Providing different levels of accuracy about the reliability of automation to a human operator: impact on human performance

References

• Alonso, V., and P. de la Puente. 2018. “System Transparency in Shared Autonomy: A Mini Review.” Frontiers in Neurorobotics 12: 83. doi:10.1080/fnbot.2018.00083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asan, O., and P. Carayon. 2017. “Human Factors of Health Information Technology – Challenges and Opportunities.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 33 (4): 255–257. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1282755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avril, E., J. Cegarra, L. Wioland, and J. Navarro. 2021. “Automation Type and Reliability Impact on Visual Automation Monitoring and Human Performance.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 38 (1): 64–77.
   Google Scholar
• Avril, E., B. Valéry, J. Navarro, L. Wioland, and J. Cegarra. 2021. “Effect of Imperfect Information and Action Automation on Attentional Allocation.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 37 (11): 1063–1073. doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1870817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri, N., and G. A. Jamieson. 2004a. “Considering Subjective Trust and Monitoring Behavior in Assessing Automation-Induced “Complacency.” Human Performance, Situation Awareness, and Automation: Current Research and Trends 2: 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri, N, and G. A. Jamieson. 2004b. “The Impact of Context-Related Reliability on Automation Failure Detection and Scanning Behaviour.” 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37583), 1, 212–217. 10-13 Oct 2004; The hague, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri , N. S. Mohite, D. Junta, and G. A. Jamieson. 2003. “Context-Related Reliability and Automation Failure Detection.” Proceedings of EAM 2003, the 22nd European Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control, 41. June 2-4, 2003; Linköping, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. R., and M. W. Scerbo. 2007. “Automation-Induced Complacency for Monitoring Highly Reliable Systems: The Role of Task Complexity, System Experience, and Operator Trust.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8 (4): 321–348. doi:10.1080/14639220500535301.
   Google Scholar
• Barg-Walkow, L. H., and W. A. Rogers. 2016. “The Effect of Incorrect Reliability Information on Expectations, Perceptions, and Use of Automation.” Human Factors 58 (2): 242–260. doi:10.1177/0018720815610271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beller, J., M. Heesen, and M. Vollrath. 2013. “Improving the Driver-Automation Interaction: An Approach Using Automation uncertainty.” Human Factors 55 (6): 1130–1141. doi:10.1177/0018720813482327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegarra, J., B. Valéry, E. Avril, C. Calmettes, and J. Navarro. 2020. “OpenMATB: A Multi-Attribute Task Battery Promoting Task Customization, Software Extensibility and Experiment Replicability.” Behavior Research Methods 52 (5): 1980–1990. doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01364-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzindolet, M. T., L. G. Pierce, H. P. Beck, L. A. Dawe, and B. W. Anderson. 2001. “Predicting Misuse and Disuse of Combat Identification Systems.” Military Psychology 13 (3): 147–164. doi:10.1207/S15327876MP1303_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, C., and D. Norman. 2019. “The Challenges of Automation in the Automobile.” Ergonomics 62 (4): 512–513. doi:10.1080/00140139.2019.1563336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. 2017. “From Here to Autonomy: Lessons Learned from Human–Automation Research.” Human Factors 59 (1): 5–27. doi:10.1177/0018720816681350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., R. J. Jagacinski, R. Parasuraman, C. D. Wickens, G. F. Wilson, and D. B. Kaber. 2013. “Human-Automation Interaction Research: Past, Present, and Future.” Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications 21 (2): 9–14. doi:10.1177/1064804613477099.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. A., and M. Bashir. 2015. “Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust.” Human Factors 57 (3): 407–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, A., S. Elsawah, and H. A. Abbass. 2020. “The Reliability and Transparency Bases of Trust in Human-Swarm Interaction: Principles and Implications.” Ergonomics 63: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, G, and S. Guerlain. 2000. “Operator Interaction with Model-Based Predictive Controllers in Petrochemical Refining.” Proceedings of the Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation Conference, 172–177. Marietta, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Karpinsky, N. D., E. T. Chancey, D. B. Palmer, and Y. Yamani. 2018. “Automation Trust and Attention Allocation in Multitasking Workspace.” Applied Ergonomics 70: 194–201. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., and N. Moray. 1994. “Trust, Self-Confidence, and Operators’ Adaptation to Automation.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40 (1): 153–184. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leukel, J., J. González, and M. Riekert. 2021. “Adoption of Machine Learning Technology for Failure Prediction in Industrial Maintenance: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 61: 87–96. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., and L. Wang. 2017. “Human Motion Prediction for Human-Robot Collaboration.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 44: 287–294. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan, P., and D. A. Wiegmann. 