Integration of sex and gender in interventions by students in ergonomics

References

• Adams, R. S., J. Turns, and C. J. Atman. 2003. “Educating Effective Engineering Designers: The Role of Reflective Practice.” Designing in Context 24 (3): 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, V. 2018. “Développement d'un modèle d'évaluation des processus d'interventions ergonomiques visant à prévenir les troubles musculosquelettiques.” et améliorer les situations de travail, Doctoral dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., and D. K. Mumby. 2004. Reworking Gender: A Feminist Communicology of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bellemare, M., M. Marier, and D. Allard. 2001. “Le journal de bord: un outil pour l’intervention et la recherche en ergonomie.” In Comptes rendus du congrès SELF-ACE 2001: les transformations du travail, enjeux pour l’ergonomie, vol. 5, 58–62. Montréal: ACE-Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Bergold, J., and S. Thomas. 2012. “Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 37 (4): 191–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroly, S., and F. Barcellini. 2019. “A Conceptual Framework of Collective Activity in Constructive Ergonomics.” In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), edited by S. Bagnara, R. Tartaglia, S. Albolino, T. Alexander, and Y. Fujita. IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 822. Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Caroly, S., and Y. Clot. 2004. “Du travail collectif au collectif de travail: développer des stratégies d'expérience.” Formation Emploi 88 (1): 43–55. doi:10.3406/forem.2004.1737.
   Google Scholar
• Chappert, F., K. Messing, E. Peltier, and J. Riel. 2016. “Conditions de travail et parcours dans l’entreprise: vers une transformation qui intègre l’ergonomie et le genre?” Revue multidisciplinaire sur l'emploi, le syndicalisme et le travail 9 (2): 49–72. doi:10.7202/1036258ar.
   Google Scholar
• Chatigny, C., M. Laberge, E. Laperrière, ME. Major, S. Caroly, D. Cau-Bareille, and M. Lacomblez. 2014. La prise en compte du genre/sexe dans les interventions en ergonomie et dans la formation. In Symposium at the 45th Conference of the Association of Canadian Ergonomists, Montreal, Canada, October 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Chatigny, C., N. Vézina, and K. Messing. 2014. “L’intégration du genre dans la formation des ergonomes.” In Conférence de l’Association Canadienne de l’Ergonomie (ACE). Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Côté, J. 2016. “Can Using a Sex/Gender Lens Provide New Insights into MSD Mechanisms?” In Conference PREMUS, 2016, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics”. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Daniellou, D. 2005. “The French-Speaking Ergonomists’ Approach to Work Activity: Cross-Influences of Field Intervention and Conceptual Models.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 6 (5): 409–427.
   Google Scholar
• Dunberry, A., and C. Péchard. 2007. L’évaluation de la formation dans l’entreprise: état de la question et perspectives. Rapport du CIRED, UQAM.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” The Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550. doi:10.2307/258557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falzon, P. 2005. “Ergonomics, Knowledge Development and the Design of Enabling Environments, Humanizing Work and Wok Environments.” In Conference of Humanizing Work and Work Environment (HXXE), 1–8. Guwahati, India.
   Google Scholar
• Fausto-Sterling, A. 2017. “Against Dichotomy.” Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 1 (1): 63–66. doi:10.26613/esic.1.1.11.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada 2021. “What is Gender Analysis Plus”. https://women-gender-equality.canada.ca/en/gender-based-analysis-plus/what-gender-based-analysis-plus.html
   Google Scholar
• Guérin, F., V. Pueyo, P. Béguin, A. Garrigou, F. Hubault, J. Maline, and T. Morlet. 2021. Concevoir le travail, le défi de l’ergonomie. France: Octarès Toulouse.
   Google Scholar
• Habib, R., and Messing. R. K. 2012. “Gender, Women’s Work and Ergonomics.” Ergonomics 55 (2): 129–132. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.646322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, M., and A. Goodyer. 2015. “The Contradictions of Contemporary Social Work: An Ironic Response.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (2): 747–760. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, M., and M. B. Miles. 2002. The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, G., and H. Donnellan. 2010. “Recognising the Person within the Developing Professional: Tracking the Early Careers of Newly Qualified Child Care Social Workers in Three Local Authorities in England.” Social Work Education 29 (3): 305–318. doi:10.1080/02615470902984663.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J.L., L. Greaves, and R. Repta. 2007. Better Science With Sex and Gender: A Primer for Health Research. Vancouver: Women’s Health Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Laberge, M., V. Blanchette-Luong, A. Blanchard, H. Sultan-Taïeb, J. Riel, V. Lederer, J. Saint-Charles, C. Chatigny, M. Lefrançois, J. Webb, M.E. Major, C. Vaillancourt, and K. Messing. 2020. “Impacts of considering Sex and Gender During Intervention Studies in Occupational Health: Researchers’ Perspectives.” Applied Ergonomics 82: 102960. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laberge, Marie, Bénédicte Calvet, Marc Fredette, Nassim Tabet, Aurélie Tondoux, Dolores Bayard, and Curtis Breslin. 2016. “Unexpected Events: Learning Opportunities or Injury Risks for Apprentices in Low-Skilled Jobs? A Pilot Study.” Safety Science 86: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laberge, M., and S. Caroly. 2016. “Prendre en compte le sexe et le genre dans le choix des situations à analyser: un enjeu pour l’intervention ergonomique.” Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé (PISTES): 18 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Laberge, M., S. Caroly, J. Riel, and K. Messing. 2020. “Considering Sex and Gender in Ergonomics: Exploring the Hows and Whys.” Applied Ergonomics 85: 103039. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laberge, M., A. Tondoux, F. Camiré Tremblay, and E. MacEachen. 2017. “Occupational Health and Safety in a Vocational Training Program: How Gender Impacts Teachers’ Strategies and Power Relationships: Santé et sécurité des stagiaires dans un programme de formation professionnelle: Impact du genre sur les stratégies et rapports de pouvoir.” New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy: NS 27 (3): 382–402. doi:10.1177/1048291117725720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laberge, M., N. Vézina, and J. Saint-Charles. 2012. “Safe and Healthy Integration Into Semiskilled Jobs: Does Gender Matter? Work: A Journal of Prevention.” Work 41: 4642–4649. doi:10.3233/WOR-2012-0102-4642.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lauzier, M., and D. Denis. 2016. Accroitre le transfert des apprentissages. Vers de nouvelles connaissances, pratiques et expériences. Montréal: PUQ.
