‘My whole body is at work’: the silence of gendered body techniques in cork industry in an era of automation

References

• APCOR (Associação Portuguesa da Cortiça). 2021. The APCOR’s Cork Yearbook 2020. Santa Maria de Lamas: APCOR.
   Google Scholar
• Badri, A., B. Boudreau-Trudel, and A. Souissi. 2018. “Occupational Health and Safety in the Industry 4.0 Era: A Cause for Major Concern?” Safety Science 109: 403–411. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobillier Chaumon, M.-E. 2021. “Emerging Technologies and Issues for Activity and Occupational Health.” In Digital Transformations in the Challenge of Activity and Work: understanding and Supporting Technological Changes, edited by M.-E. Bobillier Chaumon, 3–15. London: ISTE Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781119808343.ch1.
   Google Scholar
• Boccara, V., C. Delgoulet, V. Zara-Meylan, B. Barthe, I. Gailard, and S. Meylan. 2019. The role and positioning of observation in ergonomics approaches: A research and design project. In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, edited by S. Bagnara, R. Tartaglia, S. Albolino, T. Alexander, and Y. Fujita, 1821–1828. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_189.
   Google Scholar
• Branco, A., and F. Parejo. 2011. The Creation of a Competitive Advantage in the Portuguese Cork Industry: The Contribution of an Industrial District. Lisbon: Gabinete de História Económica e Social.
   Google Scholar
• Calvet, B., J. Riel, V. Couture, and K. Messing. 2012. “Work Organisation and Gender among Hospital Cleaners in Quebec after the Merger of 'light' and 'heavy' work classifications.” Ergonomics 55 (2): 160–172. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.576776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroly, S., M. Bohórquez, and A. Fortune. 2020. “Les Effets de L’organisation du Travail Sur la Division Sexuelle du Travail et Les Troubles Musculosquelettiques Dans le Secteur Agricole.” In Genre, Conditions de Travail et Santé. Qu'est-ce Qui a Changé?, edited by Ch. Casse and M. De Troyer, 46–51. Bruxelles: European Trade Union Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Casse, Ch., and M. De Troyer. 2020. “Elles et Ils au Travail et Face Aux Risques Professionnels: Questions de Justice Sociale et de Santé.” In Genre, Conditions de Travail et Santé. Qu'est-ce Qui a Changé?, edited by Ch. Casse and M. De Troyer, 5–11. Bruxelles: European Trade Union Institute.
   Google Scholar
• COE (Conseil d’Orientation pour l’Emploi). 2017. Automatisation, Numérisation et Emploi: les Impacts Sur le Volume, la Structure et la Localisation de L’emploi. Paris: Conseil d'Orientation pour l'Emploi.
   Google Scholar
• Cru, D., and C. Dejours. 1983. “Les Savoir-Faire de Prudence Dans Les Métiers du Batiment. Les Cahiers Médico-Sociaux.” 247 3: 239.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, L., S. Nogueira, and M. Lacomblez. 2014. “Beyond a Man's World: Contributions From Considering Gender in the Study of Bus Drivers' Work Activity.” Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation 47 (4): 431–440. doi:10.3233/WOR-131611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, L., D. Silva, and M. Lacomblez. 2021. “A Transformação da Cortiça Como Património de um Território e a Construção de um “Projet-Héritage” a Partir Do Legado da Atividade.” Ergologia 25: 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, L., D. Silva, and M. Macedo. 2021. “This is a Job for Women, Isn’t It?”: The Evolution of a Traditional Gendered Occupational Segmentation in a Portuguese Industrial Cluster.” In Proceedings of 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021), edited by N. Black, W. Neumann, and I. Noy, 429–437. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_53.
   Google Scholar
• EU-OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work). 2014. New Risks and Trends in the Safety and Health of Women at Work. Luxembourg: EU-OSHA. doi:10.2802/69206.
   Google Scholar
• EU-OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work). 2018. Foresight on New and Emerging Occupational Safety and Health Risks Associated with Digitalisation by 2025. Bilbao: The European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. doi:10.2802/515834.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2018. Automation, Digitisation and Platforms: Implications for Work and Employment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2806/090974.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020. Gender Equality at Work. European Working Conditions Survey 2015 Series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2806/934654.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., M. Arntz, U. Zierahn, T. Gregory, S. Carretero Gómez, I. Gozález Vázquez, and K. Jonkers. 2019. The Impact of Technological Innovation on the Future of Work. Seville: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Howcroft, D., and J. Rubery. 2019. “Bias in, Bias Out’: Gender Equality and the Future of Work Debate.” Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work 29 (2): 213–227. doi:10.1080/10301763.2019.1619986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouanneaux, M. 2011. De L’agir au Travail. Toulouse: Octarès.
   Google Scholar
• Laberge, M., S. Caroly, J. Riel, and K. Messing. 2020. “Considering Sex and Gender in Ergonomics: Exploring the Hows and Whys.” Applied Ergonomics 85: 103039. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacomblez, M., M. Bellemare, C. Chatigny, C. Delgoulet, A. Re, L. Trudel, and R. Vasconcelos. 2007. “Ergonomic Analysis of Work Activity and Training: Basic Paradigm, Evolutions and Challenges.” In Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics, edited by R. Pikaar, E. Koningsveld, and P. Settels, 129–142. Boston: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-008045373-6/50009-X.
   Google Scholar
• Lacomblez, M., E. Ollagnier, and C. Teiger. 2016. “Les Ergonomes Peuvent-Ils Rester Borgnes? À Propos de la Relation Intervention-Formation-Genre.” Perspectives Interdisciplinaires Sur le Travail et la Santé 18 (18-2): 1–20. doi:10.4000/pistes.4829.
