Development of the Smart Tools Proneness Questionnaire (STP-Q): an instrument to assess the individual propensity to use smart tools

References

• Agarwal, R., and J. Prasad. 1999. “Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?” Decision Sciences 30 (2): 361–391. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cegarra, J., B. Valéry, E. Avril, C. Calmettes, and J. Navarro. 2020. “OpenMATB: A Multi-Attribute Task Battery Promoting Task Customization, Software Extensibility and Experiment Replicability.” Behavior Research Methods 52 (5): 1980–1990. doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01364-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff, N. 1988. “The Eigenvalues-Greater-than-One Rule and the Reliability of Components.” Psychological Bulletin 103 (2): 276–279. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comstock, J. R., and R. J. Arnegard. 1992. “The Multi-Attribute Task Battery for Human Operator Workload and Strategic Behavior Research.” In NASA Technical Memorandum (Issue January).
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2014. Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8.
   Google Scholar
• Dzindolet, M. T., H. Beck, L. Pierce, and L. Dawe. 2001. A framework of automation use. March. doi:10.1037/e447142006-001.
   Google Scholar
• Dzindolet, M. T., S. A. Peterson, R. A. Pomranky, L. G. Pierce, and H. P. Beck. 2003. “The Role of Trust in Automation Reliance.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58 (6): 697–718. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00038-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzindolet, M. T., L. Pierce, and H. Beck. 2009. “An Examination of the Social, Cognitive, and Motivational Factors That Affect Automation Reliance.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification (Human Factors in Defence), edited by D. H. Andrews, R. P. Herz, and M. B. Wolf; New edition edition, 1–35. Boca Raton: CRC Press. http://medcontent.metapress.com/index/A65RM03P4874243N.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.moonballoon.org/workshop/2008Workshops/DZINDOLETCIDchapter.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dzindolet, M. T., L. G. Pierce, H. P. Beck, L. a Dawe, and B. W. Anderson. 2001. “Predicting Misuse and Disuse of Combat Identification Systems.” Military Psychology 13 (3): 147–164. doi:10.1207/S15327876MP1303_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. 2017. “From Here to Autonomy.” Human Factors 59 (1): 5–27. doi:10.1177/0018720816681350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faure, J., M. Joulain, and F. Osiurak. 2015. “Validation française des échelles de maximation et de regret de Schwartz et collaborateurs.” Psychologie Française 60 (3): 301–316. doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, B. 1997. Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Theory: Critical Investigations. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gana, K., and M. Akremi. 1998. “L’échelle de Disposition à l’Ennui (EDE): Adaptation française et validation du Boredom Proneness Scale (BP).” L'année Psychologique 98 (3): 429–450. doi:10.3406/psy.1998.28576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, N. 2005. “Task Delegation Using Experience-Based Multi-Dimensional Trust.” Proceedings of The Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 489–496. doi:10.1145/1082473.1082548.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. 2007. “Procedure and Dynamic Display Relocation on Performance in a Multitask Environment.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans 37 (1): 47–57. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2006.886341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. 2009. “Mind, Machine and Morality.” In Mind, Machine and Morality: Toward a Philosophy of Human-Technology Symbiosis. Chichester, England: Ashgate publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. 2014. “Automation: How Much is Too Much?” Ergonomics 57 (3): 449–454. doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.816375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A. 2021. “Avoiding Adverse Autonomous Agent Actions.” Human–Computer Interaction 2021: 1–26. doi:10.1080/07370024.2021.1970556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., D. R. Billings, K. E. Schaefer, J. Y. C. Chen, E. J. de Visser, and R. Parasuraman. 2011. “A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction.” Human Factors 53 (5): 517–527. doi:10.1177/0018720811417254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., and M. H. Chignell. 1988. “Mental Workload Dynamics in Adaptive Interface Design.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 18 (4): 647–658. doi:10.1109/21.17382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., I. Nourbakhsh, and J. Stewart. 2019. “On the Future of Transportation in an Era of Automated and Autonomous Vehicles.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (16): 7684–7691. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805770115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., A. Pepe, and L. Murphy. 2005. “Hedonomics: The Power of Positive and Pleasurable Ergonomics.” Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications 13 (1): 8–14. doi:10.1177/106480460501300104.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. 2018. “The Thing and I: understanding the Relationship between User and Product.” In Funology 2, 301–313. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hoc, J.-M. 2000. “From Human-Machine Interaction to Human-Machine Cooperation.” Ergonomics 43 (7): 833–843. doi:10.1080/001401300409044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoc, J.-M., M. S. Young, and J.-M. Blosseville. 2009. “Cooperation between Drivers and Automation: Implications for Safety.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 10 (2): 135–160. doi:10.1080/14639220802368856.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H. 2000. “Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” In Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling, 465–497. California: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., and A. Panter. 1995. “Writing about Structural Equation Models.” In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, 158–176. Hoyle, RH Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., and P. M. Bentler. 1995. Evaluating model fit.
   Google Scholar
• INSEE. 2003. Nomenclature des professions et catégories socioprofessionnelles.
