1207/s15327566ijce0303_1.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., and F. Kirschner. 2012. “Mental Effort.” In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, edited by N. M. Seel, 2182–2184. New York, NY: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Klaer, V., and B. Wibranek. 2020. “Human Decisions for Robot Integration: Task Allocation in a Plan Based Building Assignment.” In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, edited by T. Belpaeme, J. Young, H. Gunes, and L. Riek, 296–298. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P. 2007. The Handbook of Psychological Testing. 2nd ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M., P. Goodwin, and P. Fildes. 2002. “Influence of User Participation on DSS Use and Decision Accuracy.” Omega 30 (5): 381–392. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00048-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, G. S. 1980. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Emotion.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edite by L. Berkowitz, 139–207. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, G. W., B. Streicher, E. Jonas, and R. Woschée. 2007. “Gerechtigkeitseinschätzungen in Organisationen.” Diagnostica 53 (2): 97–108. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.53.2.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsatsinis, N., and P. Delias. 2003. “Implementing an Agent-Based Decision Support System for Task Allocation: A Multi-Criteria Approach.” Paper presented at the 9th Panhellenic Conference in Informatics - PCI 2003, Thessaloniki, Greece, November 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Mcknight, D. H., M. Carter, J. B. Thatcher, and P. F. Clay. 2011. “Trust in a Specific Technology: An Investigation of Its Components and Measures.” ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 2 (2): 1–25. doi:10.1145/1985347.1985353.
   Google Scholar
• McShane, B. B., D. Gal, A. Gelman, C. Robert, and J. L. Tackett. 2019. “Abandon Statistical Significance.” The American Statistician 73 (1): 235–245. doi:10.1080/00031305.2018.1527253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moniz, A., and B.-J. Krings. 2016. “Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry.” Societies 6 (3): 23. doi:10.3390/soc6030023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., and S. E. Humphrey. 2006. “The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and Validating a Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and the Nature of Work.” Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (6): 1321–1339. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., L. Heuveline, E. Avril, and J. Cegarra. 2018. “Influence of Human-Machine Interactions and Task Demand on Automation Selection and Use.” Ergonomics 61 (12): 1601–1612. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1501517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomura, T., T. Kanda, T. Suzuki, and K. Kato. 2008. “Prediction of Human Behavior in Human-Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes toward Robots.” IEEE Transactions on Robotics 24 (2): 442–451. doi:10.1109/TRO.2007.914004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Older, M. T., P. E. Waterson, and C. W. Clegg. 1997. “A Critical Assessment of Task Allocation Methods and Their Applicability.” Ergonomics 40 (2): 151–171. doi:10.1080/001401397188279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onnasch, L., X. Maier, and T. Jürgensohn. 2016. “Mensch-Roboter-Interaktion - Eine Taxonomie Für Alle Anwendungsfälle (Baua: Fokus).” Dortmund. Bundesanstalt Für Arbeitsschutz Und Arbeitsmedizin doi:10.21934/baua:fokus20160630.
   Google Scholar
• Onnasch, L., C. D. Wickens, H. Li, and D. Manzey. 2014. “Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation: An Integrated Meta-Analysis.” Human Factors 56 (3): 476–488. doi:10.1177/0018720813501549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., T. B. Sheridan, and C. D. Wickens. 2000. “A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 30 (3): 286–297. doi:10.1109/3468.844354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, D. J. 2002. Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Resources for Managers. Westport, CT: Ouorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett, A. R., S. Y. Kim, and K. M. Feigh. 2014. “Measuring Human-Automation Function Allocation.” Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 8 (1): 52–77. doi:10.1177/1555343413490166.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., and A. Chavaillaz. 2018. “How Operators Make Use of Wide-Choice Adaptable Automation: Observations from a Series of Experimental Studies.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 19 (2): 135–155. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2017.1297866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B. 2018. “Comments on “Issues in Human–Automation Interaction Modeling: Presumptive Aspects of Frameworks of Types and Levels of Automation” by David B. Kaber.” Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 12 (1): 25–28. doi:10.1177/1555343417724964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth, J. 2019. “J3016 Automated-Driving Graphic Update.” SAE Standards News. https://www.sae.org/news/2019/01/sae-updates-j3016-automated-driving-graphic
   Google Scholar
• Stegmann, Sebastian, Rolf van Dick, Johannes Ullrich, Julie Charalambous, Birgit Menzel, Nikolai Egold, and Tina Tai-Chi Wu. 2010. “Der Work Design Questionnaire.” Zeitschrift Für Arbeits- Und Organisationspsychologie A&O 54 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1026/0932-4089/a000002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausch, A., and A. Kluge. 2020. “The Best Task Allocation Process is to Decide on One’s Own: Effects of the Allocation Agent in Human–Robot Interaction on Perceived Work Characteristics and Satisfaction.” Cognition, Technology & Work. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10111-020-00656-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausch, A., A. Kluge, and L. Adolph. 2020. “Psychological Effects of the Allocation Process in Human–Robot Interaction – a Model for Research on Ad Hoc Task Allocation.” Frontiers in Psychology 11: 564672. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J. W., and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Trentesaux, D., R. Dindeleux, and C. Tahon. 1998. “A Multicriteria Decision Support System for Dynamic Task Allocation in a Distributed Production Activity Control Structure.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 11 (1): 3–17. doi:10.1080/095119298130930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Universal Robots. n.d. e-Series von Universal Robots. München: Universal Robots.
   Google Scholar
• Universal Robots. 2021. “Universal Robots e-Series.” https://www.universal-robots.com/de/e-series/
   Google Scholar
• You, S., and L. P. Robert, Jr. 2019. “Trusting Robots in Teams: Examining the Impacts of Trusting Robots on Team Performance and Satisfaction.” Paper presented at the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Grand Wailea, HI, January 8–11.
   Google Scholar