   Google Scholar
• Légaré, France, Francine Borduas, Adriana Freitas, André Jacques, Gaston Godin, Francesca Luconi, and Jeremy Grimshaw. 2014. “Development of a Simple 12-Item Theory-Based Instrument to Assess the Impact of Continuing Professional Development on Clinical Behavioral Intentions.” PLoS ONE 9 (3): e91013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leplat, J. 2002. “De l’étude de cas à l’analyse de l’activité.” Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé, (4–2): 1–31. doi:10.4000/pistes.3658.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, K. 2021. Bent out of Shape: Shame Solidarity and Women’s Biology at Work. Between the Lines (chap. 4-5), Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, K., M. Laberge, and J. Riel. 2021. “Sexe/genre et intervention ergonomique.” In Dictionnaire encyclopédique de l'ergonomie: 150 notions clés, edited by E. Brangier and G. Valéry, 496. Malakoff, France: Éditions Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, K., M. Lefrançois, and J. Saint-Charles. 2021. “Observing Inequality: Can Ergonomic Observations Help Interventions Transform the Role of Gender in Work Activity?” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 30 (2): 215–249. doi:10.1007/s10606-018-9337-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing, Karen, Laura Punnett, Meg Bond, Kristina Alexanderson, Jean Pyle, Shelia Zahm, David Wegman, Susan R. Stock, and Sylvie de Grosbois. 2003. “Be the Fairest of Them All: Challenges and Recommendations for the Treatment of Gender in Occupational Health Research.” American Journal of Industrial Medicine 43 (6): 618–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riel, J. 2015. “Étude s’appuyant sur un cadre d'analyse en ergonomie de l'activité.” et s'inscrivant dans une perspective féministe pour analyser les situations de travail d'enseignantes de métiers à prédominance masculine en formation professionnelle au secondaire au Québec. Doctoral dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Riel, J., J. Saint-Charles, and K. Messing. 2017. “Women’s Occupational Health: Resisting When We Can: Santé des femmes au travail: mobiliser quand c’est encore possible.” NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy 27 (3): 279–283. doi:10.1177/1048291117724562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouat, S., B. Cuvillier, and E. Laneyrie. 2021. “Le processus d’intervention en santé au travail: éclairer les enjeux de l’action par un exercice de formalisation de l’activité.” Pratiques Psychologiques 27 (1): 33–1763. doi:10.1016/j.prps.2019.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, S. 2014. “Gendered Organizational Cultures, Structures and Processes: The Cultural Exclusion of Women in Organizations.” In Gender in Organizations: Are Men Allies or Adversaries to Women’s Career Advancement?, edited by R. J. Burke and D. A. Major, 193–216. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• St-Vincent, M., N. Vézina, M. Bellemare, D. Denis, É. Ledoux, and D. Imbeau. 2014. Ergonomic Intervention. Pennsauken, New Jersey: BookBaby.
   Google Scholar
• Vézina, N. 2010. The Evolution of Our Representations of WMSD: Integrating Knowledge and Ensuring Concerted Preventive Action. In Book of Abstracts, PREMUS 2010, Seventh International Conference on Prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders, 29 August-2 September 2010, Angers, France.
   Google Scholar
• Vézina, N., C. Chatigny, and B. Calvet. 2016. “L’intervention ergonomique: que fait-on des caractéristiques personnelles comme le sexe et le genre?” Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé 18 (2): 1–19. doi:10.4000/pistes.4847.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J.V. 1984. “The Zone of Proximal Development: Some Conceptuel Issues.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1984 (23): 7–18. doi:10.1002/cd.23219842303.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2011. Gender Mainstreaming for Health Managers: A Practical Approach. Genève: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 282 p.
   Google Scholar