   Google Scholar
• International Standardization Organization (ISO). 1997. ISO 9241-1:1997 Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) – Part 1: General Introduction. https://www.iso.org/standard/16873.html
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., E. M. Donahue, and R. L. Kentle. 1991. “Big Five Inventory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 7550. doi:10.1037/t07550-000.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Frey, S. H. 2003. “ What's so special about human tool use??” Neuron 39 (2): 201–204. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00424-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moray, N., T. Inagaki, and M. Itoh. 2000. “Adaptive Automation, Trust, and Self-Confidence in Fault Management of Time-Critical Tasks.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied 6 (1): 44–58. 10.1037//0278-7393.6.1.44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, J., and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 2012. “Flow Theory and Research.” The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2 Ed.), 2012, 1–23. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0018.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, J. 2017. “Human–Machine Interaction Theories and Lane Departure Warnings.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 18 (6): 519–547. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2016.1243274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J. 2019. “A State of Science on Highly Automated Driving.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 20 (3): 366–396. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2018.1439544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., S. Allali, N. Cabrignac, and J. Cegarra. 2021. “Impact of Pilot’s Expertise on Selection, Use, Trust, and Acceptance of Automation.” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 51 (5): 432–441. doi:10.1109/THMS.2021.3090199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., and C. Gabaude. 2020. “Human Factors Perspectives on Highly Automated Driving.” Le Travail Humain 83 (4): 285–295. doi:10.3917/th.834.0285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., and P. A. Hancock. 2022. “How Tools Created Humans.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., L. Heuveline, E. Avril, and J. Cegarra. 2018. “Influence of Human-Machine Interactions and Task Demand on Automation Selection and Use.” Ergonomics 61 (12): 1601–1612. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1501517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., F. Mars, and M. S. Young. 2011. “Lateral Control Assistance in Car Driving: Classification, Review and Future Prospects.” IET Intelligent Transport Systems 5 (3): 207–220. doi:10.1049/iet-its.2010.0087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., and F. Osiurak. 2015. “When Do we Use Automatic Tools Rather than Doing a Task Manually? Influence of Automatic Tool Speed.” The American Journal of Psychology 128 (1): 77–88. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.1.0077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., and F. Osiurak. 2017. “The More Intelligent People Are, the More They Use Tools.” Psychologie Française 62: 85–91. doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M., and P. A. Hancock. 1984. “Forgotten Moments: A Note on Skewness and Kurtosis as Influential Factors in Inferences Extrapolated from Response Distributions.” Journal of Motor Behavior 16 (3): 320–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielse, J. 1994. Usability Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, K. P., 1949. “Man the Tool-Maker.” In British Museum (Natural History), edited by T. trustees of the british Museum. London: Trustees of the British Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Osiurak, F., J. Navarro, and E. Reynaud. 2018. “How Our Cognition Shapes and is Shaped by Technology: A Common Framework for Understanding Human Tool-Use Interactions in the past, Present, and Future.” Frontiers in Psychology 9 (March): 293–297. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osiurak, F., C. Wagner, S. Djerbi, and J. Navarro. 2013. “To Do It or to Let an Automatic Tool Do it? The Priority of Control Over Effort.” Experimental Psychology 60 (6): 453–468. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A., and C. L. Colby. 2015. “An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0.” Journal of Service Research 18 (1): 59–74. doi:10.1177/1094670514539730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., and D. Manzey. 2010. “Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration.” Human Factors 52 (3): 381–410. doi:10.1177/0018720810376055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., and V. Riley. 1997. “Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse.” Human Factors 39 (2): 230–253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parente, S. L., and E. C. Prescott. 1994. “Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development.” Journal of Political Economy 102 (2): 298–321. doi:10.1086/261933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 1995. “Diffusion of Innovations.” In Macmillian Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rossier, J., C. Rigozzi, and S. Berthoud. 2002. “Validation de la version française de l’échelle de contrôle de Levenson (IPC), influence de variables démographiques et de la personnalité.” Annales Médico-Psychologiques, Revue Psychiatrique 160 (2): 138–148. doi:10.1016/S0003-4487(01)00111-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., and A. Chavaillaz. 2018. “How Operators Make Use of Wide-Choice Adaptable Automation: Observations from a Series of Experimental Studies.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 19 (2): 135–155. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2017.1297866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scerbo, M. W. 1996. Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation.
   Google Scholar
• Scerbo, M. W. 2006. “Dynamic Function Allocation.” In International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, edited by W. Karwowski, 1080–1082. London: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, K. E., J. Y. C. Chen, J. L. Szalma, and P. A. Hancock. 2016. “A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems.” Human Factors 58 (3): 377–400. doi:10.1177/0018720816634228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. 2000. “Universal Usability.” Communications of the ACM 43 (5): 84–91. doi:10.1145/332833.332843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thropp, J. E., T. Oron-Gilad, J. L. Szalma, and P. A. Hancock. 2018. “Calibrating Adaptable Automation to Individuals.” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 48 (6): 691–701. doi:10.1109/THMS.2018.2844124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiu Wright, L., C. Nancarrow, and P. M. H. Kwok. 2001. “Food Taste Preferences and Cultural Influences on Consumption.” British Food Journal 103 (5): 348–357. doi:10.1108/00070700110396321.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and H. Bala. 2008. “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions.” Decision Sciences 39 (2): 273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 1996. “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test.” Decision Sciences 27 (3): 451–481. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27: 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. 2008. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition (WAIS–IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Yildirim, C., and A. P. Correia. 2015. “Exploring the Dimensions of Nomophobia: Development and Validation of a Self-Reported Questionnaire.” Computers in Human Behavior 49: 130–137. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud, R. W. 1979. “Individual Differences and MIS Success: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Management Science 25 (10): 966–979. doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.10.966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar