Field study on the use and acceptance of an arm support exoskeleton in plastering

References

• Alabdulkarim, S., and M.A. Nussbaum. 2019. “Influences of Different Exoskeleton Designs and Tool Mass on Physical Demands and Performance in a Simulated Overhead Drilling Task.” Applied Ergonomics 74 (February 2018): 55–66. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crea, S., P. Beckerle, M. De Looze, K. De Pauw, L. Grazi, T. Kermavnar, J. Masood, L.W. O’Sullivan, I. Pacifico, C. Rodriguez-Guerrero, N. Vitiello, D. Ristić-Durrant, and J. Veneman. 2021. “Occupational Exoskeletons: A Roadmap toward Large-Scale Adoption. Methodology and Challenges of Bringing Exoskeletons to Workplaces.” Wearable Technologies 2: E11. doi:10.1017/wtc.2021.11.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, A.W., M.P. de Looze, and F. Krause. 2020. “The Experience of Plasterers towards Using an Arm Support Exoskeleton.” 2020 International Symposium on Wearable Robotics (WeRob). doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69547-7_28.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, A.W., M.P. de Looze, and M.P. Michiel. 2019. “The Effect of Arm Support Exoskeletons in Realistic Work Activities: A Review Study.” Journal of Ergonomics 9: 255.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, A.W., M. Murphy, R. Könemann, I. Kingma, and M.P. de Looze. 2019. “The Amount of Support Provided by a Passive Arm Support Exoskeleton in a Range of Elevated Arm Postures.” IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors 7 (3–4): 311–321. doi:10.1080/24725838.2019.1669736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, A.W., F. Krause, and M.P. de Looze. 2020. “The Effectivity of a Passive Arm Support Exoskeleton in Reducing Muscle Activation and Perceived Exertion during Plastering Activities.” Ergonomics 64 (6): 712–721. doi:10.1080/00140139.2020.1868581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2017a. Sixth European Working Conditions Survey – Overview Report (2017 Update). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2806/784968.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2017b. “Working Conditions of Workers of Different Ages: European Working Conditions Survey 2015.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.75056-2.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2021. Working Conditions and Sustainable Work: An Analysis Using the Job Quality Framework, Challenges and Prospects in the EU Series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/flagship-report/2021/working-conditions-and-sustainable-work-an-analysis-using-the-job-quality-framework
   Google Scholar
• Hefferle, M., M. Snell, and K. Kluth. 2021. “Influence of Two Industrial Overhead Exoskeletons on Perceived Strain – A Field Study in the Automotive Industry.” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1210 AISC. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51758-8_13.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., M.A. Nussbaum, M.I. Mokhlespour Esfahani, M.M. Alemi, S. Alabdulkarim, and E. Rashedi. 2018a. “Assessing the Influence of a Passive, Upper Extremity Exoskeletal Vest for Tasks Requiring Arm Elevation: Part I – “Expected” Effects on Discomfort, Shoulder Muscle Activity, and Work Task Performance.” Applied Ergonomics 70 (February): 315–322. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, S., M.A. Nussbaum, M.I. Mokhlespour Esfahani, M.M. Alemi, B. Jia, and E. Rashedi. 2018b. “Assessing the Influence of a Passive, Upper Extremity Exoskeletal Vest for Tasks Requiring Arm Elevation: Part II – “Unexpected” Effects on Shoulder Motion, Balance, and Spine Loading.” Applied Ergonomics 70 (February): 323–330. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, S., M.A. Nussbaum, M. Smets, and S. Ranganathan. 2021. “Effects of an Arm-Support Exoskeleton on Perceived Work Intensity and Musculoskeletal Discomfort: An 18-Month Field Study in Automotive Assembly.” American Journal of Industrial Medicine 64 (11): 905–914. doi:10.1002/ajim.23282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, T., and S. Fischer. 2019. “Considerations for Industrial Use: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Active and Passive Upper Limb Exoskeletons on Physical Exposures.” IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors 7 (3–4): 322–347. doi:10.1080/24725838.2019.1684399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omoniyi, A., C. Trask, S. Milosavljevic, and O. Thamsuwan. 2020. “Farmers’ Perceptions of Exoskeleton Use on Farms: Finding the Right Tool for the Work(er).” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 80: 103036. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashedi, E., S. Kim, M.A. Nussbaum, and M.J. Agnew. 2014. “Ergonomic Evaluation of a Wearable Assistive Device for Overhead Work.” Ergonomics 57 (12): 1864–1874. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.952682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theurel, J., K. Desbrosses, T. Roux, and A. Savescu. 2018. “Physiological Consequences of Using an Upper Limb Exoskeleton during Manual Handling Tasks.” Applied Ergonomics 67: 211–217. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Engelhoven, L., N. Poon, H. Kazerooni, A. Barr, D. Rempel, and C. Harris-Adamson. 2018. “Evaluation of an Adjustable Support Shoulder Exoskeleton on Static and Dynamic Overhead Tasks.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 62 (1): 804–808. doi:10.1177/1541931218621184.
   Google Scholar