2007. “Effects of Information Source, Pedigree, and Reliability on Operator Interaction with Decision Support Systems.” Human Factors 49 (5): 773–785. doi:10.1518/001872007X230154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchon, J. B., M. Bueno, and J. Navarro. 2020. “From Manual to Automated Driving: How Does Trust Evolve?” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 22: 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzey, D., J. Reichenbach, and L. Onnasch. 2012. “Human Performance Consequences of Automated Decision Aids: The Impact of Degree of Automation and System Experience.” Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 6 (1): 57–87. doi:10.1177/1555343411433844.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, U., and R. Parasuraman. 2001. “The Role of the Air Traffic Controller in Future Air Traffic Management: An Empirical Study of Active Control Versus Passive monitoring.” Human Factors 43 (4): 519–528. doi:10.1518/001872001775870421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moray, N., T. Inagaki, and M. Itoh. 2000. “Adaptive Automation, Trust, and Self-Confidence in Fault Management of Time-Critical Tasks.” Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied 6 (1): 44–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J. 2019. “A State of Science on Highly Automated Driving.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 20 (3): 366–396. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2018.1439544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J., L. Heuveline, E. Avril, and J. Cegarra. 2018. “Influence of Human-Machine Interactions and Task Demand on Automation Selection and Use.” Ergonomics 61 (12): 1601–1612. doi:10.1080/00140139.2018.1501517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, B. M. Mouloua, and P. Hancock. 2003. “Effects of Automation Reliability on Human Monitoring Performance.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 47, 188–190. March 2003; New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Onnasch, L. 2015. “Crossing the Boundaries of Automation—Function Allocation and Reliability.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 76: 12–21. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., and D. H. Manzey. 2010. “Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration.” Human Factors 52 (3): 381–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, L., S. Rodríguez-Jiménez, N. Rodríguez, R. Usamentiaga, D. F. García, and L. Wang. 2020. “Symbiotic Human–Robot Collaborative Approach for Increased Productivity and Enhanced Safety in the Aerospace Manufacturing Industry.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 106 (3–4): 851–863. doi:10.1007/s00170-019-04638-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira, E., A. Cross, E. Leitch, and C. Bonaceto. 2014. “Displaying Contextual Information Reduces the Costs of Imperfect Decision Automation in Rapid Retasking of ISR Assets.” Human Factors 56 (6): 1036–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira, E., K. McGarry, and R. Parasuraman. 2007. “Effects of Imperfect Automation on Decision Making in a Simulated Command and Control Task.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49 (1): 76–87. doi:10.1518/001872007779598082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago-Espada , Y. R. R. Myer, K. A. Latorella, and J. R. Comstock Jr. 2011. The Multi-Attribute Task Battery II (MATB-II) Software for Human Performance and Workload Research: A User’s Guide. Hampton, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, K. E., J. Y. Chen, J. L. Szalma, and P. A. Hancock. 2016. “A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems.” Human Factors, 58 (3): 377–400.
   Google Scholar
• Seong, Y., and A. M. Bisantz. 2008. “The Impact of Cognitive Feedback on Judgment Performance and Trust with Decision Aids.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 38 (7–8): 608–625. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sripada, A., P. Bazilinskyy, and J. de. Winter. 2021. “Automated Vehicles That Communicate Implicitly: Examining the Use of Lateral Position within the Lane.” Ergonomics 64 (11): 1416–1423. doi:10.1080/00140139.2021.1925353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verberne, F. M., J. Ham, and C. J. Midden. 2012. “Trust in Smart Systems: Sharing Driving Goals and Giving Information to Increase Trustworthiness and Acceptability of Smart Systems in Cars.” Human Factors 54 (5): 799–810. doi:10.1177/0018720812443825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., and S. R. Dixon. 2007. “The Benefits of Imperfect Diagnostic Automation: A Synthesis of the Literature.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8 (3): 201–212. doi:10.1080/14639220500370105.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., B. A. Clegg, A. Z. Vieane, and A. L. Sebok. 2015. “Complacency and Automation Bias in the Use of Imperfect Automation.” Human Factors 57 (5): 728–739. doi:10.1177/0018720815581940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegmann, D. A., A. Rich, and H. Zhang. 2001. “Automated Diagnostic Aids: The Effects of Aid Reliability on Users’ Trust and Reliance.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2 (4): 352–367. doi:10.1080/14639220110110306.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. L., J. Y. C. Chen, and S. G. Lakhmani. 2020. “Agent Transparency and Reliability in Human–Robot Interaction: The Influence on User Confidence and Perceived Reliability.” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 50 (3): 254–263. doi:10.1109/THMS.2019.2925717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar