‘There’s good and bad’: parent perspectives on the influence of mobile touch screen device use on prenatal attachment

References

• Alzhrani, A. M., J. R. Johnstone, E. A. H. Winkler, G. N. Healy, and M. M. Cook. Forthcoming. “Using Touchscreen Mobile Devices – When, Where and How: A One-Week Field Study.” Ergonomics. doi:10.1080/00140139.2021.1973577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2017. “Household Use of Information Technology, Australia, 2016-17. (No. 8146.0).” http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/8146.0Main+Features12016-17?OpenDocument
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, D., K. C. H. Parker, and C. H. Zeanah. 1997. “Mothers' Representations of Their Infants Assessed Prenatally: Stability and Association with Infants' Attachment Classifications.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 38 (3): 307–313. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01515.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. 1980. Attachment and Loss. Loss, Sadness and Depression. Vol. 3. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, A. R., S. Pitts, W. H. Denton, C. A. Stringer, and H. M. Evans. 2009. “A History of the Theory of Prenatal Attachment.” Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health 23 (4): 201–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Caccia, N., J. M. Johnson, G. E. Robinson, and T. Barna. 1991. “Impact of Prenatal Testing on Maternal-Fetal Bonding: chorionic Villus Sampling versus Amniocentesis.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 165 (4 Partt 1): 1122–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, P., H. van der Molen, A. Burdorf, M. Huysmans, L. Straker, M. Frings-Dresen, and A. van der Beek. 2019. “ Associations of Screen Work with Neck and Upper Extremity Symptoms: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.” Occupational and Environmental Medicine 76 (7): 502–509. doi:10.1136/oemed-2018-105553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon, J. T. 1993. “The Assessment of Antenatal Emotional Attachment: Development of a Questionnaire Instrument.” British Journal of Medical Psychology 66 (2): 167–183. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1993.tb01739.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon, J., C. Corkindale, P. Boyce, and E. Gamble. 2013. “A Longitudinal Study of Father-to-Infant Attachment: Antecedents and Correlates.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 31 (1): 15–30. doi:10.1080/02646838.2012.757694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranley, M. S. 1981. “Development of a Tool for the Measurement of Maternal Attachment during Pregnancy.” Nursing Research 30 (5): 281–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cock, E. S. A., J. Henrichs, C. M. J. M. Vreeswijk, A. J. B. M. Maas, C. H. A. M. Rijk, and H. J. A. van Bakel. 2016. “Continuous Feelings of Love? The Parental Bond from Pregnancy to Toddlerhood.” Journal of Family Psychology 30 (1): 125–134. doi:10.1037/fam0000138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., X. Xiu, Z. Wang, H. Li, and W. Wang. 2014. “The Relation of Infant Attachment to Attachment and Cognitive and Behavioral Outcomes in Early Childhood.” Early Human Development 90 (9): 459–464. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G., K. Reuter, K. Hameen-Anttila, N. Wang, Z. Deng, L. M. Wen, and G. He. 2019. “Understanding the Use of Smartphone Apps for Health Information among Pregnant Chinese Women: Mixed Methods Study.” JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7 (6): e12631. doi:10.2196/12631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, S. E., R. Vandermause, and M. Shaw. 2014. “First-Time Mothers Preparing for Birthing in an Electronic World: Internet and Mobile Phone Technology.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 32 (3): 240–253. doi:10.1080/02646838.2014.886104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, E. H., J. Harris, and K. M. Moland. 2016. “Web-Based Discussion Forums on Pregnancy Complaints and Maternal Health Literacy in Norway: A Qualitative Study.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 18 (5): e113. doi:10.2196/jmir.5270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, H. A., D. A. Forster, and M. S. Newton. 2014. “Sources of Information Used by Women during Pregnancy to Meet Their Information Needs.” Midwifery 30 (1): e26–e33. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurcan, F., N. E. Cagiltay, and K. Cagiltay. 2021. “Mapping Human-Computer Interaction Research Themes and Trends from Its Existence to Today: A Topic Modeling-Based Review of past 60 Years.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 37 (3): 267–280. doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1819668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, S., and A. K. Ventura. 2021. “Associations between Maternal Technology Use, Perceptions of Infant Temperament, and Indicators of Mother-to-Infant Attachment Quality.” Early Human Development 154: 105305–105305. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2021.105305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmstedt, A., A.-M. Widström, and A. Collins. 2006. “Psychological Correlates of Prenatal Attachment in Women Who Conceived after in Vitro Fertilization and Women Who Conceived Naturally.” Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) 33 (4): 303–310. doi:10.1207/s15327914nc5401_13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R., J. Zabatiero, S. R. Zubrick, D. Silva, and L. Straker. 2021. “The Association of Mobile Touch Screen Device Use with Parent–Child Attachment: A Systematic Review.” Ergonomics 64 (12): 1606–1622. doi:10.1080/00140139.2021.1948617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howie, E., P. Coenen, A. Campbell, S. Ranelli, and L. Straker. 2017. “Head, Trunk and Arm Posture Amplitude and Variation, Muscle Activity, Sedentariness and Physical Activity of 3 to 5 Year-Old Children during Tablet Computer Use Compared to Television Watching and Toy Play.” Applied Ergonomics 65: 41–50. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughson, J.-A. P., J. O. Daly, R. Woodward-Kron, J. Hajek, and D. Story. 2018. “The Rise of Pregnancy Apps and the Implications for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Women: Narrative Review.” JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6 (11): e189. doi:10.2196/mhealth.9119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantowitz, B. H., and R. D. Sorkin. 1983. Human Factors: Understanding People-System Relationships. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, M. E., and M. Bowen. 1988. Family Evaluation: An Approach Based on Bowen Theory. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kraschnewski, J. L., C. H. Chuang, E. S. Poole, T. Peyton, I. Blubaugh, J. Pauli, A. Feher, and M. Reddy. 2014. “Paging “Dr. Google”: Does Technology Fill the Gap Created by the Prenatal Care Visit Structure? Qualitative Focus Group Study with Pregnant women.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 16 (6): e147. doi:10.2196/jmir.3385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakoullis, L., and P. Zaphiris. 2016. “Culture and HCI: A Review of Recent Cultural Studies in HCI and Social Networks.” Universal Access in the Information Society 15 (4): 629–642. doi:10.1007/s10209-015-0445-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laxton-Kane, M., and P. Slade. 2002. “The Role of Maternal Prenatal Attachment in a Woman's Experience of Pregnancy and Implications for the Process of Care.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 20 (4): 253–266. doi:10.1080/0264683021000033174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., and M. Moon. 2016. “Utilization and Content Evaluation of Mobile Applications for Pregnancy, Birth, and Child Care.” Healthcare Informatics Research 22 (2): 73–80. doi:10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerum, C. W., and G. Lobiondo-Wood. 1989. “The Relationship of Maternal Age, Quickening, and Physical Symptoms of Pregnancy to the Development of Maternal-Fetal attachment.” Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) 16 (1): 13–17. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.1989.tb00848.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R., S. Bunke, and E. Psouni. 2016. “Attachment Relationships and Physical Activity in Adolescents: The Mediation Role of Physical Self-Concept.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 22: 160–169. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lovato, S. B., and A. M. Piper. 2019. “Young Children and Voice Search: What We Know from Human-Computer Interaction Research.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X., M. Oda, T. Ohba, H. Mitsubuchi, S. Masuda, and T. Katoh. 2017. “Association of Excessive Mobile Phone Use during Pregnancy with Birth Weight: An Adjunct Study in Kumamoto of Japan Environment and Children's Study.” Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 22 (1): 52. doi:10.1186/s12199-017-0656-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., and S. Pedersen. 2016. “An Australian Survey of Women's Use of Pregnancy and Parenting apps.” Women Birth 29 (4): 368–375. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2016.01.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, M., I. Hildingsson, C. Rubertsson, I. Radestad, and H. Lindgren. 2016. “Prenatal Attachment and Its Association with Foetal Movement during Pregnancy – A Population Based Survey.” Women and Birth 29 (6): 482–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, M. P., E. E. O’Connor, and S. P. Barnes. 2016. “Mother–Child Attachment Styles and Math and Reading Skills in Middle Childhood: The Mediating Role of Children's Exploration and Engagement.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 36: 295–306. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, B., and S. Coyne. 2019. “Technology Interference in the Parenting of Young Children: Implications for Mothers’ Perceptions of Coparenting.” Social Science Journal 53: 435–443.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, B., A. Galovan, J. Cravens, and M. Drouin. 2018. ““Technoference” and Implications for Mothers' and Fathers' Couple and Coparenting Relationship Quality.” Computers in Human Behavior 80: 303–313. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhail, M. S., M. C. Freda, R. B. Merkatz, R. Polizzotto, E. Mazloom, and I. R. Merkatz. 1991. “The Effect of Fetal Movement Counting on Maternal Attachment to Fetus.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 165 (4): 988–991. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(91)90455-Z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, L. S., and O. J. Rich. 1981. “Cognitive and Affective Aspects of the Response of Pregnant Women to Sonography.” Maternal Child Nursing 110: 5–39.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain, A., and K. J. Thomas. 2004. ““Any Other Comments?” Open Questions on Questionnaires – A Bane or a Bonus to Research??” BMC Medical Research Methodology 4 (1): 25. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Padilla-Walker, L. M., S. M. Coyne, and A. M. Fraser. 2012. “Getting a High‐Speed Family Connection: Associations between Family Media Use and Family Connection.” Family Relations 61 (3): 426–440. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00710.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajulo, M., M. Tolvanen, L. Karlsson, E. Halme-Chowdhury, C. Öst, P. Luyten, L. Mayes, and H. Karlsson. 2015. “The Prenatal Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: Exploring Factor Structure and Construct Validity of a New Measure in the Finn Brain Birth Cohort Pilot STUDY.” Infant Mental Health Journal 36 (4): 399–414. doi:10.1002/imhj.21523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petri, E., L. Palagini, O. Bacci, C. Borri, V. Teristi, C. Corezzi, S. Faraoni, P. Antonelli, C. Cargioli, S. Banti, G. Perugi, and M. Mauri. 2018. “Maternal–Foetal Attachment Independently Predicts the Quality of Maternal–Infant Bonding and Post-Partum Psychopathology.” The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 31 (23): 3153–3159. doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1365130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Centre. 2019. “Internet and Technology: Mobile Fact Sheet.” https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, C., F. Garofoli, C. Tzialla, S. Orcesi, A. Spinillo, P. Politi, U. Balottin, P. Manzoni, and M. Stronati. 2014. “Risk and Protective Factors in Maternal–Fetal Attachment Development.” Early Human Development 90 (2): 245–256. doi:10.1016/S0378-3782(14)50012-6.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, E., L. Frankel, T. Umemura, and N. Hazen. 2017. “The Relationship between Adult Attachment Orientation and Child Self-Regulation in Eating: The Mediating Role of Persuasive-Controlling Feeding Practices.” Eating Behaviors 26: 121–128. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott, J., and L. Mackie. 2017. “You Sort of Go down a Rabbit Hole…You’re Just Going to Keep on Searching”: A Qualitative Study of Searching Online for Pregnancy-Related Information during Pregnancy.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (6): e194. doi:10.2196/jmir.6302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radesky, J. S., C. J. Kistin, B. Zuckerman, K. Nitzberg, J. Gross, M. Kaplan-Sanoff, M. Augustyn, and M. Silverstein. 2014. “Patterns of Mobile Device Use by Caregivers and Children during Meals in Fast Food Restaurants.” Pediatrics 133 (4): e843–e849. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-3703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodger, D., A. Skuse, M. Wilmore, S. Humphreys, J. Dalton, M. Flabouris, and V. L. Clifton. 2013. “Pregnant Women's Use of Information and Communications Technologies to Access Pregnancy-Related Health Information in South Australia.” Australian Journal of Primary Health 19 (4): 308–312. doi:10.1071/PY13029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røhder, K., M. S. Væver, A. K. Aarestrup, R. K. Jacobsen, J. Smith-Nielsen, and M. L. E. Schiøtz. 2020. “Maternal–Fetal Bonding among Pregnant Women at Psychosocial Risk: The Roles of Adult Attachment Style, Prenatal Parental Reflective Functioning, and Depressive Symptoms.” PLoS One 15 (9): e0239208. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollè, L., M. Giordano, F. Santoniccolo, and T. Trombetta. 2020. “Prenatal Attachment and Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (8): 2644. doi:10.3390/ijerph17082644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, A., and B. Hägglöf. 2000. “Does Maternal Prenatal Attachment Predict Postnatal Mother–Infant Interaction?” Early Human Development 59 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1016/S0378-3782(00)00076-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, A., B. Hagglof, and M. Eisemann. 