   Google Scholar
• Laperrière, E., K. Messing, and R. Bourbonnais. 2017. “Work Activity in Food Service: The Significance of Customer Relations, Tipping Practices and Gender for Precenting Musculoskeletal Disorders.” Applied Ergonomics 58: 89–101. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leso, V., L. Fontana, and I. Iavicoli. 2018. “The Occupational Health and Safety Dimension of Industry 4.0.” La Medicina Del Lavoro 109 (5): 327–338. doi:10.23749/mdl.v110i5.7282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 1935. “Les Techniques du Corps.” Journal of Psychologie 32: 271–293.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 1979. “Body Techniques.”. In Sociology and Psychology: Essays, edited by M. Mauss, 95–123. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 2009. Techniques, Technology and Civilisation. New York: Durkheim Press/Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, A. 2002. A Economia do Sector da Cortiça em Portugal. Evolução das actividades de produção e de transformação ao longo dos séculos XIX e XX. Porto: Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, K. 1998. One-Eyed Science: Occupational Health and Working Women. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, K. 2021. Bent out of Shape: Shame, Solidarity and Women’s Body at Work. Toronto: Between the Lines.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, K., M. Lefrançois, and J. Saint-Charles. 2019. “Why Do We Often Forget Gender during Ergonomic Interventions?.” In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, edited by S. Bagnara, R. Tartaglia, S. Albolino, T. Alexander, and Y. Fujita, 245–250. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96065-4_27.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, K., M. Lefrançois, and J. Saint-Charles. 2021. “Observing Inequality: Can Ergonomic Observations Help Interventions Transform the Role of Gender in Work Activity?” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 30: 215–249. doi:10.1007/s10606-018-9337-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D., B. Brandth, and E. Kvande. 2005. “Thinking about Gender, Bodies and Work.” In Gender, Bodies and Work, edited by D. Morgan, B. Brandth, and E. Kvande, 1–15. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315254609.
   Google Scholar
• Nazareno, L., and D. Schiff. 2021. “The Impact of Automation and Artificial Intelligence on Worker Well-Being.” Technology in Society 67: 101679. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouroudine, A. 2001. Techniques et Cultures. Comment S’approprie-t-on Des Technologies Transférées? Toulouse: Octarès.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellet, S., and N. Vézina. 2008. “Professional Know-How and MSD Prevention: Conceptual and Methodological Reflection Leading to Their Identification and the Start of Their Construction.” Perspectives Interdisciplinaires Sur le Travail et la Santé 10 (10-2): 1–35. doi:10.4000/pistes.2260.
   Google Scholar
• Petit, J., K. Chassaing, and F. Daniellou. 2009. “Le Corps Dans la Conception ou la Transformation de Situations de Travail.” Corps, 6, 39−45. doi:10.3917/corp.006.0039.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, S. 2016. “Robots, Industry 4.0 and Humans, or Why Assembly Work Is More than Routine Work.” Societies 6 (2): 16. doi:10.3390/soc6020016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piasna, A., and J. Drahokoupil. 2017. “Gender Inequalities in the New World of Work.” Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 23 (3): 313–332. doi:10.1177/1024258917713839.
   Google Scholar
• Pillon, T. 2014. “Le Corps Ouvrier au Travail.” Travailler 32 (2): 151–169. doi:10.3917/trav.032.0151.
   Google Scholar
• Poizat, G. 2015. “Technique(s) et Engagement du Corps au Travail.”. In L’apprentissage Des Techniques Corporelles, edited by M. Durand, D. Hauw, and G. Poizat, 223–236. Paris: PUF. doi:10.3917/puf.duran.2015.01.0223.
   Google Scholar
• Ribault, P. 2011. “Du Toucher au Geste Technique: la «Techné Des Corps».” Appareil 8 (8): 1–23. doi:10.4000/appareil.1315.
   Google Scholar
• Rot, G., and F. Vatin. 2018. “Le Travail et L’automation: réflexions sur l’activité productive.” Progressistes: Science, Travail & Environnement 20: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Y. 2000. Le Paradigme Ergologique ou un Métier de Philosophe. Toulouse: Octarès.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Y. 2011. “Pourquoi le Concept de Corps-Soi? Corps-Soi, Activité, Expérience.” Travail & Apprentissages 7: 148–177. doi:10.3917/ta.007.0148.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Y. 2021. Travail, Ergologie et Politique. Paris: La Dispute.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Y, and L. Durrive. 2003. Travail et Ergologie. Toulouse: Octarès.
   Google Scholar
• Séris, J. P. 1994. La Technique. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Sigaut, F. 1999. “Deux Leçons D’Haudricourt.” Techniques & Culture 33: 185–187. doi:10.4000/tc.361.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, D, and L. Cunha. in press. “Looking for the Defect”: The Emerging Frontiers between the Work Activity and Automation in a Cork Industrial District.” Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Vincent, M., N. Vézina, M. Bellemare, D. Denis, E. Ledoux, and D. Imbeau. 2014. Ergonomic Intervention. Montréal: Institut de recherche robert-sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST).
   Google Scholar
• Vermersch, P. 1989. “Expliciter L’expérience.” Éducation Permanente 100/101: 123–131.
   Google Scholar
• Winck, J. C. 2003. Doença Respiratória Dos Trabalhadores da Indústria da Cortiça (Tese de Doutoramento). Porto: MEDISA Edições e Divulgações Científicas, Lda.
   Google Scholar