2000. “Own Memories of Upbringing as a Determinant of Prenatal Attachment in Expectant Women.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 18 (1): 67–74. doi:10.1080/02646830050001690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straker, L., R. Abbott, R. Collins, and A. Campbell. 2014. “Evidence-Based Guidelines for Wise Use of Electronic Games by Children.” Ergonomics 57 (4): 471–489. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.895856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straker, L., and C. Pollock. 2005. “Optimizing the Interaction of Children with Information and Communication Technologies.” Ergonomics 48 (5): 506–521. doi:10.1080/001400130400029233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straker, L., C. Pollock, and R. Burgess-Limerick. 2006. “Towards Evidence-Based Guidelines for Wise Use of Computers by Children.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36 (12): 1045–1053. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2006.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, H., C. Chen, and Y. Hao. 2021. “How People Perceive and Expect Safety in Autonomous Vehicles: An Empirical Study for Risk Sensitivity and Risk-Related Feelings.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 37 (4): 340–351. doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1860515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theran, S. A., A. A. Levendosky, G. Anne Bogat, and A. C. Huth-Bocks. 2005. “Stability and Change in Mothers' Internal Representations of Their Infants over Time.” Attachment & Human Development 7 (3): 253–268. doi:10.1080/14616730500245609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, S., S. Reimer Kirkham, and J. MacDonald-Emes. 1997. “Interpretive Description: A Noncategorical Qualitative Alternative for Developing Nursing Knowledge.” Research in Nursing & Health 20 (2): 169–177. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199704)20:2<169::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-I.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toh, S., P. Coenen, E. Howie, A. Smith, S. Mukherjee, D. Mackey, and L. Straker. 2020. “A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Mobile Touch Screen Device Use and Musculoskeletal Symptoms and Visual Health in Adolescents.” Applied Ergonomics 85: 103028–103028. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toh, S., P. Coenen, E. Howie, and L. Straker. 2017. “The Associations of Mobile Touch Screen device use with musculoskeletal symptoms and exposures: A systematic review.” PLoS One 12 (8): e0181220. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, N., K. Hainey, A. Liu, A. Poulton, M. Peek, J. Kim, and R. Nanan. 2014. “An Emerging Model of Maternity Care: Smartphone, Midwife, Doctor? Women and Birth.” Women and Birth 27 (1): 64–67. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2013.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombetta, T., M. Giordano, F. Santoniccolo, L. Vismara, A. M. Della Vedova, and L. Rollè. 2021. “Pre-Natal Attachment and Parent-to-Infant Attachment: A Systematic Review.” Frontiers in Psychology 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, K., B. Mathews, and K. Kerns. 2013. “Mother-Child Attachment and Cognitive Performance in Middle Childhood: An Examination of Mediating Mechanisms.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 28 (2): 259–270. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J., and D. Klein. 2008. The Systems Framework. Family Theories, 151–177. 3rd ed. Thoasand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, B., J. Zhou, H. N. Wang, and H. Hideyuki. 2017. “How Influential Are Mental Models on Interaction Performance? Exploring the Gap between Users’ and Designers’ Mental Models through a New Quantitative Method.” Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2017: 1–14. doi:10.1155/2017/3683546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., D. Liu, Y. Rao, H. Zeng, F. Zhang, L. Wang, Y. Xie, M. Sharma, and Y. Zhao. 2018. “Prolonged Screen Viewing Times and Sociodemographic Factors among Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15 (3): 403–419. doi:10.3390/ijerph15030403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuill, N., and A. F. Martin. 2016. “Curling up with a Good E-Book: Mother–Child Shared Story Reading on Screen or Paper Affects Embodied Interaction and Warmth.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1951–1951. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., H. J. Webb, C. A. Pepping, K. Swan, O. Merlo, E. A. Skinner, E. Avdagic, and M. Dunbar. 2017. “Review: Is Parent–Child Attachment a Correlate of Children's Emotion Regulation and Coping?” International Journal of Behavioral Development 41 (1): 74–93. doi:10.1177/0165025415618276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar